Section 2: The Path to Universal Access is Gender-Responsive
www.webfoundation.org
Developing a truly gender-responsive ICT policy starts
with the recognition that technology development
and use are both subject to existing socio-economic
biases and institutional discrimination. From this base,
policymakerscanbegintoidentifythespecicchallenges
and barriers that women and girls face in accessing and
using broadband, and can develop the appropriate policy
responses to reduce the gap.
2.2 Measuring the Global State of
Gender-Responsive ICT Policy
While policymakers increasingly appear to recognise the
critical nature of closing the digital gender gap for both
national and global development goals, our research
shows that countries are falling woefully short when
it comes to developing and implementing the gender-
responsive policies needed to do so.
A4AI conducted an expert survey of58low-and
middle-income countries across Latin America and the
Caribbean, Africa, and Asia between June and September
2016 to assess the existence and implementation of
policies and regulations that can lower broadband costs
and expand access.
1
This survey included a question to
assess the extent to which a country’s broadband policy
was gender-responsive:
To what extent has the government implemented
concrete policy goals for gender equity in internet
access and use?
Each country was scored on a range from 0 to 10,
with 10 indicating the existence of policy designed to
encourage increased access, training and use of the
internet for women and girls, with concrete, measurable
targets for ICT gender equity, and adequate funding
dedicated to achieving these targets.
2
Countries with
weaker scores were more likely to have limited integration
of policies and plans to increase access, with men and
boys having greater access, training and use of the
internet than women and girls.
On average, countries scored just 2.73 out of 10,
indicating very little to no discussion of the digital
gender gap and possible responses to address the
problem at the policy level.
3
1 The survey results are subject to an external peer review process, and an internal review by A4AI. See full methodology here.
2 See Annex for full scoring criteria.
3 This compares unfavourably to all other policy areas (e.g., spectrum management, competition policy, infrastructure sharing, universal access and service funds, etc)
assessedinthesurveyswherecountriesscoredonaverage5outof10,indicatingmoreconcertedlevelsofactivity.
The lack of attention paid to gender issues in ICT planning
andpolicyisnotspecictoanyoneregion—countries
across all regions are failing to take the steps needed
to address growing gaps in women’s access to and use
of the internet.
Acrossall58countriessurveyed,thehighestscore
awardedwasave(outof10)—andonlysixcountries
achieved this score. Each of these six countries has
recognised in some form the need to address the digital
gender gap at the policy level, or has developed national-
level programmes targeted at improving internet access
and use for women and girls, but none of them have any
measurable targets for improving women’s access and
use as part of a comprehensive strategy, or national ICT
or broadband policy.
Table 1- Summary of country scores from the A4AI country survey
of gender-responsive broadband policies (Source: A4AI, 2016)
Score Level & Qualications
(Score Range: 0-10)
Number of Countries
Policieswithgenderspecic
targets for training and access,
along with adequate budgetary
allocation(score>5)
0
Some sub-national or national
policies encouraging access and
trainingforwomen;noocial
targets exist. Some programmes/
projects being implemented at
thenationallevel(score5)
6
(Botswana, Costa Rica,
Dominican Republic,
Mexico, Nigeria, Turkey)
While policies do not include
targets or plans to improve
women’s access and training there
is evidence of some discussion
or action in government; several
programmes/projects in place,
mostly at sub-national level (score 4)
15
Policies do not include targets
or plans to improve women’s
access and training and there a
few examples of discussion or
action in government; very few
programmes/projects in place,
mostly at sub-national level (score 3)
15
Little to no incorporation of gender
equity concerns in plans or policies
with no evidence of awareness
or discussion of the issue in
government, no programmes/
projects in place (score < 3)
22
Total
58
7