Grade 9 completed ≥ 5.5 credit = 1.0 Point
Grade 10 completed ≥ 11.0 credits = 1.0 Point
Grade 11 completed ≥ 16.5 credits = 1.0 Point
Computer Science
Course Credits Earned
Grade 12 Cycle 7
Enrollment
Credits earned ≥ 1 = 1.0 Point
Credits earned at any time during grades 9 - 12
Advanced
Placement/International
Baccalaureate or
Concurrent Credit
Courses (ACE
included)
Grade 12 Cycle 7
Enrollment
Credits earned ≥ 1 = 1.0 Point
Credits earned at any time during grades 9 - 12
To communicate the focus on student access, readiness, and success for this indicator,
and to ensure comparability across schools and grade spans the school quality and
student success indicator is calculated first at the student level.
Each student has a score that is the percentage of points earned out of points possible
to earn. These student-level scores are aggregated to the school level. This student-
level focus is necessary first because it aligns with the goals of the Vision and second
because schools will have different grade configurations and students in different
grades will have different points possible. The mean percentage of points earned per
student is used to calculate a school-level statistic which represents the average earned
points per student based on each student’s possible points. The following steps were
taken to model this student-focused school quality and student success indicator.
1. A student-level table was constructed that included two columns per indicator:
points possible and points earned. If an indicator listed in the table above applied
to the student the points possible were set equal to one. If the indicator did not
apply, the points possible were set to a null value to exclude them from the total
points possible for the student.
2. When a student’s data record indicated he/she earned a full or partial point the
point/partial point was added to the student row for that indicator. If a student’s
data record showed the student did not meet the criteria to earn a point for the
indicator, a zero was assigned for points earned for that particular indicator.
3. Students’ possible points were summed across all indicators (indicators with a null
value did not apply and thus were not included in possible points).
4. Students’ earned points were summed across all applicable indicators.
5. The percentage of points earned out of possible points was calculated for each
student.
6. School means were calculated for the percentage of points earned per student to
produce the school-level school quality and student success indicator.