CD-0001-19 MAY 24, 2019 APPENDIX G: Public correspondence

STATE OF CALIFORNIA—NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR

CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION

45 FREMONT STREET, SUITE 2000

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2219

VOICE: (415) 904-5200

FAX: (415) 904-5400

TDD: (415) 597-5885

W21a

CD-0001-19

MAY 24, 2019

APPENDIX G: Public correspondence since March 22, 2019 staff

report

March 20

, 2019

California Coastal Commission

Submitted via email to: john[email protected]a.gov; alison.dettmer@coastal.ca.gov;

[email protected].gov

RE: Trinidad Rancheria Hotel Development Project, CD-0001-19, Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of

the Trinidad Rancheria, Humboldt County.

Dear Coastal Commissioners and staff,

The City of Trinidad agrees with your staff’s request to the Bureau of Indian Affairs that the Consistency

Determination CD-0001-19 for the Trinidad Rancheria Hotel Development Project should be delayed

until August 2019. This would allow for local participation in the hearing, and at least as important, it

would allow for significant new information about the scope and impacts of the project to be considered

in making your determination.

If the BIA rejects your request for a time extension and requires that the Commission make this

Consistency Determination in April 2019, the City of Trinidad urges the Coastal Commission to find the

project as proposed is not consistent with Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. The Commission has not been

provided current or adequate information to make a consistency finding. The application to you is not

complete. Rejecting the application will provide the applicant an opportunity to return with the

additional information you need to make a Consistency Determination.

The City of Trinidad, local community members, and other state and federal agencies all submitted

detailed comments on the Draft Environmental Assessment for this project. The City’s letter is attached

and incorporated herein to our comments. Key issues identified by the City and other commenters

include traffic impacts, visual impacts, lack of a committed water supply, geologic instability, and

concerns about the capacity of the site to accommodate the wastewater from the Hotel in leach fields

on a coastal bluff. No responses have been provided to any comments submitted on the Draft EA.

The Trinidad Rancheria provided an update to the City about the project on March 13th. According to

their presentation, the Rancheria has modified the project and is gathering significant new information

as part of responding to the Draft EA comments. This information includes a new traffic study nearing

completion, a new assessment of the expected water use, a new analysis of the wastewater system

capacity, a new geologic study, and a redesigned hotel to address visual impacts. None of these reports

have yet been released to the public or included in the Consistency Determination request to the

Commission. Each of these studies, along with the revised project information are critical for the

Commission to make a finding that the BIA’s current application is consistent with the Coastal Act.

According to the Draft EA, this is a proposal for a 100 room, five story hotel, right on the edge of a

unstable coastal bluff, with no guaranteed water supply, traffic impacts identified but not mitigated, and

no clearly acceptable wastewater disposal. If this project was not on federal land, the Commission

would never accept the level of information that has been provided to you as a ‘complete application’.

You are being asked to agree that this project is ‘consistent’ with Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act based on

outdated and inadequate information, some of which clearly points to significant impacts. Your staff’s

request for a time extension is correct, and if it is not granted by the BIA, you should reject the

Consistency Determination on the basis that the applicant has not provide adequate or current

information about the project’s impacts to coastal resources.

Please review our attached letter on the Draft EA, as well as those of other concerned agencies and

citizens.

Thank you for your attention to this critical decision,

Eli Naffah

City Manager

City of Trinidad

cc (via email)

Trinidad City Council

Trinidad Planning Commission

Trinidad City Planner

Cher-ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria

Bureau of Indian Affairs

California Coastal Conservancy

State Lands Commission

^-6!e

"fZrmr{.{

r0t22t20r8

Amy

Dutschke

Regional

Director

Bureau

of Indian

Affairs

Pacific

Regional

Office

Attn:

Dan

Hall

2800

Cottage Way

Sacramento,

CA 95825

RE:

Comments

on the

Environmental

Assessment

for Trinidad

Rancheria

Economic

Development

Corp. Hotel

Development

Project,

Cher-Ae Heights

Indian

Community

of the

Trinidad

Rancheria.

Humboldt

Countv

Dear

Regional

Director Dutschke,

The

City of Trinidad

appreciates

this opportunity

provide

comments to the

Bureau of Indian

Affairs

on the llnvironmental

Assessment

for the

Hotel Development

Project,

proposed

by the

Trinidad Rancheria

Economic Development

Corporation.

The

City of Trinidad

is an immediate

neighbor

to this

proposed

project,

and some

of the key

impacts

of the

proposed

project

directly affect

the City, including

transportation, views,

water

supply

and water

quality.

The City respects

the Rancheria's longstanding

efforts

to advance

economic

development

projects

for the benefit

Rancheria

members. The

City and the

Rancheria

have

mutual

respect for

the

protection

and

enhancement of

our

fragile

coastal

environment.

The City

offers these comments

part

of the NEPA

process

to ensure

that the

impacts

of the

proposed

project

are fully

described, a range of

project

alternatives

and mitigation

measures

to address

these impacts

are considered, and that

any final

project

avoids significant

environmental

impacts.

The

City believes

that an Environmental

Impact

Statement

(EIS)

is required for

this

project (l)

because

the EA identifies

significant and

potentially

significant impacts that

are not adequately

mitigated,

and

(2)

because the EA lacks the

detail and technical data to

support a finding of no

significant impact in many

sections.

Key issues that the

City

believes make this

draft

inadequate

for a FONSI determination include but are not limited

to:

the absence of

any committed water supply

for the

project,

making

it impossible

to evaluate

the

potential

impacts

the

project

to water resources, as

well as any mitigation that may

needed to address them;

significant

impacts

transportation and circulation are identified, but are not adequately

analyzed or addressed by the

proposed

mitigation;

significant

impacts

to visualresources

in this state and nationally

recognized

coastal

view area

that are not fully analyzed and addressed by

the

proposed

mitigation;

4) inadequate information about the wastewater disposal

capacity for the

project,

which makes it

impossible to

evaluate

potential

impacts to and mitigation for bluff stability,

ground

and

surface

water

quality,

and ocean water

quality.

More detailed comments on

these and other

issues

are

provided

below,

with

a discussion of

the

project

in the context of NEPA

guidance

and

requirements.

Detailed Comments

1.3

Location and Setting

The

City of

Trinidad, the

Trinidad Rancheria,

and the surrounding

landscape and ocean

are

part

of an incredibly beautiful,

environmentally

sensitive, and

unique location. Consideration

environmental

impacts

needs to take this

localcontext into

account. The State

has recognized

the

importance and need

for

protection

of the

abundant and

productive

kelp beds

and nearshore

rocky

environment

by designating

the Trinidad

Bay Area of Special

Biological Significance

(ASBS)r

and State

Water

Quality

Protection

Area

just

offshore

the

proposed

project,

and by

designating this

stretch of coastline

as the

Trinidad

Head

Critical

Coastal

Area

(CCA)2.

The

Federal

government

has also

recognized this area as

a formal Gateway

to the California

Coastal

National

Monument

(CCNM)1. Trinidad

Head, with a direct

view of the

project

site,

one

the only onshore

portions

of the

Federal CCNM

and was selected

parl

due

to the

public

accessibility

and the scenic

visual resources

of this area.

The State

ASBS and CCA

designations both

identify

nutrient and bacteriological

pollution as threats

to this imporlant

ocean

environment, and

the ASBS

includes strict

regulations

prohibit

any

degradation

of natural

water

quality.

')..

This section of the EA

(1.3)

should briefly describe

these

state

and national designations.

The

special setting

forthis

project, perched

the

bluff

immediately overlookingthis state and

federally

recognized

coastal area, should be

an important

part

of evaluating

the environmental

impacts of the

proposed project. Figure 1.2 should be

revised, or additional

figures added, to

identify the Trinidad

Head ASBS, Trinidad Head CCA, and

the federal

CCNM.

Water

Supply

Water Supply is discussed

in numerous

sections of

the EA, including 2.2.1,3.2.4, 3.10.7, and

4.1.7. The following comments are relevant to all of those sections.

Water/wastewater volume: The

project

description states that the Hotel will

generate

8,000

gpd

wastewater,

but the

water

supply section

states that the Hotelwill use almost

19,000

gpd

potable

water. This difference cannot be explained by

reuse

of treated

wastewater. The water

coming

and the

water

going

out need to be

balance,

and corrected numbers are

needed to

properly

assess both water supply

impacts and wastewater

impacts. Without consistent and

accurate

information about the volume of

water needed, and

wastewater

produced,

there

is no

sound basis

for

evaluating

the environmental consequences

of the

proposed project

with regard

to water supply or wastewater disposal.

Water

Source:

The City's Water System

is described as the

preferred

supply for the

proposed

project.

The City has not received any

application for new or expanded

water service for the

Hotel, and has made no commitment

provide potable

water

forthe

proposed

Hotel. The EA

does not

propose

any alternate

water

source

for the

project.

The

percentages

'available

water supply' cited

the

EA appear to be based on the

maximum

amount allowed to

withdrawn annually under our

water rights to Luffenholtz Creek, but

this

maximum is not the limiting

factor for the water system. The limiting

factors

are

the

operational

capacity of the City's

Treatment Plant, and the requirements to maintain

minimum flows in the

Creek during drought conditions. Current

efforts by the City to

generate

updated information

about system capacity and future needs, and to

review water

priorities

and

policy,

are expected to

continue for at least

several

months. The City's current

priorities

for any remaining

water

system

capacity are first to

ensure

adequate supply for existing customers and second

to retain capacity

service

planned

build-out

within the City limits

Cumulative

Effects

Water Resources

The

City does not believe there is adequate basis to support the statement

Section

4.1.2that

'there

is adequate supply

surface water from Luffenholtz Creek to serve additionalprojects

theRegion...'Aprolongedefforttopermitamajorsubdivision(theMossSubdivision)inthe

Luffenholtz

Creek

watershed

concluded

that there was not adequate water to support new

withdrawals

during the dry season and required

new

development to avoid any

new

dry season

use of Luffenholtz

Creek. As described

above, the City

goingthrough

its

own

evaluation

of the

capacity

and

priorities

for

our

water

system before making

a decision on

providing

water

service

to the Hotel.

conclusion, the EA's findings that the City's

water

system

can

support the

Hotel Project

needs

without

significant impacts are

premature.

There is no basis for that determination in

the

EA. lt

unclear frorn the EA where

the Hotel

Project would

obtain water if the City decides it

cannot

provide

the water.

Until a

potable

water

source

secured,

it is not

possible

to evaluate the

potential

impacts

to that source, or

mitigation measures

that

may

needed

to address

them. Therefore the BIA

cannot

make

'finding

significant

impact'

FONSI

regarding

water supply based on this draft

EA.

3.7.2 Transportation and

Circulation

The

City agrees

with

the

that the

proposed project would

have significant

traffic impacts to

the

Main

St./Scenic Dr.

intersection,

the

largest and most complex intersection

the City of

Trinidad. The

proposed

mitigation for these impacts

the construction

of a Cher-Ae Lane Hwy

l0l interchange. TheCitybelievesthiscouldonlybeanacceptablemitigationmeasureifthe

the hotel

project

is began concurrent with or subsequent

to this new interchange.

The

City

understands that the

Rancheria is committed to

pursuing

the

Cher-Ae Lane interchange

project

and continues

to work towards that

goal.

However the interchange

still

in the

planning

stages. Environmental

permitting

just

starting,

no funding is secured

forconstruction, and

final approvalsfortheprojecthavenotbeencompleted.

Thisinterchangeproject,unlikethe

Hotel

project,

involves

both

trust lands and

non-trust land, and

therefore subject

to CEQA and

the

California

Coastal Act among other state

and

local laws. This substantially

increases the

timeline,

regulatory requirements, and uncertainty about

the outcome of this

planned project.

Mitigation measures must be

timely

the impacts they are

intended to address, and

they must be

tangible measures that the

project

proponent

commits to

implementing. The interchange

could

only be

considered acceptable mitigation

if the Hotel

project

was

developed

concurrent

with

after a new interchange

operational.

As currently

proposed

in the

EA, the largest intersection

in Trinidad would be significantly

impacted with

no mitigation for many

years,

and no real

guarantee

of rn itigation at al

The EA therefore describes significant

unavoidable

impacts to Transportation

and Circulation

without acceptable

mitigation measures

for them. Alternative

mitigation

measures that address

the identified impacts and are

timely to those

impacts should be

developed

in consultation

with

CalTrans and the City of

Trinidad, where

those impacts

will be realized,

and where

the likely

mitigation measures

will need to be

implemented.

Without this analysis

included

in the EA,

the

BIA has no

basis for determining the environmental

consequences of the

proposed project.

Until

adequate mitigation measures are identified, the

BIA cannot make a

'finding

significant impact' or

FONSI regarding

transportation

and

circulation resources.

Wastewater Treatment

There is inadequate

information in the EA to determine

whetherthere is leachfield

capacity

serve the

project

the Rancheria's

property, and there is no information about what

regulatory

agency

would

review

and approve a

leachfield disposal system. Responsible

independent

agency review and approval of any final

wastewater

disposal system should be

a basic mitigation

measure. The federal trust

status of

the

project

site

makes it unclear what agency would

provide

that review and approval; this should be clarified

in the EA or ElS.

The Preliminary

Wastewater

Feasibility

Report

(Appendix

A) describes

significant unoertainty

about the

current state

of the community

dispersal

field, and about the expansion of

that dispersal

system

which the Hotel

project would require, including

the following statements:

"The

community dispersal

field

was

designed

with

capacity of 10,000

gallons per

day.

However, with

plugging

believed to have been

caused by

the discharge of Casino

wastewater

the field before the treatment

plant

was completed,

the actual

long-term capacity of the

dispersal

field at this

time is not known. The existing

dispersal

field should be

cleaned and then the

capacity should be evaluated

through

field investigations

and hydraulic stress testing

determine the actual operations

capacity."

"...it

is criticalthat

this capacity is verified."

(Referring

to the existing system

capacity)

site survey should

be the

first

order

work to confirm the Cher-Ae

facility

has the capacity

support

the

proposed

hotel."

The report also

refers to soils on

the Rancheria

property

"marginal" for

septic

disposal, and

that

the

existing system

lacks the designation

of a

reserve area, which

is a standard

requirement

for leachfields.

The report concludes

with the following

statement:

cannot stress

enough the

need to determine

if there is additional dispersal

capacity on

the site and

where the

resource is on the

Rancheria.

The size and

location of these areas

will have a significant

irnpact on the design

and associated

cost

with the

dispersal

component of

the system."

Overall, Appendix

shows

that

(l)

the capacity

of the existing

leachfield

is unknown,

(2)

onsite

testing has been done

to verify there

is adequate

room for expansion ofthe

leach area

(and

the amount of expansion

area

is unknown, since

the existing

capacity

unknown),

and

(3)

there

no resenre area in a

location with

"marginal soils"

where a dispersal field

is expected to fail

eventually.

Fufther, the

EA does

not explain the discrepancy

between the

projected

water use of

almost

19,000

gpd,

and the

projected wastewater

flows of 10,000

gpd.

Without additional

information

about the capacity of

the site to accept

the

project

wastewater,

and clarity on the actual

volume of wastewater

to be disposed of,

it is not

possible

to adequately

evaluate

the

potential

impacts of

wastewater disposalto bluff

stability,

ground

water, or surface

and ocean waters, or

the mitigation measures

that may be

needed to address those

impacts. This

is especially true considering

the

proximity

the

project

site to the

Trinidad

Bay ASBS,

SWQPA,

and CCA and the CA

CoastalNational

Monument.

Therefore the BIA

cannot make a

'finding

significant

impact' or FONSI

regarding

wastewater

disposal

based

on this draft

EA.

Visual Resources

The City agrees

with the EA that

the

proposed Hotel

would impact the

visual resources

of this

incredibly scenic areaand

would be

clearly

visible from Trinidad

Head,

nearshore waters and

the

California Coastal

National Monument.

The most obvious

mitigation

measures to address

these

impacts are to consideralternative

locations on

the Rancheria,

alternative sizes

and

heights for

the

hotel, and to consider

a less'boxy'design.

The failure of

the EA to

identify any alternative

locations, configurations,

or sizes

for the

proposed Hotel make

it difficult to consider

effective

mitigation measures

for visualresource

impacts.

These should be

addressed

in the alternatives

section

of an EIS.

Fufthermore,

Section

3. | 3.3 describes

mitigation

measures

that

"shall be

incorporated"

in the

design. Comments

from

members of the

Rancheria

development

team

at the October

15,

2018

City Councilmeeting

indicate that alternative

designs

are available

that incorporate

said

measures.

No such desisn

considerations

are

found in

the environmental

assessment.

Community

residents have

expressed significant

concerns about

visual

resource

impacts, and

about

the lack of clarity

in the

EA regarding

the final

appearance.

The City

encourages

the

Rancheria to consider

a significant

reworking

of the design,

and

to include

the mitigation

efforts

outlined

in Section

3.13.3

In order to better

consider

the impacts,

and

mitigation options

for those

impacts, an

EIS or

revised EA should

include simulated

views of the

proposed Hotel from

key

prominent locations,

like the

Trinidad Pier,

Trinidad

Head Trails,

and Edwards

St.

Furthermore,

the City

believes

that

the

United

Indian Health Services

Potawat

Health Village is an excellent example of

local

facility that clearly values a

design that

both

culturally significant

and

"fits"

in with the

surroundi

ng environment.

The Rancheria improved the

harbor when they

took it over,

putting

in a state-of-the art

pier

and

wastewater treatment

facility, thus respecting

the surrounding

area of significant biological

significance.

'Ihe

current

EA does

not reflect their

demonstrated commitment

to sound design

principles.

The EA has not delivered

a satisfactory

description of what

the visual impacts

will be

nor the ways that mitigation

measures

might address those

impacts.

Other Issues

Law Enforcement

The hotel

will increase the law

enforcement

needs for the

Rancheria. The

number or hours of

deputy service to be

provided

the Rancheria

through

the described contract

should be

included

this section

andanalyzed

foradequacy.

addition,

a"will

serve"

letterorequivalent

document

needs to be included

to document

that the Sheriff

Department has been

adequately

consulted and

the EA

includes a factual basis

for determining

the environmental

consequences

the

proposed

project

with

regard to law enforcement.

Fire Protection

The Trinidad Volunteer

Fire

Deparlment

(TVFD) has only one station,

with approximately

six

volunteer

fire fighters.

The

'second

station'

referred to

in this section

is an

independent

entity

the Westhaven

Volunteer

Fire Department

(WVFD).

The maps referenced

in this section

seem

to indicatethat

neitherCalfire

oTTVFD

have been

delegated

responsibility for

firefighting on

the

Rancheria.

The Calfire

Fire Marshal

should be

contacted

provide

clarity about

their

responsibilities

the Rancheria.

lf a contract

agreement

already

place

between

the Rancheria

and Calfire

should

be described

and

analyzed

in the NEPA document.

assess

potential impacts and

possible mitigation

measures,

this analysis

should

be based

the results of

qualified professional assessment

firefighting

response

needs, including

access,

water availability,

and

equipment.

This

assessment

should

include

consultation

with

both Calfire

and

Humboldt

Bay Fire. The

local Calfire

Fire Marshal

conducts

assessments

like this.

addition,

"will

setve"

letter or

equivalent

document

needs to be

included

to document

that

adequate

capacity,

staff, and

equipment

exists

to serve

the

Project. Without

this

analysis

included

in the EA, the

BIA has

no basis

for determining

the

environmental

consequences

the

proposed

project with respect

to Fire

Protection.

Air

Qualitv

Air

quality

and

greenhouse

gas

emissions

will

result in impacts off

of the

Rancheria

propefiy.

Therefore,

those impacts

should be

evaluated

terms

of State

laws and standards.

Humboldt

County

does

not meet the state

standard

for PM 10, and

so that should

analyzed

and dust

controlmeasures

included.

A construction

project

the

proposed duration

is also

likely to have

public health affects

that are not analyzed

in the

EA.

Noise

The noise section

is unclear,

with one standard

being

used

in the criteria,

and a

different,

higher

standard used

in the analysis.

addition,

the

size of

the construction

project, includingthe

foundation

that will be

required,

the

range of construction

equipment

listed

is not adequate.

The

number

of truck trips,

timing

and sequence

different

construction

equipment

is not adequately

described.

Other

Notes

Even

impacts

that are clearly

not significant,

that

would be simple

to document

(e.g. flooding)

are

not adequately

analyzed

and sometimes

based on

inappropriate

questionable sources.

The

EA also

contains

incorrect

and

incomplete

information.

For

example,

since

no natural

gas

lines

serve

Humboldt County,

it does

not seem

likely

that the

Rancheria

served

by natural

gas

described

Section

2.2.1.

Also,

the Draft

Geotechnical

Feasible

and

Preliminary

Design

Repoft

describes

new service

access

road

along

the slope

southwest

the existing

casino,

which

would cause

significdnt

cuts and

grading, but

that

road and

associated

impacts are

not

described

or considered

part

the

project.

NEPA

Guidance

regarding

impact

significance:

In determining

the significance

impact,

the Council

Environmental

Quality's

NEPA

regulations

$1508.27

requires

consideration

both

context

and

intensity.

ln considering

context,

it must

be recognized

that

"significance

varies

with sening

the

proposed action."

What is

not

significant

in one

locale,

may be

significant

in another

locale.

As described

more detail

below,

the

project site

is a

particularly sensitive

location,

and

the

project is out of scale

with

the

surrounding

rural

community

setting

and environment.

The City's

General

Plan

includes

the

fo I lowin

descri

ption of com

m un

ity

preferences

Property

owners

strongly

preferred

that

new developmenl

consistenl

with the

present

character

the community.

Everyone

agreed

that

the city

has

unique

characteristics.

I'I/hen

asked

to describe

Trinidad,

they

mentioned

lhese terms:

rural, uncrowded,

quainl, rustic,

peacffil, unsophisticated,

small,

casual,

afeeling

openness,

no tract

houses,

not

commercialized.

Sometimes

they

put

in terms

what they

didn't

want: no

high-density

housing, no mobilehomes and trailer

parks,

no buildings

grealer

than two stories, no motel-

hotel-condominium complexes, no commercial exploitation and

garish

signs.

Trinidad's Design

Review

Guidelines suggest

a maximum square

footage

2,000 for residences

and 4,000 for commercial structures. The

maximum height limit throughout the City is 25 ft.

While the Rancheria is not subject to the City's

land

use standards, this

information is

presented

give

the BIA

a realistic idea of the scale and context of

the

surrounding

community. The

City's current draft Vision Statement developed

for a

comprehensive

General Plan update

includes the following language:

Trinidad

intends to mainlain

the

existing

small town atmosphere. Scenic

and environmental

protections

are essential to Trinidad's

quality

of life

and economy. ... Sustainability is a

keystone

for

all development and a

hallmarkfor daily life and Cityfunctions

in Trinidad.

New environmenlal technologies are embraced

that-/urther

prolecl

Trinidad's'scenic,

nalural

and cultural resources. Trinidad's

waler resource.t, including the Bay and streams

are

unpolluled.

In deterrnining

intensity,

the

Council on

Environmental

Quality'sNEPA

regulations

$1508.27

also require lead agencies

considera

numberof

factors several of

which apply to this

project,

including:

(2)

The degree to which the action

would affect

public

health and safety.

For example,

evaluation should include hazardous

and solid

wastes, air

and water

quality,

and their

relation

public

health.

According to the Office

of Environmental

Health

Hazard Assessment,

an eight to

twelve month

construction

project

is likely to

have

public health impacts

airborne emissions,

includingdust. In addition,

forsensitive

receptors within

500 ft. of Highway

l0l, cumulative

impacts to

public

health from vehicle and

construction

emissions

need to be evaluated.

(3)

Unique

characteristics of the

geographic area such as

proximity

to historic

or cultural

resources,

park

lands,

prine

J'armlands,

wetlands,

wild

and

scenic rivers, or

ecologically critical

areas.

The coastal

waters around Trinidad

have been

designated

as an Area of

Special Biological

Significance

and a State

Water

Quality

Protection

Area by the State

Water

Resources Control

Board and as a Critical

Coastal

Area by the California

Coastal

Commission.

In addition,

Trinidad

has

been

designated by

BLM as

the Nofthern Gateway

the California Coastal

National

Monument. Several

parks, recreational areas

and other

public

access

exist

in and around

the

project

area. See attached

excerpts

from the

various designations

and legal

programs managing

these unique

resources for

further information.

(4)

The degree to

which

the

fficts

on the

quality

the human environment are likely to be

highly controversial.

Two

public

meetings, one sponsored by

a local

group

known

Humboldt Alliance for

Responsible Planning

(HARP)

and one

by the City, attracted

more than

100

attendees

each. This

is a very large number

considering the rural nature of the affected environment.

The

City

Trinidad has a

population

of only 365

residents and the

greater

Trinidad-Westhaven area

has a

population

1,205

(2010

Census).

Most

the meeting attendees expressed

concerns about the

project

presented,

making this

project highly controversial.

(5)

The degree to

which

the

possible

elfects on lhe

human

environment

are highly uncertain

involve unique or

unknown risks.

The EA, including the appendices,

lacks adequate detail

to accurately determine

what the

impacts are

going

to be.

As described above,

primary example is water service and

wastewater

isposal. The water source

for this

project is uncertain, and

the capacity of

the

site

to dispose of

wastewater is unceftain.

(6)

The degree to

which the action

may establish

precedent

for future

actions

with significant

effecls

or represents a

decision in

principle

about

afuture consideration.

The Rancheria

has

plans

for

several

additional

large

projects

that are

mentioned

in the EA and

appendices,

irrcluding a casino

expansion and

a highway

l0l

interchange, all of

which

have the

potential

to impact

the surrounding community.

(7)

Whether the action

is related to other

aclions

with individually

insignificant

but cumulatively

significant

impacts. Significance

exists if it

is reasonable

to anticipate

a cumulatively

significant

impact

on the environment.

Significance

cannot

be avoided

by lerming

an action

temporary

by breaking

it down

into small componenl

parts.

The EA

includes a

Highway

l0l interchange

as mitigation

for significant

traffic impacts.

addition,

Phase 2 of

the Rancheria's

Community

plan

includes a

number of other

projects,

including

an R.V.

park, gas

station,

market,

etc. However,

the

potential for

cumulative

impact

not adequately

addressed

in the

EA.

(10)

Whether the

action

threatens a

violation offederal,

state, or

local lqw or

requirements

imposedfor

the

protection

the environment.

There are

potential

offsite

air and

water

quality

impacts

that have

the

potential to violate

state

environmental

laws that

have not been analyzed

in the EA.

NEPA requires an

EIS to be

prepared when a Federal

action

may significantly

affect

the

quality

of the

human environm ent

(42

USC

4332).

The EA determined

that

traffic impacts

resulting

from

the

project

would be significant.

The mitigation

proposed

is to construct a

new interchange

on Highway

l0l. That mitigation

is not valid

for several

reasons.

Section 6.4.6 of

the BIA

NEPA Guidebook

(59

IAM 3-H)

specifies that

"Any

mitigation

measure

must

enforceable

and it is important

for

BIA Regional and

Agency Offices

establish

monitoring

programs

to ensure

that

mitigation is carried out."

BIA has no authority

enforce this mitigation

measure or

ensure it

carried

out nor does

the Rancheria.

In addition,

the

EA does not adequately

show that

this mitigation

would reduce

impacts to

less than

significant.

Construction of the

interchange

is speculative

at this

point; it is still

the

design

phase,

it has

not been funded,

the environmental

review

has not been

completed,

and it has not been

permitted. If it is constructed,

it will not be

for many

years,

as that

process

is takes

time.

Therefore,

there will be significant

traffic

impacts

from the

project for an unknown

length of

time.

Finally, the

impacts of the

interchange

are not analyzed

at allin

the EA, contrary

to Section

46.130 of the

Department of

Interior

NEPA

regulations, wh

ich

states

that

"the

effects of

any

rnitigation measures...

included

the

applicant's

proposal must be

analyzed."

Section

6.4.5 of the

BIA

NEPA Cuidebook

(59

IAM

3-H)

requires the effects

analysis of

to demonstrate

that

the BIA

took a

"hard

look" at the

impacts of the

action and

that

the

analysis

concentrate

on those components

the affected

environment

that

willtruly be

affected.

Without

this analysis

included in the

EA, the BIA

has no basis

for determining

the

environmental

consequences

ofthe

proposed

project,

and

an EIS should

prepared.

Courls

review EAs and

FONSIs

under a

deferential

arbitrary

and capricious

standard.

Courts

will

consider

whether the analysis

superficial

manipulated,

if the agency

based

its decision

presumptions or conclusions

rather than

facts,

lack of documentation,

internal inconsistencies,

and failure

to consider

cumulative

impacts

and

secondary

impacts.

The

Hotel Development

Project EA suf,fers

from all of

these deficiencies

In the specific

example of

Sierra

Club

v. Peterson

(717

.2d

1409),

the D.C.

Circuit

employed

four-part test

to examine

an agency's

decision

not to

prepare

EIS. The

four factors

were

(l)

whether the agency

took a

"hard look" at the

problem,

(2)

whether the

agency

identified

the

relevant areas of

environmental

concern.

(3)

whether the agency

made a

convincing

case that

the

environmental

impacts of

the

problems identified

were

insignificant,

and

(4)

whether

the agency

established

convincingly

that

any significant

impacts

were minimized.

Section

46.310

(g)

of the

Department

Tnterior

NEPA

regulations

states:

"An environmental

assessment

must contain

objective

analyses

that

support

conclusions

concerning

environmental

impacts."

Many of

the conclusions

in the

EA are

not supported

appropriate

and

factual

documentation.

Water

supply

is a

good

examples

of this.

The EA

presumes

that the

City of

Trinidad

will

supply

potable water for

the

project. As discussed

above,

the

numbers

presented

the

EA are based

on the

City's

entire

permitted water

right

to flows on

Luffenholtz

Creek

without

consideration

of actualtreatment

capacity

the City's

water

plant, low

flow conditions

on the

Creek or

impacts

from climate change and drought. The

City

has

not made a

commitment

provide

water,

and

not clear at this time whether they have the

capacity to do so. Based

the available information, the EA cannot make a determination

that

impacts to water

supply are

less-than-s i

i fi

cant.

Conclusion:

The City believes

the

environmental impacts

this

project

must be addressed through an EIS.

The EA identifies

significant and

potentially

significant impacts that are not adequately

mitigated.

ln addition, the EA lacks the detail and technical data to support a finding of no

significant impact in many

sections,

including water

supply, transportation,

visual resources, and

wastewater.

Preparation

of an EIS

will

serve several

purposes

that the EA currently does not address. It

will

provide

the

opportunity

for the in-depth

analysis

and consideration of impacts that are not

adequately

documented

in the EA. It will

provide

for fufther consideration of alternatives that

could reduce impacts from the

project.

And it

would

allow

fufther involvement from

the

public

and interested agencies.

Thank

you

for

your

consideration of these

comments.

Please

don't

hesitate to contact the City

with

any

questions

or for additional

information.

Daniel Berman

City Manager

Cc:

Trinidad

City Council

Trinidad Planning

Qommission

Jacque

Hostler, Trinidad Rancheria

Humboldt County

Planning Department

California Coastal

Commission, Federal Consistency

Department

State

Water Resources Control

Board,

Ocean

Protection Division

Bureau of Land Management, CCNM

Manager

Environmental Protection Agency

Region 9

Wastewater Division

From: Don Allan

To: Energy@Coastal

Subject: Public Comment on April 2019 Agenda Item Wednesday 14c - CD-0001-19 (Bureau of Indian Affairs, Trinidad)

Date: Friday, March 22, 2019 2:13:57 PM

Attachments: Trinidad Rancheria Creek.jpg

Thank you for the excellent staff report regarding the Trinidad

Rancheria's proposed hotel. I agree with almost all of your

recommendations. However I did want to note what I think is an error in

the assessment. The report states: " The draft EA for the proposed

project states that there are no surface water features or wetlands

within the boundaries of the project site." (p. 22). However there is a

creek that runs through the property that has been routed through a long

pipe starting at the Rancheria Property's eastern property boundary (see

attached map). It emerges into an open channel for perhaps 100 feet

just east of Scenic Drive and then flows under Scenic Drive in a

culvert, with an open channel the rest of the way to the beach and an

open channel upstream of the Rancheria. Because of the lack of CDFW,

County, Coastal Commssion, or NCRWQCB jurisdiction and oversight, the

creek was routed into the pipe and the valley was filled and paved over

to create the parking lot. The work was done very poorly - stumps and

other woody debris were included in the fill and sinkholes later

developed in the parking lot as the fill settled and wood rotted out.

The holes were fixed and have not re-appeared. The filling of a creek is

inconsistent with good stewardship and would not have been allowed by

CDFW, NCRWQCB, or the Coastal Commission had a normal permitting process

been followed. Now the Rancheria's analysis says there are no water

features or wetlands - and this is factually incorrect, as are so many

of the assumptions and assertions in the Environmental Assessment.

I concur with the staff recommendation to vote no on the Consistency

Determination.

Sincerely,

Don Allan,

821 2nd Ave., Trinidad, CA 95570

(707) 273-8065

March 25, 2019

Commissioners

California Coastal Commission

By email to [email protected]

Regarding: CD-0001-19 (Bureau of Indian Affairs, Trinidad—Consistency Determine of Bureau of

Indian Affairs for federal funding guarantee to Cher-Ae-Heights Indian Community of Trinidad

Rancheria for 100-room hotel.

Dear Commissioners,

I have visited and stayed with family in Trinidad since the mid-1960s and brought my family to

live here in 1980. I have worked for a regional environmental organization as executive director

for thirty-one years and am familiar with NEPA, EAs and EIRs, having written comments and

filed suit on many. Today, I am writing as a member of the community to express support for

the development of a hotel at the Cher-Ae-Heights Indian Community adjacent to the Cher-Ae-

Heights casino.

Coastal Commission staff have raised significant concerns about informational gaps in the

current federal Environmental Assessment for the hotel project that should be addressed

before work is undertaken. I appreciate that staff’s comments are clear and concise and seem

reasonable in view of the significance of the project and will help improve the project.

However, I do not recommend that the project be voted against in whole.

Instead, I would ask that you do not vote against the hotel as proposed in size and design.

Having a beautiful hotel above the Trinidad Bay owned by the very People who had their land

taken without compensation, not owned by some Los Vegas or other entity not closely tied to

Trinidad Bay as is the Rancheria, is not a blight on the view. It’s a proud symbol of honor for our

local Native Americans.

There is one positive for the hotel which I haven’t heard mentioned yet and that is the potential

for very significant improvement to the City of Trinidad a beautiful local hotel is likely to

provide.

Currently, housing in the City of Trinidad and the surrounding area in the 95570 zip code for full

time residents is severely limited due to the great number of homes that are used exclusively

for vacation rentals. The impact of an itinerant population on the Trinidad area’s social

structure has been immense. The local school, for example, where my two children attended,

came close to closing its doors a few years ago due to the lack of children students in the

community, and Trinidad today remains diminished because few children and families reside

there on a permanent basis relative to the size of the town. A hotel would take much of the

pressure and financial incentive from housing owners in Trinidad who currently hold their

housing stock for vacation rentals and will free up housing for people who intend to live and

participate in the civic life of Trinidad. I consider this a great potential positive and for this

reason alone a worthy to support the construction of a hotel in the Trinidad area.

Trinidad Rancheria, aka Cher-Ai-Heights Community, has an excellent track record as a

neighbor. Projects undertaken by Trinidad Rancheria have immensely improved Trinidad Bay by

removing long-time and serious sources of sediment, toxic chemicals, human waste and other

discharges from areas such as the repair of the north end of Scenic Drive between the

Rancheria and Trinidad, the boat launch and replacement of the toxic pier and pier-side

gasoline pump with a non-toxic pier, a public bathroom for State Beach visitors and much more.

The community’s waste water system and casino were constructed for minimal environmental

impact. I have come to greatly respect and admire the Rancheria for its environmentally sound

projects and I expect that the hotel is also intended to be environmentally sound in keeping

with the Rancheria’s track record.

Thank you for your consideration of my comments.

Patty Clary

844 3

Avenue

Trinidad, CA 95570

707-834-4833

From: Don Allan

To: Energy@Coastal

Subject: Public Comment on April 2019 Agenda Item Wednesday 14c - CD-0001-19 (Bureau of Indian Affairs, Trinidad)

Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 4:11:35 PM

Attachments: AirPhotoMap_Cher"aeHtsCasino.jpg

Application # CD-0001-19

Bureau of Indian Affairs CD

Agenda Item W14c

Position in Opposition to the

Project

Submitted By: Don Allan, 821

2nd Ave., Trinidad, CA 95570

Dear Sir/ Mme.:

I am writing to express my concern over the proposed hotel at the Trinidad

Rancheria and request that you deny the application for a Consistency

Determination. The Environmental Assessment (EA) prepared for the project has

many shortcomings and the proposed project has created controversy within the

community and among experts in geology, wildlife, biology, traffic, water supply, and

engineering. The assessments presented in the EA are cursory and inadequate. The

EA glosses over major issues and fails to provide a range of alternatives.

One of my concerns is the siting of the hotel in geologically unstable terrain. The

Trinidad area and the site of the hotel are characterized by the Franciscan formation,

a geologic type that includes metamorphic and weakly consolidated sedimentary

rock. Geologists frequently describe this formation as akin to rice pudding –raisins

floating in a gelatinous mass. The raisins represent large rocks which may be

mistaken for bedrock but which are large metamorphic rocks floating in the mélange

(the pudding) of uplifted marine terraces composed of sand, clay, and weakly

consolidated rock (sandstone). This formation is characterized by numerous

landslides, soil creep, and unstable landforms. A drive or walk down Scenic Drive,

above which the proposed hotel would sit, reveals many dips, humps, and slumps in

the road, many of which extend all the way from Scenic Drive down to the ocean

and in some cases cross Scenic Drive, affecting the bluffs and terraces above. The

EA for the project reports that there is a shallow landslide on the southwest corner

of the proposed hotel location. The report glosses this over by stating that piles will

be drilled into “bedrock”. However that bedrock is a floating chunk of metamorphic

rock that is mis-characterized as bedrock. In addition to the unstable geology and

numerous landslides in the project area, the project fails to analyze the impact of sea

level rise on slope stability and the potential for translation of that instability

upslope. With minimum sea level rise predicted to be 18 inches by 2050 and up to

60 inches or more by 2100, we can expect an exacerbation of slope instability,

including the landslide that reaches the southwest corner of the proposed hotel, as

waves erode higher up the slope and cause slope adjustments to the over-

steepening caused by wave erosion. Placing a hotel at the proposed location is ill

advised.

Another concern is with the ability of the City of Trinidad to provide the water the

hotel will require. The exact usage is a moving target with the original EA saying it

would be more than 18,000 gallons per day, which was magically and mysteriously

reduced to 3,000 to 3,500 gallons per day (Trinidad Rancheria presentation to

Trinidad City Council, March 13, 2019) with no explanation of how they arrived at

this figure. At full occupancy that would amount to 30 gallons per room per day, an

unrealistically low figure. The City is currently conducting testing to determine the

maximum volume of water that the plant can produce and the system can deliver.

The City has had many problems with its drinking water treatment facility and there

are times during the rainy season when turbidity in the creek and in the City’s raw

water intake (perforated pipes buried in a gravel journal within the bed of

Luffenholtz Creek) exceeds the level of turbidity that the system can treat, meaning

the City has to rely on the reserves in its water tanks until it can process water to

refill the tanks. While a member of the Trinidad Volunteer Fire Department I

witnessed an event where a City water line broke during a hard freeze, draining the

water tanks and creating a water emergency. Such an event left the City extremely

vulnerable for a fire emergency. Adding a 100-room hotel to the system would put

many people in peril in such a situation. If it happened once, it can happen again.

The project does not adequately address worst case scenarios yet common sense

dictates that planning must consider the worst case, which the EA does not.

The project should be planning for the driest possible water year, such as the

drought of 1976-77. A drought of similar proportion today would require the City to

use all of its allocation to supply existing customers. The City also has an obligation

to provide water to un-built lots within the City and to customers within its service

area. The assumption that the City can provide the needed water at all times of year

and in all types of water years is speculative and not supported by the data. In fact

the data suggests that the City may not be able to provide the water during summer

low flow periods, and definitely not during extreme drought conditions. With global

warming our weather is predicted to become warmer and dryer and more frequent

and severe droughts should be anticipated. The EA does not address the worst case

scenario and is inadequate in its assessment of the City’s ability to provide the

required water. A more thorough analysis, which the City is currently conducting,

needs to be completed and the City needs to receive and approve an application for

new service before approving the proposed hotel. A better analysis of alternatives,

including rain water collection, water storage, and reducing demand needs to be

conducted.

Waste water treatment is another concern. The EA contains misleading and

contradictory information in this regard. At one pint the EA states that the proposed

hotel will connect to the City’s sewer system, which does not exist. A 2004

wastewater investigation conducted by Winzler & Kelly, consulting engineers, notes

that there have been problems with the existing leach fields serving the casino,

including construction of decks, a driveway, and a large-above-ground-swimming

pool over septic tanks. Only 7 of 25 septic tanks had access ports, meaning they

could not be inspected nor pumped out as required for regular maintenance. Other

problems identified in the report included high ground water levels, inadequate

setbacks from steep slopes and bluffs, inadequate stream setback, unstable

landforms, and shallow depth to bedrock. Adding more effluent into leach fields will

overwhelm the ability of the leach fields and result in polluted water being

discharged into waters of the United States. A more thorough analysis and

consideration of alternatives needs to be conducted.

The visual impacts of the revised 5 story hotel design are significant and cannot be

mitigated. The Trinidad Coast is popular because of its scenic beauty. Trinidad Head

and the offshore rocks in Trinidad Bay have been designated under the California

Coastal National Monument (CCNM) because of their scenic values, the wildlife

supported within the CCNM, and the unique attributes of the coast line. There is no

mitigation for the visual impacts of a 5-story hotel in the proposed location. The

proposed hotel is totally out of character for the scenic and lightly developed setting

in which it is proposed. Given the outstanding visual characteristics of the

surroundings, the logical conclusion is to reject what is proposed and deny the

Consistency Determination request.

Impacts to wildlife are not adequately assessed in the EA. There are numerous

studies that indicate glass windows are a major hazard to birds because of the

reflective nature of windows that hides the glass from the birds, making it appear

that there is open sky rather than a glass window. Up to one billion birds per year

die due to collisions with windows (https://audubonportland.org/files/habitat/bird-

safe-brochure-2015). The proposed location of the hotel is in an area of many

roosting and nesting trees and in a location where birds migrate on a daily basis to

and from the ocean. The proposed hotel would have a significant negative effect on

birds and wildlife.

The EA also states that no water of the US are located on the project site, yet there

is a creek less than 250 feet north of the proposed hotel location (see attached air

photo/ map). The creek was routed into a pipe and filled over to build the parking

lot, perhaps that is why it was not recognized as a creek. After the creek was filled

in and the parking area was built over it, sinkholes developed in the parking lot

because the Rancheria did not have to follow California Fish & Game code, and did

not follow standard engineering criteria for clean fill and compaction, nor obtain a

streambed alteration agreement (SAA). Had a SAA and preparation of a CEQA

document (need to obtain a SAA) been required, the California Department of Fish &

Wildlife, the State Water Quality Control Board, the Coastal Commission, and the

Army Corps of Engineers, all entities normally consulted and commenting on

projects, would not have approved the project. Although the creek does not provide

habitat for salmon, it has the potential to provide habitat for the torrent salamander

and other aquatic species and amphibians. The EA does not address impacts to

aquatic habitat and this request for a consistency determination must be denied.

Traffic impacts are not adequately addressed in the EA. The addition of a 100 room

hotel will add a significant volume of traffic to Scenic Drive from both clients and

staff. The Rancheria has obtained a grant from the California Transportation

Commission to prepare designs and analysis for a freeway interchange to service the

casino and proposed hotel yet that project is not addressed in the EA, even though

the two are inextricably linked. The interchange will have significant impacts yet it is

supposed to mitigate traffic impacts of the proposed hotel. The Rancheria’s plans

include future additions of a gas station, RV park, convenience store, and other

facilities that are not addressed in the EA. This is splitting the project into smaller

components to avoid analysis of the cumulative effects of all the proposed actions

and would not be permissible under State law. This again leads to the conclusion

that a consistency determination cannot be made for the project.

To summarize, the EA insufficiently assesses water supply, waste water treatment,

visual impacts, geologic issues, traffic, impacts to biological resources, and

alternatives. The consistency determination request must be denied.

Thank you for considering my comments.

Sincerely,

Don Allan

MARGARET

RAPER

\ll()li\t:\

\t l. \\\

POB 116,

B.\\'SrDIt

C.\

9552+

3i28i2019

(]]\IIFORN

COASTAL CONII\ SSION

.15

FRI]N{ONT,

SUITE 2OOO

sr\N FR \NCISCq

9+105-

2219

Re: Consistency

Determination No.: CD

0001-19

hotcl development near

Cher-Ae Heights

Casino, Trinidad,

Dear Coastal Commissioners and

Staff,

As a taxpayer in I{umboldt Count for 26

years.

rvith l'amily

living in Trinidad. I can tell

vou

that many

aspects of this

pro-iect

are alarming. My expericnces r.vith Native American crrmnrunities here in Northern

Cali[ornia have shown me

that

many indigenous

people

value

environmental appropriateness and

good

use ofthe land. While I recognize that

there is a

wide

spectrum of

interests

in our Native American comlrrunity, it seems hard to imagine that

this

proposal

reflects

a deep

love of the land that many in Hunrboldt

coun$',

native

and otherr.vise.

hold

dear.

you

are

well

arvare, the federal Coastal Zone Management

Act

(CZMA)

of 1972 encourages

states to

develop

coastal

managernent

programs

and irnplement the fedelal consistency

procedures

of the CZMA.

Your

staff finds that the

proposed

hotel as described in the

BIA

consistenc), detenrir)atiolr

is inconsistent

r,',ith

Section 3025 | and 30253(e) ofthe

CoastalAct.

since it does

not

protecl

views to and along the ocean and

sccnic coastal

areas

and is not visually compatible

rvith

the character ofsurrounding

areas. This

absolutel;'the

correct finding.

It appcars

BIA has not argued that

full

compliance

rvith

the CCMP

rvould

"prohibited

by existing law," and thus thc

standard of

review for CZMA is applicable

and appropriate

fbr the Coastal Commission to apply. Water Suppll',

Wastewater Treatment,

Traffic, Hazards are inadequately'addressed

tbr

1-our

purposes.

and

present

obvious

problems

for

the

pro.iect.

Sincerell,,

'-\

Maggi

Draper

TI.IL:

701.826.9072

- NI r\ I L :

m a g

h u m b o I

d t

. c o m

While

your

staff

recomrnends rnitigations that

ma)

some

wa) torvard

making this

project

consistetrt

with the lall'. I

question rvhetlrer those mitigations

rvill

be enough

to render the

project

acceptable

especially

vis a vis

with regard to

promoting the tourism that drives

the economies

of both

Trinidad and Cher-Ae

Heights Casino!

generating

money

inrportant.

don't

killlhe

goose

that

la1's

the

golden

egg.

I urge the Commission

vote no on this Consistency

Determinatiotl.

From: karen Schatz

To: Weber, John@Coastal

Subject: trinidad rancheria hotel proposal

Date: Thursday, April 11, 2019 2:48:20 PM

Subject: Trinidad Rancheria hotel proposal

Traffic on Scenic Drive is already excessive (and too fast) making it unsafe for cyclists and

hikers! A direct access via an interchange should be a prerequisite to any expansion project,

and would even be beneficial now. Water supply and disposal are huge concerns as well.

Thank you for providing contact information and adding me to your mailing list. Please

share the following comments at your next meeting.

Sincerely,

Gordon Schatz

EDWARD C. PEASE

PO Box 996

Trinidad, California 95570

TO: John Weber, California Coastal Commission

FR: Ted Pease, Humboldt Alliance for Responsible Planning (HARP)

RE: Petition on Trinidad Rancheria Hotel

May 20, 2019

HARP — Humboldt Alliance for Responsible Planning, a Northern California citizens

organizing group — initiated an online petition to gauge citizen concern over a 5-story, 100-

guestroom Hyatt highrise hotel proposed for the bluff on Trinidad Bay south of Trinidad.

The petition, circulated online (http://chng.it/pkVMT4Vzpg) through Change.org, states in its

entirety:

A five-story high-rise hotel development is wrong for the coast above Trinidad Bay.

Aside from the jarring visual impact of such a structure on a pristine coast, developers

also have not adequately addressed potential negative environmental and resource

impacts; nor has the public been adequately informed about the developers’ plan for a

major Highway 101 interchange to serve the development.

Much more public input and discussion are needed before this project moves forward. I

request that the California Coastal Commission’s hearing on the hotel issue be

convened in Humboldt County to permit local citizens who cannot travel to distant

meeting locations the opportunity to voice their opinions.

As of May 20, 685* people had signed the petition, distributed geographically as follows:

Humboldt County: 298 (43.5%)

Other California: 115 (16.8%)

Other U.S.: 259 (37.8%)

Other: 13 (2%)

The response from people not only in Humboldt County and California is a measure of the value

Americans from all over place on this coastline. Thousands of people travel to Northern

California every year for the redwoods, recreational opportunities and the unparalleled pristine

beauty of the coast especially the seastack-dotted shoreline surrounding Trinidad Bay. This part

of the California Coast, focused on Trinidad Head, which faces the site of the proposed highrise

hotel, has been designated a National Coastal Monument.

The petition, a list of signatories (as of 05/21/19) and comments are attached.

* Total signatures were 750 by Tuesday, May 21, 2019.

encs.

HARp — Humboldt Alliance for Responsible

Planning

 

Recipient: [email protected]

Letter: Greetings,

More public input needed on Trinidad Rancheria hotel plan.

Comments

Name Location Date Comment

Joan Dunning Bayside, CA 2019-04-19 Trinidad Bay is an extraordinary place, unique on all the long coast

of California. It is not only artistically, but also environmentally

absurd to try to wedge a ﬁve-story hotel on one of the cliffs that

surround the bay. I am utterly against it. I walk on Trinidad Head

several times a week and I talk to many of the tourists who stand

in awe of our still pristine coastline. It must be protected for all

Americans and for foreigners, too, who come here looking for

inspiration.

Rebecca Stauffer Bayside, CA 2019-04-19 I'm signing because the plan is ill conceived and inappropriate

for the site. The negative consequences are far out of line for the

beneﬁts.

Nancy Kennedy Eureka, CA 2019-04-19 This proposed building is very wrong for the site. Visually, it will be

intrusive. I do not think the infrastructure will support it. Hearings

need to be held locally and all proposals need to be transparent to

the residents of the local area.

Kirsten Petersen Adin, CA 2019-04-19 I feel that this is not an idea that I and others have had a proper

chance to research, but over the years I have had chances to see

great ideas fail by not having properly investigated the long term

results and having compared like projects that became successes or

failures. The ecosystem of this area is still quite pure and it would be

shame to not take the time to get all the input necessary to improve

rather than pollute this treasure of nature,

Larry Goldberg Trinidad, CA 2019-04-19 This project is totally out of character for our rural community.

Where will the water come from and where will the wastewater go.

It's an eyesore on our beautiful coastline. The tribe has made almost

no effort to work with the local community in the planning for this

project.

DJ Higgiins McKinleyville, CA 2019-04-19 The community that would bear the negative impacts of the hotel

must be allowed to participate in the hearing. To allow participation,

the hearing should be held in Eureka, not 750 miles to the south.

leslie quinn arcata, CA 2019-04-19 the land, water and road cannot support this

Meighan O'Brien McKinleyville, CA 2019-04-20 This hotel expansion is not appropriate for nor is it respectful of

the Trinidad area. The native peoples history as well as the natural

beauty and fragility if the area warrant any additional development

be undertaken with great sensitivity and much more community

input than what this rushed project has received.

Charis Arlett Eureka, CA 2019-04-20 This is SO wrong for this area, not to mention the water & waste

concerns!

Aaron B Durango, CO 2019-04-20 Environmental costs must be considered.

Name Location Date Comment

Sean Stoerrle Bethlehem, PA 2019-04-20 Keep the northcoast pristine and stop this environmentally disgust

from ever happening! I can’t imagine what the true indigenous

would say �

Claire Perricelli Eureka, CA 2019-04-20 This hearing needs to be held on the North Coast. (As does the

CalTrans Safety Corridor project)

Deborah Storm Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-21 This is horriﬁc to even think about. Where is all this human waste

going to go and it would be UGLY!! Don’t ruin our beautiful coastline

for unnecessary greed and pollutin that goes with it!

Erna Drechsler Eureka, CA 2019-04-21 This is the wrong thing for this area. It would mar the beauty and

being in earthquake territory is not good idea.

Deborah OBanks Blue Lake, CA 2019-04-22 Trinadad is a beautiful little town. Please d oknt destroy its beauty

with this monstrosity of a hotel

Jennifer Knight Eureka, CA 2019-04-22 Please spend more time with the community discussing this project.

It will affect the community forever to come.

joanne grace Trinidad, CA 2019-04-22 I have concerns about water. Where will they get the water they

need? I have a well and am concerned the water table will be

depleted. There’s not enough water. In addition the hotel is way to

big on unstable land.

dennis therry bayside, CA 2019-04-23 Shutting out Humboldt County is not in the best interest of the

Coastal Commission or to Humboldt County residents.

Ellen Taylor Eureka, CA 2019-04-23 This monstruosity is an eyesore in and of itself but to stick it in

beautiful Trinidad is an insult to Mother Earth herself!There needs to

be a comprehensive hearing up here where people understand the

entirety of the impacts this project will have if it goes forward.

T L Eureka, CA 2019-04-23 We need to hold off until CA Coastal Commission is here in

Humboldt County. Also, we need CA Coastal Commission here in

Humboldt County to discuss the Eureka to Arcata Corridor plans,

including the logging of 100 year old Eucalyptus trees that deserve

to live and not be logged for a bay trail. Stop fast tracking terrible

plans.

greg movsesyan Manzanita, OR 2019-04-23 If this were a legal case, it would be handled in the jurisdiction

where it occurred. Why is it not true for this regulatory case, as well?

Stan Binnie Arcata, CA 2019-04-23 I think this would ruin the look and feel of the Trinidad area.

Trinidad is known for its scenic beauty and the feeling of a more

rural and wild place. This hotel is something that belongs in Florida

or Waikiki—it is completely incompatible with the North Coast

environment, and I hope the Rancheria will have a change of heart

about what they are proposing.

Bruce Campbell Los Angeles, CA 2019-04-24 A great quake is overdue in the Cascadia Subduction Zone.

Even more moderate quakes will make the proposed 5-story

hotel in currently lovely Trinidad, CA, turn into a crushed body

sandwich.North Coasters should be able to have vocal input on

this important matter. I implore you to hold a Coastal Commission

Name Location Date Comment

hearing in the Humboldt Bay area partially to get local input on this

important matter.Thanks for your consideration.

Cindy and Guy

Kuttner

Arcata, CA 2019-04-24 Let’s keep the human footprint as small as possible.

JEFFREY STEINKAMP Trinidad, CA 2019-04-24 I want the Coastal Commission meeting in Humboldt County for the

Trinidad Rancheria Hotel plan

Veronica Farber Arcata, CA 2019-04-24 Local community members should primary participants in this

discussion. Our accessibility to voice our opinions should be

prioritized because this project affects our local community.

Gloria Purcell Belmont, CA 2019-04-24 Much of CA has been destroyed by development, traﬃc and

pollution. Leave the north coast alone! No more roads (and also

especially through Richardson Grove)!

Marie Petersen P.O. Box 714

Weaverville, CA

2019-04-24 We need to protect the last bits of undeveloped California coast that

we have left. Put it somewhere else!

marisa cross arcata, CA 2019-04-24 Leave well enough alone. Why ruin this coastline with yet more

development, which is the last thing any of us need. Why must

everything be made to look the same. This project would ruin this

unique, pristine spot and there are few places like it left. It will no

longer look like a post card or photogenic with a massive building

in the way. At the very least there should be an open public forum.

But what is there to discuss? This coastline belongs to all of us. This

building is a monstrosity. Ostentatious. I object. Cancel project now.

Stephany Joy Arcata, CA 2019-04-24 I don't think this is needed or able to be properly supported

with water for one thing. I think it is an aesthetic nightmare and

unnecessary. Trinidad is suffering enough with the over abundant

vacation rentals.

Malcolm O'Toole Eureka, CA 2019-04-25 Trinidad is one of the most pristine and beautiful coastal regions

of California. This is because it is NOT disturbed by major

developments and human creations. The hotel will detract from

the natural beauty of the location. It is just as ridiculous as building

a hotel in the middle of a national or state park. I have also yet to

hear of an opportunity for input for indigenous people who have

lived in the Trinidad area for generations. The plans for this building

should not proceed without a proper vessel for people who live

in or regularly enjoy Trinidad to voice their concerns. There are

few coastal places in California which are undisturbed by human

development, and they should be preserved so that they can be

enjoyed and respected. Environmental impacts of the development

are also a major concern for many individuals.

Gail Stewart Seattle, US 2019-04-25 Nooo. What a mistake this would be. On so many levels!!

Cynthia Louis Fort Collins, CO 2019-04-25 Trinidad is a magical historical and environmental gem that should

not evolve into a Cancun-like attraction for so many reasons. The

infrastructure and damage to the environment is not worth the cost.

There are better ways to non intrusively invest in the community. As

a long ago resident, I am opposed to this type of development.

Name Location Date Comment

meaghan simpson Fortuna, CA 2019-04-25 I am a long term local for 36 years and enjoy all parts of our NW CA

coastline communities and businesses. I ﬁnd the proposal for the 5

story or 3 story or whatever story hotel and 101 access and traﬃc,

etc... to be TOO BIG, TOO COMMERCIAL, TOO NOT TRINIDAD!!!Of

course I have not ever enjoyed the Gambling Casinos that have

invaded USA. I love our Native American Indians... and I have 4 or

5 tribes blood running in my veins... but not gambling, alcohol and

indoor smoking!!!

Johnny Imgrund Minneapolis, MN 2019-04-27 That’s one of the most beautiful stretches of beachfront on the

Paciﬁc Northwest. Also the most fragile. This is not sustainable.

sajha eden arcata, CA 2019-04-28 I want the beauty of Trinidad to be protected, not torn down for

business. Let's use common sense!

Judith Wright Dayton, VA 2019-04-30 Not good. Please think about all the future problems.

kai hill trinidad, CA 2019-05-01 I live inTrinidad and this monstrosity will ruin our coastline.

DONNA ULRICH Arcata, US 2019-05-01 I'm signing because I want to see Trinidad and the North Coast keep

its character. A high-rise hotel just doesn't do that.

A Grau Trinidad, CA 2019-05-01 This project would forever diminish the environment and the

quality of life for countless residents of and visitors to this pristine

coastline.

Kay Schulz Trinidad, CA 2019-05-03 I believe that this hotel does not ﬁt into the viewscape of the

surrounding area. Water availability is a concern as is the problem

with sewage.

Melissa Carrau Eureka, CA 2019-05-03 It's absurd! Looks ridiculous a nd totally out of place. The road is

falling apart, more traﬃc will kill it. Smaller, lower proﬁle....

Peter Aronson Arcata, CA 2019-05-07 Trinidad doesn’t deserve or want to ruin ‘rural’ building themes with

a structure like this.

Peter Manso Truro, MA 2019-05-13 Petet Manso

Jan Hunt Bayside, CA 2019-05-18 When our house was built, we were required to make it "disappear"

into the coastline. If this project goes forward, I would like to see

similar requirements to make it blend in to the environment,

using colors and materials that diminish its look. And the water

issues need to be carefully studied to see if Trinidad is even able to

supply the needs of such a huge water user. It is important that a

community has a major say in such a community-changing project.

Mary Campbell Arcata, CA 2019-05-19 No need for hotel that size in Trinidad. Simply, ridiculous.

Karin Rosman El Cerrito, CA 2019-05-19 The local residents deserve access to input on this important issue. I

live in the SF Bay Area and I’m following this

Toby Vanlandingham Klamath, CA 2019-05-19 I believe the current proposed water usage and environmental

impact report is horribly underestimated and needs a thorough 3rd

party review before this project is put on the table for approval.

Name Location Date Comment

Diane Anderson Arcata, CA 2019-05-20 A great deal more investigating of the environmental impacts

still needs to be done! Not to mention how sad it is that the

Native population there is involved in constructing such a

metro-monstrosity on this sacred piece of earth.

HARp — Humboldt Alliance for Responsible

Planning

 

Recipient: [email protected]

Letter: Greetings,

More public input needed on Trinidad Rancheria hotel plan.

Signatures

Name Location Date

Ted Pease Trinidad, CA 2019-04-19

Carol Mone Trinidad, CA 2019-04-19

Patricia Morales Trinidad, US 2019-04-19

Elizabeth Whitley Kneeland, US 2019-04-19

Peder Pedersen Eureka, CA 2019-04-19

James Vandegriff Trinidad, CA 2019-04-19

Don Bremm Trinidad, CA 2019-04-19

Joyce Rodgers Trinidad, US 2019-04-19

Ken Miller McKinleyville, US 2019-04-19

Alexa Day Fortuna, CA 2019-04-19

Jennifer Kalt Mckinleyville, US 2019-04-19

Debby Harrison Sacramento, US 2019-04-19

Tristan Theron Tucson, US 2019-04-19

Joan Dunning Bayside, CA 2019-04-19

JON INWOOD Brooklyn, NY 2019-04-19

Trevor Keiber Arcata, CA 2019-04-19

Rebecca Stauffer Bayside, CA 2019-04-19

Nancy Kennedy Eureka, CA 2019-04-19

Howard Russell Eureka, CA 2019-04-19

Linda Hartshorn Eureka, CA 2019-04-19

Name Location Date

Patricia LeGary Eureka, CA 2019-04-19

Kathryn Stotler McKinleyville, US 2019-04-19

Robert Chapman Blue Lake, US 2019-04-19

Kirsten Petersen Adin, CA 2019-04-19

Nic Gadouas Trinidad, US 2019-04-19

Beryl Feldman Atlanta, US 2019-04-19

Jason Nguyen Minneapolis, US 2019-04-19

Neal Steinberg US 2019-04-19

DONNA ULRICH Arcata, US 2019-04-19

Michael Morris Arcata, CA 2019-04-19

Richard Salzman Eureka, US 2019-04-19

David Deems Roseville, US 2019-04-19

Peter Jain Arcata, US 2019-04-19

Linnea Clompus Trinidad, CA 2019-04-19

Michelle Dougherty Eureka, US 2019-04-19

ishan vernallis arcata, US 2019-04-19

Katherine Perry Bayside, CA 2019-04-19

Kathleen Mill Richmond, US 2019-04-19

Katie Darden Mexicali, Mexico 2019-04-19

Kristin Dwan Altadena, US 2019-04-19

Lucas Thornton Eureka, CA 2019-04-19

Kim Pinches Eureka, CA 2019-04-19

Name Location Date

carol v klune Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-19

Larry Goldberg Trinidad, CA 2019-04-19

Diane Camp Forest Rsnch, CA 2019-04-19

Diane Higgins McKinleyville, US 2019-04-19

Mindy Hiley Trinidad, US 2019-04-19

Don Allan Arcata, CA 2019-04-19

Jessica Friedlander Rio Dell, CA 2019-04-19

Brenda Cooper Eureka, US 2019-04-19

Gretchen Sudlow Blue Lake, CA 2019-04-19

Shannya Andrade Orange Park, US 2019-04-19

Carol Lee alderpoint, CA 2019-04-19

Simona Carini US 2019-04-19

leslie quinn arcata, CA 2019-04-19

Jason Self Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-19

Carol Conaway McKinleyville, US 2019-04-19

Melody Hamilton Eureka, CA 2019-04-19

Tarnisha Ambeau Pompano Beach, US 2019-04-20

Damon Ring Fortuna, CA 2019-04-20

Kristen Bailey Tacoma, US 2019-04-20

Meighan O'Brien McKinleyville, CA 2019-04-20

Kari Vandiver Arcata, CA 2019-04-20

Blake Lane Newport Beach, CA 2019-04-20

Name Location Date

Kathleen Kinkela-Love Arcata, US 2019-04-20

Katherine LaForge Eureka, CA 2019-04-20

Samantha Love Arcata, CA 2019-04-20

Susan Twomey Arcata, US 2019-04-20

Jon Lefebvre Phoenix, AZ 2019-04-20

Charis Arlett Eureka, CA 2019-04-20

Caroline Hall Blue Lake, CA 2019-04-20

Julie Gentry Durango, CO 2019-04-20

Ludy Hawe Binghamton, US 2019-04-20

Dreher Robertson Durango, CO 2019-04-20

Wayne Self Plano, US 2019-04-20

Tyler Wright Dallas, US 2019-04-20

James Vaughn Boulder, US 2019-04-20

Crystal Dobbs Loleta, US 2019-04-20

Renee French Austin, TX 2019-04-20

Fran Dutro Erie, CO 2019-04-20

Martha Webb Seattle, WA 2019-04-20

Zion Adler Flagstaff, AZ 2019-04-20

laura Dees quaker hill, US 2019-04-20

elliott levin Trinidad, CA 2019-04-20

Judy houck Arcata, CA 2019-04-20

Tom Webb Oakland, US 2019-04-20

Name Location Date

Forrest Stone Durango, US 2019-04-20

Mackenzie Martin Humble, US 2019-04-20

Ben Zimmerman Oakland, US 2019-04-20

Melissa McCall Mckinleyville, US 2019-04-20

Ron Baron North Richland Hills, TX 2019-04-20

Temprest Lloyd Austin, US 2019-04-20

marion shaw shasta lake, CA 2019-04-20

Christa Whittington Boulder, CO 2019-04-20

Jayson Drexler steamboat springs, CO 2019-04-20

Carol Nunez Northport, NY 2019-04-20

Paula Hyatt Austin, TX 2019-04-20

Katrina Curry Folsom, CA 2019-04-20

Bob Cavers Eureka, US 2019-04-20

Donna smith Wilmington, NC 2019-04-20

Chris Dollinger Cypress, TX 2019-04-20

Aaron B Durango, CO 2019-04-20

Tricia Gourley Aurora, CO 2019-04-20

Sean Stoerrle Bethlehem, PA 2019-04-20

Tristan Stanton Dodgeville, US 2019-04-20

Jessica Seibert Cape Coral, US 2019-04-20

Betty Alvey Irving, US 2019-04-20

Laura Dedmon Ithaca, US 2019-04-20

Name Location Date

Jane Boynton Bar Harbor, US 2019-04-20

Jenny Hutchinson McKinleyville, CA 2019-04-20

Sara March Arcata, CA 2019-04-20

Nancy Sawyer Los Alamitos, US 2019-04-20

Krista Waldron Denver, CO 2019-04-20

Lori Keating Trinidad, CA 2019-04-20

Roy Albert Corvallis, US 2019-04-20

Barbara Stach Blue Lake, CA 2019-04-20

Linda Guild San Diego, US 2019-04-20

Jasmin Segura Bayside, US 2019-04-20

Sherry McCoy Arcata, CA 2019-04-20

Samuel Whitlach Fortuna, US 2019-04-20

Kim Keating San Pedro, CA 2019-04-20

Linda Long Trinidad, CA 2019-04-20

Lee Rossi Los Angeles, CA 2019-04-20

Kathleen Pelley Eureka, CA 2019-04-20

Luna Allison Durango, CO 2019-04-20

Richard Walter Trinidad, CA 2019-04-20

Gregory Stokes McKinleyville, CA 2019-04-20

Valerie Allen Arcata, CA 2019-04-20

Sara Bradley Clarksville, US 2019-04-20

Claire Perricelli Eureka, CA 2019-04-20

Name Location Date

Frank Grootenboer Grand Ledge, MI 2019-04-20

Amy Diekmeyer San Jose, CA 2019-04-21

Linda Parkinson McKinleyville, CA 2019-04-21

Mary Stanleigh San Rafael, CA 2019-04-21

Jessica Marlowe Easton, CT 2019-04-21

Deborah Storm Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-21

Teresa Apodaca Whittier, US 2019-04-21

Utkarsh Nath Fremont, US 2019-04-21

Clay Drake Dixon, US 2019-04-21

Laura McNulty Eureka, CA 2019-04-21

Justin Love Eureka, CA 2019-04-21

Lynette Malizia Fiskdale, US 2019-04-21

Omar Romo National City, US 2019-04-21

Gary Silver Arcata, CA 2019-04-21

Judi Scharnberg Eureka, CA 2019-04-21

Barbara Bradford Rock Hill, SC 2019-04-21

Amy Peller Garden Grove, CA 2019-04-21

Justin Mathewson ada, US 2019-04-21

Stephanie Silvia Trinidad, CA 2019-04-21

Diana Castro Minneapolis, US 2019-04-21

Debora Green Manhattan, US 2019-04-21

mike durgerian arcadia, CA 2019-04-21

Name Location Date

Erna Drechsler Eureka, CA 2019-04-21

Brett Shuler Arcata, CA 2019-04-21

Don Mill Richmond, US 2019-04-21

Lynn Anderson Albany, OR 2019-04-21

Rebecca Chadwick Atlanta, US 2019-04-21

Genevieve Keeney Houston, US 2019-04-21

Chris Joslin Papillion, US 2019-04-21

Xavier Martinez San Ramon, US 2019-04-21

Tiffany Le Newtown, US 2019-04-21

Sariah Franco Saint Cloud, US 2019-04-21

Tim Lai Bronx, US 2019-04-21

Dawson DuPuis Durango, CO 2019-04-21

Serena Moore Carmel, IN 2019-04-21

Alice De Mark Blue Lake, CA 2019-04-21

Brenda Leppo Hillsboro, OR 2019-04-21

Savannah Tran Farmington, US 2019-04-21

Shane Keller Arcata, CA 2019-04-21

Dana Stevens Eureka, US 2019-04-21

Georgia Kramer Chico, CA 2019-04-21

Marcus Turk Bronx, US 2019-04-21

Manuel Puebla Vacaville, US 2019-04-21

Hector Mercado Glendora, US 2019-04-21

Name Location Date

Delilah Jackson Winterville, US 2019-04-21

Jeffrey Donohoe Gurnee, US 2019-04-21

Michelle Benedum Victorville, US 2019-04-21

Anthony Ramos Bridgeport, US 2019-04-21

Richard Coreno Cleveland, US 2019-04-21

Danielle Jenkins Salem, US 2019-04-22

Sharon Winnett Trinidad, US 2019-04-22

Richard Page Eureka, CA 2019-04-22

Deborah OBanks Blue Lake, CA 2019-04-22

Barbara Kennedy Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-22

Chad Van Ness Sonora, CA 2019-04-22

Jill Murray Santa Barbara, CA 2019-04-22

Erin Rowe Trinidad, CA 2019-04-22

Jennifer Knight Eureka, CA 2019-04-22

Thomas Ryan Mountain Lakes, US 2019-04-22

Tracey Cake Greensboro, US 2019-04-22

Gabriel Grimes Jupiter, US 2019-04-22

Alyssa Jones Sonora, US 2019-04-22

Chase Kassel Durango, US 2019-04-22

Hannah Belton Arcata, US 2019-04-22

joanne grace Trinidad, CA 2019-04-22

Steen Trump Trinidad, CA 2019-04-22

Name Location Date

kelsey lambott Atlanta, US 2019-04-22

princess em miami, US 2019-04-22

Marsha Woolard Poplar Bluff, US 2019-04-22

Stacey Barker Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-22

Alice DiMicele Medford, OR 2019-04-23

Leah Kot Newington, US 2019-04-23

Susan Lauren Van Nuys, CA 2019-04-23

Ben Vang Saint Paul, US 2019-04-23

Vincent Romeo Warsaw, US 2019-04-23

Keith Lachmayer Gloversville, US 2019-04-23

Jess Miller Seattle, US 2019-04-23

Chris Miller El Segundo, CA 2019-04-23

Ronald Blatt Louisville, US 2019-04-23

Lindsay Lubeskie Dallas, TX 2019-04-23

Emily Wood ALderpoint, CA 2019-04-23

Bella Waters US 2019-04-23

Mallory Flamm La Crosse, US 2019-04-23

Robin Hamlin McKinleyville, US 2019-04-23

Kim Hollinger Arcata, CA 2019-04-23

Carrie Tully McKinleyville, CA 2019-04-23

dennis therry bayside, CA 2019-04-23

Lina Carro Arcata, US 2019-04-23

Name Location Date

Evelyn Gustafson Eureka, CA 2019-04-23

Ellen Taylor Eureka, CA 2019-04-23

Marta Zelaya Redwood City, CA 2019-04-23

Jonathan Lee Santa Rosa, CA 2019-04-23

Sylvia Shaw Rancho Cordova, CA 2019-04-23

Linda Yonts Ferndale, US 2019-04-23

Pete Nichols Trinidad, US 2019-04-23

Richard Johnson Trinidad, US 2019-04-23

Ethan Allar Marshﬁeld, US 2019-04-23

Pamela Maxﬁeld Eureka, US 2019-04-23

T L Eureka, CA 2019-04-23

Stephen Hamilton Trinidad, US 2019-04-23

Ivy North Arcata, CA 2019-04-23

Ronald Thompson Roseburg, US 2019-04-23

greg movsesyan Manzanita, OR 2019-04-23

Robert Jamgochian Arcata, CA 2019-04-23

Kimberly Tays Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-23

Desiree Martin Arcata, US 2019-04-23

Christopher Cole Trinidad, US 2019-04-23

Stanley Binnie Arcata, US 2019-04-23

Jeanne Padgett Orlando, US 2019-04-23

Debra Bates Valrico, US 2019-04-23

Name Location Date

Kathleen Lo Galbo Valparaiso, US 2019-04-23

Carl Frazzano Roswell, US 2019-04-23

Richard Ballew Cloudcroft, US 2019-04-23

Sophia Pelaﬁgue Arcata, CA 2019-04-23

Lee Ulansey Hanalei, US 2019-04-23

Lilyanne Price Arcata, CA 2019-04-23

Judith Mayer Antelope, US 2019-04-23

Cory william McKinleyville, CA 2019-04-23

Bruce Cann San Francisco, US 2019-04-23

Malia Solomon Van Nuys, CA 2019-04-23

Kit Davenport Arcata, CA 2019-04-23

Bradley Medaris Oroville, US 2019-04-23

Eileen Jennis-Sauppe Eureka, US 2019-04-23

Rudy Ramp Arcata, CA 2019-04-23

Kimberly Cabot Arcata, CA 2019-04-23

Mark Cortright Eureka, CA 2019-04-23

jamuna priya Etna, CA 2019-04-23

Charles and Margaret Herbelin Eureka, CA 2019-04-23

Bob Earl Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-23

Linda Miller Eureka, CA 2019-04-23

Greg Jaso Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-23

Sylvia Cardella Hydesville, CA 2019-04-23

Name Location Date

Damon Berkowitz San Francisco, US 2019-04-23

Keith MacLeod Vancouver, WA 2019-04-23

Buzz Parker Arcata, US 2019-04-23

Leah Berman Aptos, CA 2019-04-23

Diana Minton Arcata, CA 2019-04-23

Jan Nash Hunt Bayside, CA 2019-04-23

Chetco Jamgochian Santa Rosa, CA 2019-04-23

Gail Kenny Eureka, CA 2019-04-23

Petra Bingham Arcata, CA 2019-04-24

Bruce Campbell Los Angeles, CA 2019-04-24

Jeff Dillion Eureka, US 2019-04-24

Bob Felter McKinleyville, US 2019-04-24

Tristan Cole Trinidad, US 2019-04-24

Stacy Becker Eureka, US 2019-04-24

Cindy and Guy Kuttner Arcata, CA 2019-04-24

Gary Falxa Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

JEFFREY STEINKAMP Trinidad, CA 2019-04-24

Barbara Burns ARCATA, CA 2019-04-24

Joseph MacTurk Eureka, US 2019-04-24

Jude Power Bayside, US 2019-04-24

Veronica Farber Arcata, CA 2019-04-24

chris alford Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

Name Location Date

MaryAnn Madej ARCATA, CA 2019-04-24

Katherine Bettis Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

Joyce King McKinleyville, CA 2019-04-24

Terry Wingenbach Eureka, US 2019-04-24

Jacob Hanneman Chino Hills, CA 2019-04-24

Jesse Noell Eureka, US 2019-04-24

catie eyer Boise, ID 2019-04-24

Gloria Purcell Belmont, CA 2019-04-24

Michael Lasher Germany 2019-04-24

Sb Sieiwh San Diego, US 2019-04-24

Janelle Egger Fortuna, CA 2019-04-24

Patricia Stearns Eureka, US 2019-04-24

Leslie Mcdonne Citrus Heights, US 2019-04-24

Jackson Nettleship Los Angles, US 2019-04-24

Beth Bennion McKinleyville, CA 2019-04-24

Rachel Dilthey Trinidad, CA 2019-04-24

Jennifer Elling New York, NY 2019-04-24

Emelia Berol Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

Marie Petersen P.O. Box 714 Weaverville, CA 2019-04-24

Kelley Vazquez Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

Barbara Brimlow Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

Kristin Wall Eatontown, NJ 2019-04-24

Name Location Date

Catherine Desantis Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-24

Michael Christian Bayside, CA 2019-04-24

Camille PORTER Berkeley, CA 2019-04-24

Judi Reichart San Rafael, CA 2019-04-24

Jim Elferdink Mckinleyville, US 2019-04-24

Steve Brudney Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-24

Joy Hardin Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-24

Bryan Dillon Occidental, CA 2019-04-24

Bruce Hales Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

Melinda Bailey Kneeland, US 2019-04-24

Brent Gudzus Windsor, US 2019-04-24

George Seremwe Harare, Zimbabwe 2019-04-24

Linda Doerﬂinger Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-24

Alicia Adrian Blue Lake, US 2019-04-24

Jonathan Kolp Central Point, US 2019-04-24

Gerald C Rees Mckinleyville, US 2019-04-24

Lorraine Miller-Wolf Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

Twila Sanchez Mckinleyville, US 2019-04-24

The God Franklin, US 2019-04-24

Chris Callahan Arcata, CA 2019-04-24

Aryay Kalaki Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

marisa cross arcata, CA 2019-04-24

Name Location Date

Tom Hinz Willow Creek, US 2019-04-24

Ariel Graham Arcata, CA 2019-04-24

caty reed Alberton, South Africa 2019-04-24

Stephany Joy Arcata, CA 2019-04-24

Susan Dunn Nevada City, CA 2019-04-24

William and Bernardine

Hansell

Eureka, US 2019-04-24

Bob Sullivan FAIR OAKS, CA 2019-04-24

Kathryn Donahue Eureka, US 2019-04-24

Randy Klein Arcata, US 2019-04-24

John Webb Trinidad, CA 2019-04-24

Keri Raphael Salyer, CA 2019-04-24

Susan Daniel Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-24

Whitney Hicks Lakeland, US 2019-04-24

Nancy Ihara Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

Raquel Karno Oceanside, CA 2019-04-24

Tiffany Perez Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

Susie Foot Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-24

Betina Garsen Arcata, US 2019-04-24

Joseph Szewczak Arcata, CA 2019-04-24

Deborah Ketelsen Bayside, CA 2019-04-24

Bernard Calot Fort Lauderdale, US 2019-04-24

Name Location Date

Margaret Brown Fullerton, CA 2019-04-24

Barbara Reisman Arcata, CA 2019-04-24

Gloria Hollister Newark, US 2019-04-24

kiley pitts plymouth, US 2019-04-24

Gregg Gold Arcata, US 2019-04-24

Suzanne Simpson Arcata, CA 2019-04-24

brandi soderberg Fortuna, CA 2019-04-24

Sylvia De Rooy Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

Delaney Tamm Buffalo, US 2019-04-24

Rudy Ramp Arcata, CA 2019-04-24

Julie Ryan Eureka, CA 2019-04-24

Jayna Nix Arcata, US 2019-04-24

Greg Freer Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-24

Michael McLaughlin Eureka, US 2019-04-25

Garry Vineyard Madras, US 2019-04-25

ﬁnn scott-neff trinidad, CA 2019-04-25

Jeff Dobronyi Driggs, ID 2019-04-25

Mary Hurley Eureka, CA 2019-04-25

Jerry Martien Eureka, CA 2019-04-25

John Danel Daniel Mckinleyville, US 2019-04-25

Kay Schaser Eureka, CA 2019-04-25

andy araneo Eureka, US 2019-04-25

Name Location Date

Pat Hog Seattle, US 2019-04-25

Erin Rowe Trinidad, CA 2019-04-25

Steve Salzman Mckinleyville, CA 2019-04-25

J Taylor Arcata, US 2019-04-25

Michael Bankston Grass Valley, CA 2019-04-25

Susan Morton Eureka, CA 2019-04-25

Mark Deming Ypsilanti, MI 2019-04-25

Francis Upton Oakland, CA 2019-04-25

Ann Wallace Blue Lake, CA 2019-04-25

Kathleen Kelcey Mckinleyville, US 2019-04-25

Malcolm O'Toole Eureka, US 2019-04-25

Laura Wellman San Anselmo, CA 2019-04-25

Lori Meadows US 2019-04-25

Brett Moody Anchorage, US 2019-04-25

Gail Stewart Seattle, US 2019-04-25

Donald Walker Arcata, CA 2019-04-25

Jose Carlos Navarro Solis Oakland, US 2019-04-25

Anna Hamilton Eureka, CA 2019-04-25

samantha everett Eureka, CA 2019-04-25

Laura Glauberman Redway, CA 2019-04-25

Nicole Holland Eureka, CA 2019-04-25

Holly Portman Eureka, US 2019-04-25

Name Location Date

Tim Bacon Raleigh, US 2019-04-25

Robin Friedman Eureka, CA 2019-04-25

Jeremy Reavers Cary, US 2019-04-25

Morris Reavers Cary, US 2019-04-25

Dominick BUONOMO Kearny, US 2019-04-25

Anigha Pierce Hartford, US 2019-04-25

Mike Callinan District Heights, US 2019-04-25

Jamie Disbrow Brick, US 2019-04-25

Keegan Connors Carpentersville, US 2019-04-25

Chan Mullins Denver, US 2019-04-25

Cynthia Louis Fort Collins, CO 2019-04-25

Genevieve Fawcett Palm Desert, US 2019-04-25

AD Godley Aromas, CA 2019-04-25

Bob leners Boulder, US 2019-04-25

Amber Biermann Sheboygan Falls, US 2019-04-25

Lisa Bethune Arcata, US 2019-04-25

David S Bronx, US 2019-04-25

John Paul Port orange, US 2019-04-25

Steven Muratalla Palm Springs, US 2019-04-25

Daniella Opalach Arcata, US 2019-04-25

Rachel Leigh Plainﬁeld, US 2019-04-25

meaghan simpson Fortuna, CA 2019-04-25

Name Location Date

Susan Kavel Pleasant Valley, CT 2019-04-25

Carrie Gleason Littleton, CO 2019-04-25

Karen Rice Kneeland, US 2019-04-25

Daniel Gutierrez Sacramento, US 2019-04-25

William Slonaker Ocoee, US 2019-04-25

Caterina Zannino Delta, US 2019-04-25

Diana Mai Stanton, US 2019-04-25

Nymiah Eliyahu Eureka, US 2019-04-25

Abagail Stallworth Tulsa, US 2019-04-25

Javier Monroig Bronx, US 2019-04-25

Dennis K Eureka, US 2019-04-25

Bonita Barrett Wellington, US 2019-04-25

crystal muzik moab, US 2019-04-25

Mike Higaki Bryn Mawr, US 2019-04-25

Janet Peterson Troy, US 2019-04-25

Halimah Collingwood Arcata, CA 2019-04-25

Elijah Groves Muncie, US 2019-04-25

Annalisa Gomez Alhambra, US 2019-04-25

cecil lindsey Broomﬁeld, US 2019-04-25

Sophia Crouch Durham, US 2019-04-25

Tatiana Furcron Columbus, US 2019-04-26

Kristi Wrigley Eureka, CA 2019-04-26

Name Location Date

Jessica Garcia US 2019-04-26

[email protected]

Bonnell

Edwardsburg, US 2019-04-26

Maryann Wainstock New York, US 2019-04-26

Bailey May Roseburg, US 2019-04-26

Henry Santos Sylmar, US 2019-04-26

Wendy Harden McKinleyville, US 2019-04-26

Parisa Jebelli Moreno Valley, US 2019-04-26

linda kutil Eureka, CA 2019-04-26

Helen Gale Eureka, CA 2019-04-26

John Hennings Eureka, US 2019-04-26

steve Peppercorn ashland, OR 2019-04-26

Emme Dreffs Fort Wayne, US 2019-04-26

Sarah Pena Santa Barbara, US 2019-04-26

Brittany Newsome Tampa, US 2019-04-26

Randal Rowan Atlanta, US 2019-04-26

Emma Weinstein Tarpon Springs, US 2019-04-26

janith Randika Mansﬁeld, US 2019-04-26

Stephanie Curin Weimar, CA 2019-04-26

kelsie dye Charleston, US 2019-04-26

Linda Copeland US 2019-04-26

Janaka DeSilva Claremont, US 2019-04-26

Name Location Date

Alyssa Fox Simpsonville, US 2019-04-26

Samantha Gregerman Glenview, US 2019-04-26

Danielle Munoz US 2019-04-26

stephen phines eureka, CA 2019-04-26

Deborah Ford Fort Scott, US 2019-04-26

Erin Arndt Wellington, CO 2019-04-26

Richard West Moultonborough, US 2019-04-26

Cristion Kjeldgard Miami, US 2019-04-26

Matas Kirda Chicago, US 2019-04-26

Michael Johnstone East Orange, US 2019-04-26

John Collins Keller, US 2019-04-26

Abigail Anaya Victorville, US 2019-04-26

Ron Winterstein San Francisco, US 2019-04-26

Lisa Keesling Trinidad, US 2019-04-26

Emilio Rodriguez Katy, US 2019-04-26

Cathy Stickles Cranford, US 2019-04-26

Skylar Ray Newton, US 2019-04-26

Cordrea Tyler Halethorpe, US 2019-04-26

sara sims Richmond, US 2019-04-26

david smith US 2019-04-27

Michael Hillerich Bend, US 2019-04-27

Lisa Wright Richmond, US 2019-04-27

Name Location Date

Allison Ruiz Barrios San Bruno, US 2019-04-27

Desirae Soliz Coachella, US 2019-04-27

elaine addington Alamogordo, US 2019-04-27

Nyerah Mack Toms River, US 2019-04-27

bernadette wheeler Lancaster, US 2019-04-27

Anna Maria Kawuryan Falls Church, US 2019-04-27

Anita Gilbride-Read McKinleyville, US 2019-04-27

Yunis Luworo Eugene, US 2019-04-27

josh satterﬁeld Steamboat Springs, US 2019-04-27

Ashley Rivera New York, US 2019-04-27

Keith Porter Winston-Salem, US 2019-04-27

Rosaria Tyre Macon, US 2019-04-27

Alexis Simon Kissimmee, US 2019-04-27

Charles Minton Bayside, CA 2019-04-27

grace campbell drexel hill, US 2019-04-27

Elton Dedaj Bronx, US 2019-04-27

Alante Jenkins Warren, US 2019-04-27

Michaela Foster Springﬁeld, US 2019-04-27

Colin Ruch Indianapolis, US 2019-04-27

Aubrey Cook Elizabethtown, US 2019-04-27

Patrick Jone Brooklyn, US 2019-04-27

Aliyah Sanghvi San Diego, US 2019-04-27

Name Location Date

Stephanie Diaz Escondido, US 2019-04-27

Jacqueline Raines Central Islip, US 2019-04-27

Craig Herron Walnut Cove, US 2019-04-27

Sabrina Limas West Palm Beach, US 2019-04-27

Oof Noom Schaumburg, US 2019-04-27

maddy cooper Broken Arrow, US 2019-04-27

Eileen McGee Eureka, CA 2019-04-27

Johnny Imgrund Minneapolis, MN 2019-04-27

Janette Hernandez Los Angeles, US 2019-04-27

Ann Morrissey Chico, US 2019-04-28

Nancy White Minneapolis, US 2019-04-28

KonRad White Aurora, US 2019-04-28

Isabella Leak Montclair, US 2019-04-28

Harrison McCormack Pittsburg, US 2019-04-28

Tyren Fairconnetue Lynwood, US 2019-04-28

Todd Dixon Trinidad, CA 2019-04-28

Daniela Soto San Diego, CA 2019-04-28

naomi hoffman Framingham, US 2019-04-28

John Griggs Winston Salem, US 2019-04-28

Marcia Brenta Sacramento, CA 2019-04-28

Andrea Navarrete Washington, US 2019-04-28

Catalina Rojas Sugar Hill, US 2019-04-28

Name Location Date

DeAndre Franklin Imperial Beach, US 2019-04-28

ihave bigears North Las Vegas, US 2019-04-28

Sandra Underwood Bozeman, US 2019-04-28

sajha eden arcata, CA 2019-04-28

Lynn Moffat Sleepy Hollow, NY 2019-04-28

Kassie Johnson Proctorville, US 2019-04-28

margaret draper arcata, US 2019-04-28

Holly Binczewski Waltham, US 2019-04-29

Monique Manz Pharr, US 2019-04-29

Pat Self Arcata, CA 2019-04-29

Issabella Ortiz Chicago, US 2019-04-29

Jen Goldman Grantsburg, WI 2019-04-29

Judith Wright Dayton, VA 2019-04-30

Susan Mecartney San Jose, CA 2019-04-30

Maria Bartlett Arcata, US 2019-05-01

Sandra Haux Trinidad, US 2019-05-01

Larella Moore Arcata, US 2019-05-01

Julian Morales Trinidad, US 2019-05-01

kai hill trinidad, CA 2019-05-01

Margaret Kellermann Trinidad, CA 2019-05-01

Jaana Prall Arcata, US 2019-05-01

Christine Hills Trinidad, CA 2019-05-01

Name Location Date

Cindy Johnson Trinidad, US 2019-05-01

Mari Dominguez Linden, US 2019-05-01

Trystyn Torralva Ewa Beach, US 2019-05-01

Ellen Golla Trinidad, CA 2019-05-01

Christopher Manville Trinidad, US 2019-05-01

Andrew Pierce Trinidad, US 2019-05-01

Leslie Zondervan-Droz Trinidad, CA 2019-05-01

Richard Kieselhorst Eureka, US 2019-05-01

Clay Johnson Trinidad, CA 2019-05-01

gerardo lara Baldwin Park, US 2019-05-01

Diane Bacon Auburn, US 2019-05-01

Dorothy Cox Eureka, CA 2019-05-01

A Grau Trinidad, CA 2019-05-01

Kaleolani Lehano Honolulu, US 2019-05-01

Jakaoskw Kaisisosk Richmond, US 2019-05-01

Dick Weed US 2019-05-01

Kelly Peterson McKinleyville, CA 2019-05-01

Angelina McLellan Lincoln, US 2019-05-01

Leave Painting Winchester, US 2019-05-01

Allison Roper Kill Devil Hills, US 2019-05-01

whew chile Clarksville, US 2019-05-01

Luis Rodriguez Miami Beach, US 2019-05-01

Name Location Date

Jacqueline Holmes Eureka, CA 2019-05-01

Lore Snell Eureka, US 2019-05-01

Mariana Ruiz Houston, US 2019-05-01

Aubrey Lazuli Grand Prairie, US 2019-05-01

McKenna Granato Kailua, US 2019-05-01

Danielle Ferguson Trinidad, CA 2019-05-01

Monica Bueno McKinleyville, CA 2019-05-01

SALLY RENLUND Trinidad, CA 2019-05-02

whitaker boatright Atlanta, US 2019-05-02

Tracie Andersen Newton, US 2019-05-02

Jennifer Pierce Eureka, US 2019-05-02

Megan Valencia Seguin, US 2019-05-02

Joe Ellis Media, PA 2019-05-02

Nicolas Cucinella Van Nuys, US 2019-05-02

Jeffrey Vunder Tujunga, US 2019-05-02

caitlyn smith Kirkland, US 2019-05-02

annalisa Rush Trinidad, US 2019-05-02

Courtney Blake McKinleyville, CA 2019-05-02

Jon Dela Cruz Waipahu, US 2019-05-02

Beverly Zeman Trinidad, US 2019-05-02

Don Zeman Trinidad, US 2019-05-02

Rebecca Smith US 2019-05-02

Name Location Date

Braylon Gayle Pﬂugerville, US 2019-05-02

Stephanie Hartwell Santa fe, US 2019-05-02

Ernesto Baray Garcia Denver, US 2019-05-02

Luana Crider Belleville, MI 2019-05-02

Jacqueline Pollard Fort Bragg, US 2019-05-02

Shandon Spiller Lovelady, US 2019-05-02

Aaron Brink Arcata, US 2019-05-02

bill cosby stafford, US 2019-05-02

breb turnip Elma, US 2019-05-02

Julie Bradford Alabama 2019-05-02

Lena Scanlan Waimanalo, US 2019-05-02

Vita Talamantes Los Angeles, US 2019-05-02

Courtney McMurtry Hosford, US 2019-05-02

Tom Hopkins Mckinleyville, CA 2019-05-02

Ezequiel Mora-Preciado Van Nuys, US 2019-05-02

Ashlee Ai Hilo, US 2019-05-02

Jess MacMillan San Luis Obispo, CA 2019-05-02

Laurie Lawrence Eureka, US 2019-05-03

Amanda Grether Pompano Beach, US 2019-05-03

Ryan Hutson Eureka, US 2019-05-03

Melissa Zielinski Eureka, US 2019-05-03

Cody Carpluk Middle Village, US 2019-05-03

Name Location Date

pat kanzler eureka, CA 2019-05-03

Cathy Schmall Mckinleyville, CA 2019-05-03

Carl Brooks Austin, US 2019-05-03

Antonia Granados West Palm Beach, US 2019-05-03

Gayle Raymer McKinleyville, CA 2019-05-03

Pamela West McKinleyville, CA 2019-05-03

C Limehouse Charleston, US 2019-05-03

Janelle Egger Fortuna, US 2019-05-03

Winchell Dillenbeck Mckinleyville, US 2019-05-03

Janet Neebe Eureka, CA 2019-05-03

Virginia & Jim Waters Mckinleyville, US 2019-05-03

Franklin Suarez Orlando, US 2019-05-03

Kenzie Mullen Eureka, CA 2019-05-03

April Brinson Middletown, US 2019-05-03

Kay Schulz Trinidad, CA 2019-05-03

Taylor Myhre Fayetteville, US 2019-05-03

Charlene Stearns Eureka, CA 2019-05-03

Shlok Rajyaguru Sandiego, US 2019-05-03

Melissa Carrau Eureka, CA 2019-05-03

alexander ludwig Aliso Viejo, US 2019-05-03

Erin smith Charlotte, US 2019-05-03

rosemarie palmieri castaic, US 2019-05-03

Name Location Date

Dina Bocanegra. Las Vegas, US 2019-05-03

fgfgfyh gfgggfbdgd US 2019-05-03

C Lawrence Mckinleyville, CA 2019-05-03

Jordan Chaﬁn Hurlock, US 2019-05-03

Elizabeth Minnich Boise, US 2019-05-03

Stephen Ngila Massachusetts, US 2019-05-03

CARLY BENDER mead, US 2019-05-03

Brittany Lopez Gastonia, US 2019-05-03

Apiphaniey Moore Huntsville, US 2019-05-03

Kevin Valdespino Lake Worth, US 2019-05-03

YADAO INONG Hoopa, US 2019-05-03

Tom Mitchell Trinidad, CA 2019-05-03

William G Gonzalez Suffern, US 2019-05-03

Jordyn Greer Covington, US 2019-05-03

Gina Rimson McKinleyville, US 2019-05-03

Deborah Pelak Chico, US 2019-05-03

Brielle Albert Beverly Hills, US 2019-05-03

Robyn Simons SALEM, US 2019-05-03

linda norris Pasadena, US 2019-05-03

J carlos Maldonado Bronx, US 2019-05-04

andrea cain fall river, MA 2019-05-04

Rosemary Alicea Fayetteville, US 2019-05-04

Name Location Date

Sarah TARVIN North Brunswick, US 2019-05-04

andie cihasky Marina, US 2019-05-04

Destinee snyder Hudson, US 2019-05-04

Lucas Gray Pittsburgh, US 2019-05-04

Manny Reynoso Mesa, US 2019-05-04

Yasmin stocking-raban Brooklyn, US 2019-05-04

lola sam Lowell, US 2019-05-04

Danica Galatz Hibbing, US 2019-05-04

Brian Hunter Richmond, US 2019-05-04

Brendan Wilson US 2019-05-04

Maddie Hawk Manoa, US 2019-05-04

Jean Douglas olathe, US 2019-05-05

Cecilia Regan Omaha, US 2019-05-05

Sydney Smith Tacoma, WA 2019-05-05

Sandra Cuthbertson Eureka, US 2019-05-06

Julie Joynt Trinidad, CA 2019-05-06

Ellen Drury Trinidad, US 2019-05-06

Peter Aronson Arcata, CA 2019-05-07

Elaine Weinreb Arcata, US 2019-05-07

peter aronson Eureka, US 2019-05-07

Don Barry Arcata, US 2019-05-07

Tame Small-Zoller Monroe, US 2019-05-08

Name Location Date

Melanie Johnson Shingle Springs, US 2019-05-08

Jodie Ellis mckinleyville, US 2019-05-10

David Hankin Trinidad, US 2019-05-11

Charlie Hankin California, US 2019-05-11

Diane Case Allentown, US 2019-05-12

Karen Earl State College, US 2019-05-12

James Earl Los Angeles, US 2019-05-12

Rick Knoop Laguna Beach, CA 2019-05-12

john campbell Petaluma, CA 2019-05-13

Robert Lasser San Anselmo, CA 2019-05-13

Peter Manso Truro, MA 2019-05-13

John Zimmermann Long Beach, CA 2019-05-13

Michael Edick Pine Grove, US 2019-05-13

Dorae Hankin Trinidad, US 2019-05-14

Nicholas Hetrick Gaston, US 2019-05-14

Chen Bayba Arcata, CA 2019-05-15

Hugh Griggs Lawrence, US 2019-05-18

Grant Eberle Arcata, US 2019-05-18

Cao Layla Los Angeles, US 2019-05-19

Tiffany Shines Los Angeles, US 2019-05-19

mohsen keshavarzfard Fremont, US 2019-05-19

Destin Byrd Pawleys Island, US 2019-05-19

Name Location Date

Bryanna Nagy Fort Wayne, US 2019-05-19

Jaryne Joyner Orange Park, US 2019-05-19

Rusty Bartholomeo San Angelo, US 2019-05-19

Blake Boyster Fenton, US 2019-05-19

Byron Hughes Monroe, US 2019-05-19

Karen Dixon Eureka, US 2019-05-19

Lucas Garcia US 2019-05-19

Mary Campbell Arcata, CA 2019-05-19

Karin Rosman El Cerrito, CA 2019-05-19

Craig Edgar Blue Lake, US 2019-05-19

Toby Vanlandingham Klamath, CA 2019-05-19

Tasha Norton Hoopa, CA 2019-05-19

Cullen Lonergan Germantown, US 2019-05-19

Taylor Strickland Virginia Beach, US 2019-05-19

Chet Jarboe Eureka, CA 2019-05-19

Kristi Lewis Point Arena, CA 2019-05-19

Kathleen Lake Fair Oaks, US 2019-05-19

Andrew Mapalo Mckinleyville, US 2019-05-19

Samuel Farrelly Enﬁeld, US 2019-05-20

Katharine Stockley Sacramento, CA 2019-05-20

Taylor Pratt Oilton, US 2019-05-20

Hanna Greenwell Clarksville, US 2019-05-20

Name Location Date

Nicole Behnen Shrewsbury, US 2019-05-20

Matthew Weiss College Park, US 2019-05-20

Susan Dou La Puente, US 2019-05-20

Sarah Peterson Oakland, US 2019-05-20

Diane Anderson Arcata, CA 2019-05-20

Satoshi Nakamoto Los Angeles, US 2019-05-20

jen gavin Mckinleyville, US 2019-05-20

James Froland Bayside, US 2019-05-20

Jaskarn Bawa Chicago, US 2019-05-20

Joanne Berke Eureka, US 2019-05-20

Dana Landry Fort Bragg, CA 2019-05-20

Kimberly Starr Eureka, CA 2019-05-20

Mica Peacock Arcata, CA 2019-05-20

Howard Hibbs San Mateo, US 2019-05-20

Elijah Polston Fort Worth, US 2019-05-20

Gregg Moore Arcata, US 2019-05-20

Greg Wellish Trinidad, CA 2019-05-20

Carrie Mayﬁeld Trinidad, CA 2019-05-20

Elena Hernandez Carson, US 2019-05-20

Audi Hjerpe Eureka, US 2019-05-21

Jeffrey Dadigan Ventura, US 2019-05-21

Kayley Weber Eureka, US 2019-05-21

Name Location Date

Ixsel zamudio Orlando, US 2019-05-21

Jeff Wallace Sacramento, US 2019-05-21

allie baeza Los Angeles, US 2019-05-21

Mia deleon Houston, US 2019-05-21

Maureen Chase Eureka, US 2019-05-21