1
School Quality and Student Success Indicators
Ark. Code Ann. § 6-15-2108(b) and (c) specify that the school performance system shall
consider without limitation at least one or more school quality and/or student success
indicators provided those indicators allow for meaningful differentiation of schools and
are valid, reliable, comparable and applicable statewide. Stakeholders communicated a
desire to have multiple measures included in this indicator as soon as possible.
The Arkansas Department of Education created a student-focused aggregation of
indicators that meet these requirements. The measures for this indicator focus on each
student meeting important educational milestones (such as reading proficiently),
important readiness criteria (minimum ACT score of 19 for Arkansas Academic
Challenge Scholarship), and important postsecondary success indicators (attainment of
AP, IB, concurrent credits). In essence, the school quality and student success indicator
combines measures of engagement, access, readiness, completion, and success
criteria. To calculate this indicator a student level table is constructed to include the
indicators listed in the table below
School Quality and Student Success Indicators
Indicator
Grade Level or Cohort
for Points Available
Points for Student
Student Engagement
Grades K -11
Point based on Chronic Absence (CA) risk level:
CA<5% = 1.0 Point
5< =CA < 10% = 0.5 Point
CA >=10% = 0.0 Point
Science Achievement
Grades 3 – 10
Ready or Exceeds = 1.0 Point
Close or Not Ready = 0.0 Point
Science Growth
Grades 4 – 10
Using ACT Aspire Science Value-Added Score
Percentile Rate
VAS PR 75 = 1.0 Point
25 VAS PR < 75 = 0.5 Point
VAS PR 25 = 0.0 Point
Reading at Grade Level
Grades 3 – 10
Ready or Exceeds = 1.0 Point
Close or Not Ready = 0.0 Point
ACT
Grade 12 Cycle 7
Enrollment
Best ACT Composite Score 19 = 1.0 Point
Use best ACT score from prior 3 years.
ACT Readiness
Benchmark
Grade 12 Cycle 7
Enrollment
ACT Reading 22 = 0.5 point
ACT Math 22 = 0.5 point
ACT Science 23 = 0.5 point
Use best ACT score from prior 3 years for each
subject.
GPA 2.8 or better on
4.0 scale
Grade 12 Cycle 7
Enrollment
High school final GPA 2.8 = 1.0 Point
Community Service
Learning Credits
Earned
Grade 12 Cycle 7
Enrollment
1 or more SL credits earned = 1.0 Point
Act 648 of 1993 course #496010 or other state
approved courses
Credits earned at any time during grades 9 - 12
2
On-time Credits
Grades 9 -11
Grade 9 completed 5.5 credit = 1.0 Point
Grade 10 completed 11.0 credits = 1.0 Point
Grade 11 completed 16.5 credits = 1.0 Point
Computer Science
Course Credits Earned
Grade 12 Cycle 7
Enrollment
Credits earned 1 = 1.0 Point
Credits earned at any time during grades 9 - 12
Advanced
Placement/International
Baccalaureate or
Concurrent Credit
Courses (ACE
included)
Grade 12 Cycle 7
Enrollment
Credits earned 1 = 1.0 Point
Credits earned at any time during grades 9 - 12
To communicate the focus on student access, readiness, and success for this indicator,
and to ensure comparability across schools and grade spans the school quality and
student success indicator is calculated first at the student level.
Each student has a score that is the percentage of points earned out of points possible
to earn. These student-level scores are aggregated to the school level. This student-
level focus is necessary first because it aligns with the goals of the Vision and second
because schools will have different grade configurations and students in different
grades will have different points possible. The mean percentage of points earned per
student is used to calculate a school-level statistic which represents the average earned
points per student based on each student’s possible points. The following steps were
taken to model this student-focused school quality and student success indicator.
1. A student-level table was constructed that included two columns per indicator:
points possible and points earned. If an indicator listed in the table above applied
to the student the points possible were set equal to one. If the indicator did not
apply, the points possible were set to a null value to exclude them from the total
points possible for the student.
2. When a student’s data record indicated he/she earned a full or partial point the
point/partial point was added to the student row for that indicator. If a student’s
data record showed the student did not meet the criteria to earn a point for the
indicator, a zero was assigned for points earned for that particular indicator.
3. Students’ possible points were summed across all indicators (indicators with a null
value did not apply and thus were not included in possible points).
4. Students’ earned points were summed across all applicable indicators.
5. The percentage of points earned out of possible points was calculated for each
student.
6. School means were calculated for the percentage of points earned per student to
produce the school-level school quality and student success indicator.