Overview of Search Process for Custom Classification Positions
3
August 2020
• Search Committee discussions need to focus on the materials submitted (cover letter, resumes,
applications, references, etc), interviews, and comments from individuals that also met with the
finalists. Personal information on any applicant must be kept out of the search committee discussions.
• Campus visit provides similar opportunities for each finalist
• Interview procedures treat finalists consistently
□ Discuss Advertising Sources [if meeting happens when search is open for applications]
Staff contact should provide the Search Chair the list of ad sources used for the search. Will sources
already identified be effective in soliciting and recruiting a qualified and diverse pool of applicants?
Should additional sources be used?
Planning for Review of Applicants
□ Brief Overview of Review of Applicants
• The criteria to be used in evaluating applications has already been set in the job description.
• The first review of applications involves assessing which applicants meet the required
education and experience qualifications from the job description (not who best meets the
qualifications). The search committee will conduct this review and meet with IHR to discuss
who does meet the requirements. After this review the Master Referral list is created.
• The list of referred applicants will most likely be very large, so the search committee should
discuss if an initial interview should be done via email with a list of 4-5 common interview
questions sent to all referred applicants. This stage is called the email questionnaire. Begin
development of these questions early in the process. See section 9 below for detailed
information on this process.
• In the review of applicants from the Master Referral list AFTER email questionnaire responses
received, the search committee will use the required AND preferred qualifications, including
items listed in the ad as “Successful candidates will have the following”. Required education
does not need to be used at this point, as everyone on the master referral has been assessed
with that criteria; required experience can now be evaluated as to who best meets that
qualification. All applicants on the Master Referral are entitled to an interview.
• Discuss the Interview review criteria- Extent of each finalist’s experience with and their ability to
effectively perform each of the duties stated in the ad, in addition to the degree that they meet the
required and preferred criteria.
• Interview process (mode and questions) must be consistent throughout the process
• Obtain approval from LAS for each set of questions BEFORE they are used
□ Discuss letters of reference
• There must be a consistent plan concerning reference checks.
o Will the search committee be involved in reference checking OR the hiring official?
o Will references be requested for all semi-finalists; all finalists; or only the proposed hire?
• Whatever plan is selected, it must be consistent for all applicants at each stage of the process.
• Evaluation of references- strength of letters or information shared (if done via phone) as related to
applicant screening criteria
• Please note- Search Committee members cannot be references for any applicants.