Solomon Islands National General Election

Solomon Islands

National General

Election

3 April 2019

The Commonwealth is a voluntary association of 53 independent and equal

sovereign states. It is home to 2.4 billion citizens, of whom 60 per cent are

under the age of 30. The Commonwealth includes some of the world’s largest,

smallest, richest and poorest countries, spanning five regions. 31 of its

members are small states, many of them island nations. Commonwealth

countries are supported by an active network of more than 80

intergovernmental, civil society, cultural and professional organisations.

Visit www.thecommonwealth.org

iii

 
iv 
Table of Contents 
Acknowledgements ..................................................... vi 
Letter of Transmittal ................................................. vii 
Chapter 1 - Introduction ............................................... 1 
Chapter 2 - Political Background ..................................... 3 
National General Election Context ........................................... 3 
Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI) .................. 3 
Brief Historical Overview ...................................................... 4 
Key Issues ......................................................................... 5 
Rural Constituency Development Funds (RCDF) and Terminal 
Grants ....................................................................... 5 
Women in Parliament .................................................... 6 
Youth in Parliament ...................................................... 6 
Chapter 3 - Electoral Framework and Election Administration 8 
Electoral System................................................................. 8 
National Legal Framework and Regional and International 
Commitments .................................................................... 8 
Solomon Islands Electoral Commission (SIEC) ............................... 9 
Eligibility and Registration of Electors .................................... 10 
Political Parties Integrity Act (PPIA) and Political Parties Commission
 ................................................................................... 11 
Candidate Eligibility and Nomination ...................................... 12 
Election Offences and Petitions ............................................. 13 
Key Issues ....................................................................... 13 
Women’s participation ................................................. 13 
Register of Electors ..................................................... 14 
Recommendations ............................................................. 14 
Chapter 4 - Election Campaign and Media ........................ 16 
Media environment ........................................................... 16 
Election Coverage ............................................................. 17 
Social Media .................................................................... 18 

v 
 
 
Election Campaign ............................................................ 18 
Recommendations ............................................................. 19 
Chapter 5 - Voting, Counting and Results ......................... 20 
Background ..................................................................... 20 
Set Up Procedures ............................................................. 21 
Voting Procedures ............................................................. 21 
Counting Procedures .......................................................... 23 
Assessment of the Vote and the Count .................................... 24 
General Observations ................................................... 24 
Provincial-specific Observations ............................................ 26 
Honiara and West Guadalcanal ....................................... 26 
Honiara and North and East Guadalcanal ............................ 27 
Western Province – Marovo ............................................ 27 
Western Province - Gizo/Kolombangara ............................. 27 
Isabel – Kia ............................................................... 28 
Central Province – Tulagi .............................................. 28 
Malaita – Auki ............................................................ 28 
The Results ..................................................................... 29 
Recommendations ............................................................. 29 
Chapter 6 - Conclusions and Recommendations ................. 31 
Electoral Framework and Election Administration ................. 32 
Campaign and Media .................................................... 32 
Voting, Counting and Results .......................................... 33 
Annex A – Arrival Statement ........................................ 35 
Annex B – Interim Statement ........................................ 38 
Annex C – Biographies of Chair and Group Members ........... 43 
Annex D – Deployment Plan ......................................... 48 
 
   

Acknowledgements

We convey our sincere appreciation and gratitude to the people and the

Government of Solomon Islands, for the generous hospitality extended to us

since our arrival on 27 March 2019.

The support and advice provided to the Group by the Solomon Islands

Electoral Commission and all the stakeholders involved with the 2019 general

election informed the Group’s work and was greatly appreciated.

Our sincerest appreciation to the support and advice provided by the

Commonwealth Secretariat Staff Team: Mr Albert Mariner, Mr Jonathan

Cheng, Ms Sonali Campion and Mr Abubakar Abdullahi. Without their

commitment and professionalism, we would have struggled to complete our

task.

We convey our sincere gratitude to the Commonwealth Secretary-General,

Patricia Scotland, for giving us the opportunity and the privilege to serve the

Commonwealth through this mission, in support of democracy and

Commonwealth values in Solomon Islands.

vii

Letter of Transmittal

9 April 2019

Dear Secretary-General,

I have the pleasure to submit herewith our Group’s report following our

observations of the Solomon Islands National General Election held on 3 April

2019.

The Group was of the overall view that the election was credible and the

results reflected the wishes of the people.

The Group recognised the importance of this 2019 election following the

withdrawal of the Regional Assistance Mission to the Solomon Islands (RAMSI)

in 2017. We acknowledge the efforts of the Solomon Islands Electoral

Commission (SIEC) in conducting this election following the adoption of the of

the new Electoral Act in 2018.

The Group commended the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force (RSIPF),

supported by the military and police personnel from the Australian and New

Zealand Combined Task Force (CTF), which assisted the SIEC to implement

the logistics and security plan for the election.

The Group congratulated all the successful candidates in the 2019 election,

especially the two women who were elected.

Our report and recommendations are submitted with the hope that, if

implemented, Solomon Islands’ electoral processes will be strengthened. I

hope the SIEC and Solomon Islands’ development partners will give this report

due consideration and provide the necessary support to implement the

recommendations.

It was a privilege to lead this group of eminent Commonwealth citizens to

support the Solomon Islands’ democratic process.

viii

Chapter 1 - Introduction

At the invitation of the Solomon Islands Electoral Commission (SIEC), the

Commonwealth Secretary-General, Patricia Scotland, constituted an Observer

Group for the Solomon Islands National General Election that was held on 3

April 2019. The Group was led by Hon Sato Kilman Livtuvanu, former Prime

Minister of Vanuatu, and comprised eleven eminent persons from Africa, Asia,

the Caribbean and the Pacific. The Observer Group was supported by a four-

member staff team from the Commonwealth Secretariat. A full list of members

is at Annex C.

Terms of Reference:

“The Group is established by the Commonwealth Secretary-General at the

invitation of the Solomon Islands Electoral Commission (SIEC). The Group is to

consider the various factors impinging on the credibility of the electoral

process as a whole.

It will determine in its own judgement whether the elections have been

conducted according to the standards for democratic elections to which the

country has committed itself, with reference to national election-related

legislation and relevant regional, Commonwealth and other international

commitments.

The Group is to act impartially and independently. It has no executive role;

its function is not to supervise but to observe the process as a whole and to

form a judgement accordingly. It would also be free to propose to the

authorities concerned such action on institutional, procedural and other

matters as would assist the holding of such elections.

The Group is to submit its report to the Commonwealth Secretary-General,

who will forward it to the Government of Solomon Islands, the SIEC, political

parties taking part in the elections and thereafter to all Commonwealth

Governments.”

Activities

The Observer Group was present in Solomon Islands from 27 March 2019. During

three days of briefings, the Group met with the Solomon Islands Electoral

Commission (SIEC), political party representatives, civil society groups, media,

Commonwealth High Commissioners and other international organisations, and

domestic and international observer missions.

The Observer Group was deployed around the country on Monday 1 April. Two-

person teams visited five provinces and Honiara city. We had teams in Western

Province, Isabel, Central Province, Malaita, Guadalcanal and Honiara city. The

teams met with other domestic, regional and international observers in each

province, in order to build up a comprehensive picture of the conduct of the

process.

Over the course of deployment, Commonwealth Observers met with election

officials, security officials, regional representatives of political parties, media,

domestic and international observers and voters.

On the basis of the Group’s findings and observations, the Chairperson issued

an Interim Statement on 6 April 2019 (Annex B). The Group’s Report was

completed in Honiara and thereafter transmitted to the Commonwealth

Secretary-General.

Chapter 2 - Political Background

National General Election Context

The general election held on 3 April 2019 was the tenth since the country’s

independence in 1978. It was the first election held since the withdrawal of the

Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI) in 2017. RAMSI was a

Pacific Islands Forum Regional initiative, led by Australia. It was deployed to

Solomon Islands in 2003 and facilitated the end of the conflict (known as ‘the

tensions’), which affected the country from 1998 to 2003.

There were several key developments that shaped the political dynamic in the

lead up to the 2019 election, including the passage of the Electoral Act 2018,

and the second election held since the Political Parties Integrity Act (PPIA) in

May 2014.

Fifteen political parties registered under the PPIA prior to the election. Of the

333 candidates who contested the election, 170 were declared members of a

registered political party, and 163 contested as independents. There were 26

women candidates, the same number as in 2014. Nine female candidates

contested the elections as Independent candidates as compared to seventeen

who competed with political party affiliations.

Observers received many comments expressing voter concerns about alleged

corruption amongst the political establishment and business donors. A core

issue raised was the use of public money – particularly the Rural Constituency

Development Fund (RCDF) and the terminal grant of SBD$400,000 provided to

each MP before Parliament was dissolved at the end of 2018. These funds were

alleged to have been used to support their political campaigns.

Some of the stakeholders advised the Group that the root causes of the tensions

remain unresolved. These include disputes over land ownership, settlements in

Guadalcanal by people from the other provinces; unequal distribution of

development benefits stemming from natural resource and extractive

industries; increasing unemployment with limited opportunities, especially for

the indigenous community; and concentration of development projects in

Guadalcanal and Western Province. A report submitted by the Truth and

Reconciliation Commission in 2014, which made recommendations on these

matters, has yet to be discussed by Parliament.

Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI)

In April 2003, then Solomon Islands Prime Minister Sir Allan Kemakeza requested

Australian assistance to address the breakdown of law and order in the country

as a result of the tensions. Following consultations between the governments

of Solomon Islands, Australia and New Zealand, a package of strengthened

assistance to support the Solomon Islands Government - RAMSI - was proposed

and unanimously endorsed by a meeting of the Foreign Ministers of the Pacific

Islands Forum. RAMSI was debated and unanimously endorsed by the Solomon

Islands Parliament, welcomed by the President of the United Nations Security

Council, and supported by the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG).

RAMSI’s arrival in 2003, under the leadership of Australia, and supported by the

members of the Pacific Islands Forum, immediately restored law and order, and

ensured the machinery of Government could resume operations.

RAMSI was a long-term commitment to Solomon Islands, aimed at creating the

conditions necessary for a return to stability, peace and a growing economy. In

2009, RAMSI and the Government of Solomon Islands signed a joint Partnership

Framework, which set out shared objectives and timelines for RAMSI’s work.

On 1 July 2013 RAMSI’s military component was withdrawn, with development

assistance activities transferred to Australia’s bilateral aid programmes.

On 30 June 2017, RAMSI’s 14-year regional engagement came to an end. It was

reported that the total mission cost was around AUD$2.8 billion dollars and the

exercise was significant as it represented the first time 14 Forum Island

countries participated in a Pacific regional engagement by providing military,

police and senior advisors to the Mission in line with the provisions of the

Biketawa Declaration of 2000.

Brief Historical Overview

Solomon Islands politics has been characterised by fluid coalitions of political

parties and independent Members of Parliament. In December 2001, despite

the tensions, a general election was held. Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare

and the ruling People’s Progressive Party (PPP) were heavily defeated, retaining

only three seats, with only 19 Members of the previous Parliament retaining

their seats. The People’s Alliance Party (PAP), led by former Deputy Prime

Minister Sir Allan Kemakeza, won 20 seats, with the Solomon Islands Alliance

for Change (SIAC) securing 12 seats. Sir Allan was subsequently elected as Prime

Minister, with the support of the Association of Independent Members (AIM) led

by Mr Snyder Rini.

At the April 2006 election, 16 members of the previous government lost their

seats. Sir Allan Kemakeza retained his seat but his party was considerably

reduced in size. Snyder Rini’s AIM did well, with 13 newly-elected members.

Rini was subsequently elected Prime Minister by the new Parliament. Rioting

then broke out and a large area of Chinatown in Honiara was looted and

destroyed by fire by protesters who opposed Rini’s election. In the same month,

Rini stood down after losing the support of the majority of Members of

Parliament and, in May 2006, Parliament elected Mr Manasseh Sogavare (leader

of the Social Credit Party) as Prime Minister.

The Biketawa Declaration, agreed to by the Heads of the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF)

in October 2000, constituted a framework for coordinating responses to regional crises.

The Sogavare Government had a challenging relationship with RAMSI, and was

ousted following a vote of no confidence in December 2007, precipitated by the

defection of nine government Ministers. Derek Sikua, the leader of the recently

established Coalition for National Unity and Rural Advancement, and Education

Minister in the Sogavare administration, subsequently became Prime Minister.

Following the general election of 4 August 2010, the Solomon Islands

Democratic Party, led by Steven Abana, secured 13 of the 50 seats.

Eighteen seats were won collectively by members of other parties, with

independents taking the remaining seats. Mr Danny Philip, leader of the

Solomon Islands Reform and Democratic Party (a coalition of parties and several

independent Members) was chosen as Prime Minister, polling 26 votes. His rival,

Steven Abana, had the support of 23 Members.

In November 2011, following defections from the ruling coalition, Prime

Minister Philip resigned. In the parliamentary vote that followed, former

Finance Minister Mr Gordon Darcy Lilo was elected as Prime Minister.

The last general election, held on 19 November 2014, saw Manasseh Sogavare

being elected as Prime Minister by the new Parliament. Sogavare led a coalition

of parties under Democratic Coalition for Change (DCC).

On 15 November 2017, Rick Houenipwela was elected Prime Minister after

Sogavare lost a vote of no confidence on 6 November 2017. Prime Minister

Houenipwela led a Government comprising a coalition of parties under the

Solomon Islands Democratic Coalition for Change (SIDCC).

Key Issues

Rural Constituency Development Funds (RCDF) and Terminal Grants

Commonwealth Observer Groups from the 2006, 2010 and 2014 elections

highlighted the practice of sitting Members of Parliament being provided with

millions of Solomon Islands dollars under the RCDF. RCDF funds are intended

to support grassroots development initiatives. Widespread allegations persist

that these funds are used by Members to influence voters through direct cash

payments or gifts, thereby providing incumbent parliamentarians with an unfair

advantage. Auditing the RCDF remains a challenge. At present, it was

conveyed to the Group by various stakeholders that the annual RCDF allocation

is around SDB$6.2 million for each Member of Parliament. On dissolution of the

Parliament, Members received a Terminal Grant of SBD$400,000.

It was conveyed to the Group by stakeholders that the total value of all grants,

including the RCDF and the Terminal Grant, provided to each Member could be

up to SBD$13-18 million per year. While the Commonwealth is aware that these

funds are legally mandated, the Group expresses the concerns placed before us

and the need for them to be addressed. The Group was made aware of a

Commonwealth Parliamentary Association Handbook on use of CDF and best

practice which could provide guidance in this area.

Women in Parliament

Before this election, only four women had ever been elected to Parliament.

Section 48(1) of the PPIA encourages a political party to have at least 10%

women candidates out of the total number of candidates it endorses to contest

a general election. Four political parties satisfied this threshold of having 10%

female candidates. The Democratic Alliance Party and the People First Party

fielded the highest number of female candidates of five respectively.

The Act also has in place financial incentives, through a temporary special

measures grant, for any party with a female Member of Parliament.

Of the 333 candidates that contested the 2019 election, 26 were women

candidates – the same number as in 2014. As there were 447 candidates in the

2014 election, a proportionally higher percentage of women candidates

contested in 2019.

Two women were elected: Tanangada Lanelle Olandrea successfully retained

her seat in Gizo Kolombangara, and Soriacomua Freda Tuki returned to

Parliament in Temotu Province. Both are members of the Kadera Party.

Youth in Parliament

Of the 334 candidates who contested the 2019 Solomon Islands National General

Elections, only four were youth as their ages ranged from twenty six to twenty

eight. The Solomon Islands describes youth as being between fourteen to

twenty nine years and the Lower House Candidacy age is twenty one years.

Therefore persons between the ages of twenty one and twenty nine years are

considered youth and are allowed to vie for candidacy in the Solomon Islands

National Elections. There are institutions that aim to encourage young people

to get actively involved in the development of the country such as the Solomon

Islands National Youth Congress and the youth parliament. However, while

some youth show interest in that arena they seldom go a step further to enter

into national politics.

In the Political Parties Integrity Act 2014 there is no mention of incentives for

youth candidates. In Division 2 of Part 7 which speaks to Special Conditions,

there are no special benefits such as a temporary special measures grant under

the Act for political parties who have candidates that are twenty nine years and

under. There are no incentives provided to political parties for electing youth

Handbook on Constituency Development Funds: Principles and Tools for

Parliamentarians

into Parliament as a candidate of their party nor in the case where a member

of youth as an independent candidate subsequently joins a political party.

The only mention of youth in the Act is under the Minimum Provisions for the

Constitution and Rules of Political Parties which mentions the creation of other

divisions such as youth and women divisions.

Chapter 3 - Electoral Framework and Election Administration

Electoral System

The Solomon Islands Parliament consists of 50 members, directly elected from

single member constituencies on the basis of the first-past-the-post (FPTP)

system. The Parliamentary term is four years.

The Constitution requires that a review of constituency boundaries be

conducted by the Constituency Boundaries Commission at least every 10 years.

The most recent redrawing of constituency boundaries occurred in 1997

(increasing the number of constituencies from 47 to 50). In 2009 the Parliament

rejected a recommendation from the Commission to increase the number of

constituencies to 67. The largest constituency has 15,986 registered voters,

whilst the smallest is Malaita/Outer Islands at 3142 registered voters.

The Prime Minister is the leader of government and is elected by the Members

of Parliament from amongst their number. Lobbying for support occurs behind

closed doors over the course of several days in Honiara following declaration of

the results. If a coalition which commands the support of the majority of

Members is formed, then the Governor-General can appoint their nominee as

Prime Minister in accordance with the Political Parties Integrity Act 2014.

Otherwise, the Governor-General will call a meeting of Members, where he/she

then presides over a secret ballot for the position of Prime Minister in

accordance with Schedule 2 of the Constitution. In this case, voting takes place

through subsequent ballots, where the candidate with fewest votes is removed

from the previous ballot, until a candidate receives a majority of support in the

chamber.

Solomon Islands’ administrative structure consists of nine provinces, with the

capital city of Honiara administered as a separate district.

National Legal Framework and Regional and International Commitments

Solomon Islands’ Constitution guarantees fundamental rights and freedoms,

including freedom of expression, assembly and association, and participation in

elections.

The key documents providing the legal and regulatory framework for the

conduct of elections are:

• Constitution 1978;

• Constitution (Amendment) (Electoral Reform) Act 2018;

• Electoral Act 2018; and

• Political Parties Integrity Act 2014

In addition, Solomon Islands has signed or agreed to some significant regional

and international commitments and instruments relevant to the conduct of

elections. These include:

• International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial

Discrimination (ICERD);

• Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against

Women (CEDAW);

• Convention on Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPD);

• Pacific Leaders Gender Equality Declaration (PLGED); and

• Charter of the Commonwealth.

Solomon Islands Electoral Commission (SIEC)

Section 57 of the Constitution (Amendment) (Electoral Reform) Act 2018

provides for the establishment of the SIEC. The Electoral Act 2018 provides the

regulatory framework for the administration and conduct of elections. The

functions and mandate of the SIEC as outlined in the Act are to supervise the

registration of electors for the election of members of Parliament and the

conduct of elections of such members.

Electoral Reform was undertaken in relation to the structure of the SIEC to be

effective after the general elections. The SIEC will comprise a Chairperson, two

members (of which one of its members must be a woman) and the Chief

Electoral Officer (without voting rights).

The Chairperson must be an eminent person, such as a former Governor-

General, former speaker, a retired judge, former Member of Parliament, a

current or retired head of any religious organisation or of any civil society

organization. A Commissioner holds office for four years, coinciding with the

life of the Parliament. Commissioners work on a part time basis, receiving only

sitting fees.

The Electoral Act 2018 recognises the position of Chief Electoral Officer and

sets out his powers and functions. The position of CEO was not recognised in

any electoral laws in the past.

The office becomes self-accounting with the Chief Electoral Officer becoming

the accountable officer and the Commission having its own expenditure and

revenue head. Before the Act was passed, the Commission had to work through

the Permanent Secretary and the Ministry of Home Affairs budget head.

The position of the Chief Electoral Officer is recognised in the Constitution.

There are eight permanent staff members. The current Chief Electoral Officer

is Mose Saitala.

The new law provides for pre-polling. The SIEC conducted a pre-polling

initiative for police and electoral staff only, on 21 March 2019. A total of 16

pre-poll centres were opened; one in each of the nine Provincial capitals and

seven in Honiara. 1195 pre-poll votes were cast. On election day, these voters’

names appeared on the voters’ register but were marked as having pre-polled.

For the conduct of these elections, the SIEC recruited and trained

approximately 3500 polling officials. Most of these individuals were public

servants. The following structure was adopted for the conduct of these

elections:

• Ten Electoral Managers, one for each of the nine provinces, and one

for Honiara City, responsible for coordinating the process at the

provincial level;

• 50 Returning Officers, one for each constituency, responsible for

managing the elections at constituency level and declaring the

outcome;

• 1043 Presiding Officers, one for each polling station, responsible for

managing the polling stations on election day;

• Returning Officers and each Presiding Officer had two assistants

each, for additional support.

Returning Officers (irrespective of gender) were encouraged by SIEC to actively

recruit competent female Assistant Returning Officers. However, the manuals

do not make any recommendations for recruiting female Presiding Officers or

Polling Assistants.

Eligibility and Registration of Electors

In order to be eligible to vote, one must be an ‘ordinarily residing’ citizen of

the Solomon Islands, at least 18 years of age, and registered to vote. Persons

are disqualified from voting if they are declared to be of unsound mind or under

a sentence of imprisonment exceeding six months.

As quoted from Section 4 of the Electoral Act 2018:

(1) Under section 55(2)(b) of the constitution, a person is ordinarily resident

in a constituency if;

(a) the person has been continuously residing in the constituency for at

least 6 months; or

(b) the person is taken to have been residing in the constituency under

subsection (2)

(2) A person is taken to have been residing in a constituency even if the person

is not residing in the constituency if the person is entitled to be a member

of a group, tribe or line indigenous to the constituency.

The qualification of “ordinarily resident” provided in Section 4(2) of the

Electoral Act 2018 is the authority that permits voters to register where they

are not resident and seems broad enough to suggest they could register

wherever they like. It was reported to us that this has given rise to many voters

travelling some distance to register in constituencies other than where they

live and to which they had no connection. Furthermore, many stakeholders

alleged that it was common practice for candidates to offer cash favours to

electors if they enrolled in a constituency where it would be electorally

advantageous to said candidates.

Some international observers also confirmed to us that they were aware of this

practice. We observed people voting in constituencies to which they had no

connection, by their own admission, and were only doing so to because a

candidate had promised assistance to them.

It appears to us that there is a need to clarify, and tighten if necessary, the

definition of “ordinarily resident” in Section 4(2) of the Electoral Act 2018 and

to examine the extent to which financial incentives are being offered to voters

to register in a place to which they have virtually no connection.

For this election the national biometric voter registration system (BVR) of 2014

was used. The BVR was updated between September 2018 and January 2019.

Following the omission and objections process the final list of voters grew to

359,522, representing an increase of 71,955 from 2014. Overall, 48.6% of those

registered were women and 51.4% were men.

The SIEC advised that there were approximately 4,000 instances of multiple

registration during the 2018/19 registration exercise, with one individual

allegedly registering more than ten times. The SIEC has referred all instances

of multiple registration to the police for investigation. The SIEC expressed

concern that a lack of resources will make it difficult to prioritise all but the

most serious of these cases.

Political Parties Integrity Act (PPIA) and Political Parties Commission

In an effort to strengthen the political party system and culture in Solomon

Islands, the PPIA was passed by the Parliament on 27 May 2014. It commenced

on 30 June, following publication of the required Gazette notice. Regulations

under the Act were made by the Prime Minister on 6 August, and published in

the Gazette on 12 September 2014. The Act is administered by the new Political

Parties Commission, assisted by the Registrar of Political Parties.

The mandate of the Commission under the Act is to:

 register political parties;

 formulate, monitor and review policies relating to the regulation of

political parties; and

 issue integrity standards.

The Commission is comprised of a Chair and four other members, appointed by

the Governor-General on the joint recommendation of the Prime Minister and

the Leader of the Opposition. Members of the Commission can serve a

maximum of three terms of three years. The Group understands that the

Political Parties Commission did not have a Registrar for at least six months in

2018.

In addition, the Act makes provision for:

• the selection by a political party of its candidates for election,

including a requirement that at least 10% of the party’s candidates

should be women;

• coalition agreements between two or more political parties,

including the minimum requirements for these agreements;

• public funding of registered political parties, with an annual

administration grant to the party of $20,000 for each elected

member, and a further annual temporary special measures grant of

$10,000 for each female elected member;

• reporting by political parties of donations received;

• licensing of campaign activities by political parties not contesting a

particular election; and

• a prohibition on participation in elections by unregistered political

parties.

The PPIA does not address other challenges to political stability in Solomon

Islands, such as the tendency of coalitions to form and dissolve spontaneously,

or for Members of Parliament to cross the floor (known as ‘grasshopping’).

The PPIA also provides a potential pathway through which the formation of a

new government might occur. The Act obliges any parties forming a coalition

to formalise an agreement regarding the coalition, which must meet the

minimum requirements outlined in Schedule 2 to the Act. An important

component of this agreement is that it must include provisions prescribing who

the coalition may nominate as its candidate at the election of a new Prime

Minister.

Candidate Eligibility and Nomination

Under the Constitution, in order to be eligible to contest as a candidate for

election, a person must be a citizen of the Solomon Islands and be at least 21

years of age. A person is disqualified as a candidate if the person:

 is of unsound mind;

 is serving a sentence of imprisonment exceeding six months;

 is an undischarged bankrupt; or

 has allegiance to a foreign power or state.

Nomination Day was 6 February 2019. For the nomination process, the Electoral

Act stipulates that the prospective candidate’s nomination must be supported

by three electors ordinarily resident in the constituency for which the candidate

wishes to stand. A candidate may not stand for election in more than one

constituency. Additionally, on submission of the nomination papers, a

prospective candidate must pay a deposit of SBD$5000 (an increase from

SBD$2000 last election). A prospective candidate can be nominated by a

registered political party or stand as an independent.

For this election there were 333 candidates, 170 of whom were nominated by

a political party, with 163 independent candidates. The last day for the draw

of the order of the candidates’ names on the ballot paper was 27 February

2019.

Election Offences and Petitions

The Electoral Act outlines a series of election offences. These include: bribery;

treating; undue influence; personation; illegal voting; false statements; and

intimidation. Each offence is punishable by a fine and/or imprisonment.

Under the PPIA, it is an offence for a non-contesting party at an election to

campaign unless it holds an election activity license issued by the Registrar of

Political Parties. It is also an offence for a registered political party to fail to

report the source of its campaign funding within two weeks after the election.

Section 69 of the Act provides that each candidate must submit to the Returning

Officer a statement of account, specifying all expenses incurred by him/her

during the election campaign. This statement must be delivered within 90 days

of the declaration of the election result. A candidate that spends more than

SBD$500,000 in campaign expenses commits an offence. A candidate who

accepts campaign donations from a non-citizen or a company who has a non-

citizen shareholder commits an offence.

An elector or candidate may file an election petition with the High Court, to

complain of an undue return or undue election. An election petition is heard in

open court. The Court may summarily dismiss a petition if the Judge considers

that there are insufficient grounds for the petition. A petition must be

submitted within one month after the publication of the official results of the

election. A decision of the High Court on an election petition is final, and

cannot be challenged on appeal.

Key Issues

Women’s participation

There was no increase in the number of women candidates for the election as

26 women contested in 2014 and 2019 respectively. This is disappointing given

the efforts of women’s civil society organisations and their networks, as well

as training programmes by Solomon Islands’ development partners. Despite the

provision of reservations and incentives for women candidates in Section 48 and

49 of the Political Parties Integrity Act (2014), including a temporary special

measures grant, the number of women elected to the Parliament remain very

low. The Group noted that out of the six political parties that fielded female

candidates only four satisfied the 10% threshold: Solomon Island KADERE Party,

Democratic Alliance Party, Pan Melanesian Congress Party and the People First

Party. Democratic Alliance Party and the People First Party both fielded the

highest number of female candidates of five respectively. Yet, despite the

provisions of the PPIA, seven political parties did not field female candidates

for the elections. The reason given by these parties was that no woman came

forward to contest for the election on their platforms. The Political Parties

Commission acknowledged that these political parties have not breached the

Section 48 (2) of the Act which stipulates that: “Where the minimum number

of women who have applied or agreed to be nominated as candidates of a

political party is less than the number of women required by the political party

to satisfy subsection (1), such a political party will not have contravened this

section”. Nine female candidates contested the elections as Independent

candidates as compared to seventeen who competed with political party

affiliations.

Women candidates cited cultural attitudes towards women’s political

participation, safety and security, and financial barriers as some of the key

challenges.

The new Register of Electors with pictures for this election represents a

significant improvement.

However, concerns remain regarding the need for a mechanism to allow

subsequent registration of those unable to register during the registration

window (such as persons temporarily absent from Solomon Islands). Also, those

aged under 18 years during the registration window, but who would turn 18

before the election, were not captured. Given that three months elapsed

between the registration period and the election date, a significant cohort of

people eligible to register as at the date of the election were effectively

disenfranchised. SIEC will be looking at these provisions for future elections.

The Group was informed that voter identification cards were being ‘sold’ to

candidates as an indication of the elector’s support, in exchange for money or

some other benefit. The Group observed relatively few electors attending

polling stations without their card (although presentation of the card was not

mandatory). However, by virtue that all electors have their pictures on the

voters roll, this should not be an issue for identification.

Recommendations

The Group commends the actions of the Government of Solomon Islands to

address some of the recommendations from 2014, such as including provision

for pre-polling as well as updating the list of electoral offences. However,

several concerns remain. The Group recommends that:

 the Register of Electors be kept under review to maintain its integrity and

accuracy, and that continuous voter registration (CVR) be implemented;

 pre-polling provision be extended to other registered voters, such as those

involved in essential services or residing overseas;

 temporary special measures be adopted to increase women’s

representation in parliament, with one option being a quota of seats for

women and another being reviewing financial incentives for parties

fielding women candidates;

 provision of greater resource allocation and facilitation of best-practice

knowledge sharing for the Department of Women, SIEC and the Political

Parties Commission to engage with women’s civil society organisations and

their networks to identify the best way to achieve gender equality in

political representation, including through the application of temporary

special measures;

 consideration of the issuance of voter IDs only after the completion of the

objections and omissions period and the cleaning of the Register of Voters,

rather than on registration day;

 further consideration be given to a review of the constituency boundaries

with a view to standardising the numbers of electors across the

constituencies following the upcoming census; and

 that the definition of “ordinarily resident” in Section 4(2) of the Electoral

Act 2018 be reconsidered as the current definition is effectively taken to

mean that electors can register wherever they like, leaving the

registration system subject to abuse.

Chapter 4 - Election Campaign and Media

Media environment

The Constitution of the Solomon Islands guarantees fundamental rights and

freedom of the press and this is generally respected. Throughout the campaign

and election period, journalists were able to report freely. The radio and print

media played a positive role in raising awareness around electoral issues and

processes, and facilitating public debates.

Newspapers, magazines and broadcasters in the Solomon Islands are all

governed by an umbrella organisation, the Media Association of the Solomon

Islands (MASI), which promotes journalistic ethics, human rights and media

freedoms. The Solomon Island Electoral Commission (SIEC) which has a small

media unit, produced a Media Handbook to promote best practice in reporting

the election and worked regularly with MASI to conduct a series of trainings

with journalists.

According to the SIEC Media Unit, ahead of the 13 pre-election media trainings

were conducted in 2017 on Media and Democracy, Voter Registration, Election

Day, Parliament, Political Parties, Electoral Reform, Election Media Code of

Conduct, Social Media and Election. 11 of the trainings were held in Honiara,

1 in Gizo and 1 in Auki.

Training programmes involved 10 stringers of the SIBC, 20 journalists from mass

media organisations as well as 10 public relations/media personnel of the

Solomon Islands Government’s Communication Unit.

A training programme was also conducted with the SECSIP program in Auki for

provincial level journalists and new reporters in Malaita. This particular

training was mixed focus and included women candidates and CSOs groups

representatives. However, media group went through the Election Coverage

media code of conduct before signing the code and be given the accreditation.

International Media were briefed individually on the code of conduct, some of

them were sent the code to sign before they were given the accreditation.

The SIEC developed a Code of Conduct for national media organisations and the

media unit managed the accreditation of journalists for the election period.

According to the handbook: “The Solomon Islands Electoral Office (SIEO) has

developed a code of conduct/election media policy for all local and

international media representatives reporting the National General Election.

This code of conduct/policy is designed to balance the complementary role of

the Commission and its officers, with those of the media in a democratic

society. SIEO has been working closely with the media in past elections to

ensure accurate messages reach citizens. Media plays an important role in

information dissemination therefore it is important that the partnership

continues with the guidance of the Code of Conduct especially before, during

and after BVR processes and Election periods”

The Code of Conduct includes details of the planned media briefings,

accreditation process and the conduct expected by journalists and media

organisations, as well as serving as a commitment by the SIEC to:

“1.1.1. Hold regular briefings for journalists, updating them on SIEC’s

activities;

1.1.2. Respond to media inquiries in a timely and efficient matter;

1.1.3. Where possible, facilitate access to SIEC sites and officials; and

1.1.4. Provide the media with access to results as quickly as is

practicable under Solomon Islands law and established electoral

conventions”

All media organisations underwent training on the media code of conduct

before signing the code and provided with accreditation. International media

representatives were briefed individually on the code of conduct, some of them

were sent the code to sign before being given the accreditation.

It is unclear whether or how local media organisations adapted the Code of

Conduct for news content and programmes produced.

Without a media monitoring unit, (primarily due to the lack of dedicated

resources) the SIEC was not able to monitor compliance with the media code

during the campaign and election period. However, it is understood the SIEC

media unit would analyse news coverage filed by journalists in order to analyse

the impact on voters’ participation and reaction to the processes.

Women are still significantly underrepresented in the media but there is a

Women in Media and Communication Solomon Islands (WIMSI) network, which

held pre-election training to sensitise journalists on gender issues and reporting

during the election period. WIMSI also intends to publish a gender analysis of

election media coverage in due course. This will be a useful resource for

improving quantitative and qualitative coverage of diverse women’s

participation in Solomon Island’s political processes including parliamentary

elections.

Election Coverage

It is notable that access to a television and print media is limited in several

provinces. Stakeholders noted that radio is therefore the main source of

information for many communities, especially those in remote locations. The

state-owned broadcaster, Solomon Islands Broadcasting Corporation (SIBC),

emphasises its editorial independence from the government and provided

practical non-partisan information about voting as stipulated by SIEC alongside

news updates, advertisements paid for by candidates, and a series of leaders

debates.

The SIBC has an AM transmitter which enables nationwide coverage and has a

core group of provincial-level stringers.

However, the Group noted that during

the election period major national media outlets did not have the capacity to

comprehensively cover electoral issues outside Honiara and some of the

provincial capitals. The group also noted that accredited media were welcomed

by election officials in polling and collation centres where they were present.

Social Media

Internet penetration remains low in the Solomon Islands (less than 15%). Social

media are used in Honiara and some provincial capitals, but due to the limited

access to the internet they have less traction in other parts of the country.

Facebook is the most popular platform with up to 90,000 active users, while

the use of other platforms such as Twitter and Instagram is very limited. As a

result, few of the candidates cultivated social media as a campaign tool.

However, the SIEC and national media did use social media to provide voter

information and updates.

Election Campaign

In line with Electoral Act 2018, the campaign period was launched on time, on

5 February, when Election Day was announced, and concluded at midnight on 1

April 2019. During this time, political parties and independent candidates

engaged in robust and predominantly peaceful political campaign activities; in

Honiara the Group observed lively public rallies and party floats. In other parts

of the country boat parades were the popular mode of campaigning.

This is the first time in the political history of the Solomon Islands that a

campaign blackout was enforced in line with the new Electoral Act 2018.

Campaigning ended at midnight, 24 hours before polling day. Election eve,

known locally as ‘Devil’s Night’ in previous elections was a highly charged

atmosphere, with candidates and supporters engaging in widespread scare

tactics and vote-buying. In line with the Liquor Act (Section 82(i)) the Royal

Solomon Island Police Force (RSIPF) banned the sale and consumption of liquor

during the election week which was further extended for Honiara and

Guadalcanal until 8 April. Following the dynamics of the electioneering

campaigns, the RSIPF also banned float parades celebrating victory of

candidates in the national general election on the street of Honiara, in the

provinces or at sea.

A stringer is part-time or freelance journalist, videographer, or photographer

typically assigned by a news organization to cover areas that are considered less

newsworthy or that are deemed peripheral to the news organization’s coverage area.

A local newspaper may have stringers in surrounding small towns, whereas major news

organizations may have stringers in dozens of countries around the world, especially

in areas where they have no bureau or full-time reporters. Stringers also may be used

in areas that are seen as dangerous “trouble spots,” such as war zones or natural

disaster sites, or for stories that would be too time-consuming for regular staff to

cover. Source: https://www.britannica.com/topic/stringer-journalism

According to media reports, some political groups who were given approval to

organise floats at the close of the campaign period failed to adhere to

conditions that were attached to the approval of their request. RSIPF cited

exceeding the number of approved vehicles for the float parades, disregard for

passenger safety and traffic regulations which imposed great risk to both

participants and members of the public.

The Electoral Act (Section 125) defines the limit for election campaign expenses

for each candidate. However, the source of campaign funds was an area of

contention [refer to Ch.2 and 3].

Recommendations

The Group recommends that:

 efforts should be made to increase the capacity of the media to cover

elections in greater depth and the SIEC and MASI are encouraged to

continue to collaborate to develop age, location, gender and

disability inclusive approaches for information-communication

strategies throughout the electoral cycle;

 efforts should be made to strengthen the capacity of provincial news

stringers and promote greater partnership between mainstream

national media and community media correspondent/focal point

networks developed by groups such as Vois Blong Meri Solomons

(VBMS) and WIMSI to broaden the coverage of electoral issues from

provincial centres;

 national media organisations, in particular the SIBC, should be

encouraged to develop and promote their own in-house Codes of

Conduct for elections, drawing on SIEC guidance to ensure the voting

public is aware of editorial standards and ensure clear demarcation

between opinion (op-ed) content, daily news coverage and editorial

lines particularly during the campaigning period;

 consideration should be given to provide support to the SIEC to

establish a media monitoring unit to regularise the monitoring of

print, broadcast and online media to support compliance with the

Code of Conduct, as well as ensure accuracy in media content and

hear reactions and complaints; and

 encouragement of greater resources for the Political Party

Commission to undertake its key mandates including training

programmes for political parties and candidates on how to broaden

their campaign strategies to consistently focus on policy and

development priorities, and strengthening the capacity of political

parties to engage in inclusive dialogue and consensus building

processes.

Chapter 5 - Voting, Counting and Results

Background

The General Election proceeded as planned in all of the 50 constituencies.

Voting was scheduled from 7am to 5pm in 1,043 polling stations across the

country, an increase of 176 from the 2014 Election. More than 3,500 Election

Officers managed the poll and count.

As with previous elections, Solomon Islands used a first-past-the-post (FPTP)

system where the candidate polling the highest number of votes wins. Each

constituency returns a single Member of Parliament. Registration and voting are

not compulsory.

The passage of the Electoral Act 2018 strengthened the Solomon Islands

Electoral Commission (SIEC) and reflected some of the recommendations made

by former Commonwealth Observer Groups, including:

 improved training of polling officials be undertaken to ensure greater

consistency in the application of electoral procedures utilising,

amongst other measures, audio-visual training material;

 empowering the SIEC to respond appropriately in the event that a

force majeure situation arises;

 establishing procedures for pre-poll and out of constituency voting;

and

 allowing voters still in the queue at 5 pm to vote.

For the first time, pre-poll voting was introduced for Police and Electoral

Officials. This took place on 21 March. A total of 16 pre-poll centres were

opened – one in each of the Provincial capitals and seven in Honiara.

Election Officials are required to perform their duties in accordance with this

new Electoral Act, as well as a revised Presiding Officer Election Manual and a

revised Returning Officer Election Manual. The Group found that these

manuals covered substantial ground and also referenced some notable changes,

including a recommendation by the 2014 Commonwealth Observer Group that

the practice of recording the voter identification number on the ballot

counterfoil be removed, to ensure secrecy of the ballot.

Each polling station is managed by a Presiding Officer, with two Polling

Assistants. Training for Election Officials took place in 2 phases, with the ten

Election Managers and fifty Returning Officers being trained in late January and

the Presiding Officers and Polling Assistants being trained in the days prior to

Election Day.

Candidates are allowed to have one polling agent at each polling station, and

one counting agent at each counting centre, although they can nominate up to

two agent names for both processes. Written notice of such appointments

should be provided to the Returning Officer not later than ten days before

Election Day.

At each polling station, there should be one semi-translucent ballot box secured

with five or seven seals (the fifth or seventh being used to seal the flap at close

of voting).

Following the close of the poll, ballot boxes were transported back to a regional

designated secure facility for storage overnight. From the following morning,

ballot boxes were then transported to Provincial capitals, where the count took

place for different constituencies.

Set Up Procedures

Under the Electoral Act 2018 and the Officials’ manuals, the procedure for set

up is as follows prior to the opening of the polling station:

 The Presiding Officer and Polling Assistants should set up the room

with an eye towards ensuring: the secrecy of the ballot; the Presiding

Officer, Assistants, Agents and Observers all have full view of

activities; that the ballot box is clearly visible, and an orderly queue

is maintained outside and there is no congestion around the

entrance/exit;

 Affixing signs to the outside of the building and ensuring that the

following documents are all visible outside of the polling station:

Official List of Candidates, Symbols, and Colours; Polling Day

offenses sign; Instructions to Voters sign; and a Voter List for the

polling station; and

 Ensuring polling staff are correctly dressed, setting up the main

table, securing forms (including preparing Polling Agent

identification), and rechecking and accounting for all ballot papers.

Voting Procedures

Under the Electoral Act 2018 and the Officials’ manuals, the procedure for

voting is as follows:

 shortly before 7:00am, the Presiding Officer invites any Polling

Agents, Observers, and Voters present into the polling station to

inspect the empty ballot box;

 Presiding Officer to seal the ballot box on four sides or six sides

(depending on the size of the ballot box supplied), with seal numbers

recorded on the Record of Ballot Box Security Seals form (witnessed

by two polling agents);

 Presiding Officer to note the witnesses that observed the empty

ballot box and the sealing of the ballot box;

 Presiding Officer to ask all Agents, Observers and Voters to move

away from the ballot box and for Agents and Observers to take their

seats;

 at 7am the Presiding Officer announces that voting has begun;

 Electors approach the Presiding Officer one by one. The Presiding

Officer must be satisfied:

 as to the identity of the elector, by inspecting the elector’s

Voter Identification Card or, if the elector does not present a

card, by asking for the elector’s name and place of residence

and comparing the information provided against the

information contained in the Register of Electors;

 that the elector is eligible to vote at that polling station, by

checking the Register of Electors; and

 that the elector has not already voted, by inspecting the

smallest finger on the elector’s left hand for indelible ink.

 the Presiding Officer asks the elector “Are you X of Y Village and is

this your photograph on the register?”;

 the Presiding Officer marks the elector’s entry on the Register of

Electors by placing a tick in red ink in the box marked “has voted”;

 the smallest finger on the elector’s left hand (or right hand, if the

elector does not have a left hand) is placed into a bottle of indelible

ink, up to the first joint (if the elector has no hands, then the

Presiding Officer does not have to apply ink);

 the Presiding Officer stamps and marks the ballot paper, and issues

the ballot paper to the elector. (Unlike in 2014, there is no longer a

need to record the elector’s Voter Identification Number on the

counterfoil); and

 the elector proceeds to a voting screen, marks and folds their ballot

paper, and places it in the ballot box.

While one Polling Assistant assists the Presiding Officer with the process of

identifying electors and the issuance of ballot papers, the other Polling

Assistant is positioned close to the Ballot Box, and ensures all electors place

their ballot into the ballot box and directs electors to the exit. It is expected

that the two Polling Assistants will switch tasks every 3 hours.

At 4:55pm, the Presiding Officer warns those present and outside the polling

station that voting will end at 5pm and only those in the queue at 5pm will be

able to vote. At precisely 5pm, the Presiding Officer indicates who is the last

person in the queue for voting. After the polling station is closed, the Presiding

Officer:

 seals the flap of the ballot box with a security seal;

 completes the Ballot Papers Account form, and accounts for all

Ordinary Ballot Papers, Unused Ordinary Ballot Papers, Spoilt

Ordinary Ballot Papers, and Tendered Ballot Papers; and

 packages all materials ready for collection.

The Presiding Officer and Polling Assistants are responsible for the safe delivery

of the ballot box and other materials back to the Returning Officer. Transport

is organised in coordination with the RSIPF in a convoy arrangement.

An elector may require assistance under several circumstances, including if the

elector is blind, disabled, and/or cannot read or write. The Presiding Officer

(or a Polling Assistant authorised by the Presiding Officer), escorts the elector

to a voting screen, in the presence of a witness selected by the elector. The

elector indicates their preferred candidate, and the Presiding Officer marks the

ballot paper accordingly and folds and places the ballot paper in the ballot box.

Voting can be undertaken outside the polling station if an elector has access

issues to the station. The Presiding Officer is required to obtain ID information,

verify all details inside the polling station, and have the elector vote in a private

area away from close viewing. The Presiding Officer then returns with the ballot

paper and places it in the ballot box.

Counting Procedures

Counting of votes for each constituency is conducted under the supervision of

the Returning Officer for that constituency. The counting procedure is as

follows:

 once the ballot boxes have been received at the counting centre

from all polling stations in the constituency, verification of ballots

from each ballot box are conducted separately;

 mixing of ballot papers in batches from different polling stations and

pre-poll locations will then take place in accordance with a

numbered polling station system of mixing as advised by the SIEC just

prior to the counting;

 counting for a batch can commence;

 ballot boxes for a batch are emptied onto a flat surface, and are then

arranged in piles by the counting team under the names of each

candidate an elector has marked a ballot paper for;

 where count teams reject ballot papers, they should be separated in

three piles according to the rationale:

 (a) does not have an official mark;

 (b) ballot paper is informal; or

 (c) pre-poll ballot is for wrong constituency.

 once ballot papers are separated by candidate, count teams will

work in pairs to verify the pile for each candidate and organise the

ballots in sets of ten and bundled in sets of 100;

 the number of votes for each candidate, and the number of rejected

ballot papers, in that batch is recorded in the Ballot Paper Count

form;

 a fresh count of all ballot papers removed from the batch is

undertaken, and any error in the count is corrected, after which the

Returning Officer completes and signs the Ballot Paper Count form.

The form may be countersigned by an Assistant Returning Officer or

public officer present, and the details of the count copied by any

candidate or counting agent present;

 the Returning Officer copies the recorded number of ballot papers

from the “RO Count Verification” column in the Ballot Paper Count

form to the “Summary of Candidate Votes per Batch for

Constituency” table for the relevant batch; and

 once each batch count is completed, all counted and rejected ballot

papers are then placed into separate envelopes from the counting

kit, where the Returning Officer endorses the contents of each

envelope and an Assistant Returning Officer or public officer present

countersigns.

Once the Returning Officer has completed the counting and verification process

for all batches of polling stations, the Returning Officer must declare to be

elected the candidate for whom the greatest number of votes has been cast.

The Returning Officer then notifies the elected candidate and the SIEC in

writing.

Assessment of the Vote and the Count

General Observations

Training

 It was observed that the time provided for the Presiding Officer and

Polling Assistant training varied across constituencies, from between

one and a half to four days.

Pre-polling

 The Group observed that the registration period for pre-polling

closed before the final appointments were made for all the electoral

and police officers involved with the election. This meant some

officials made arrangements to enable their colleagues to vote on

the day, while others could not vote.

Polling Day

 Turnout: The Group observed long queues of voters early in the day,

including large numbers of young people. In some cases, voters had

arrived at polling stations before 7am. Observers did not observe any

lines at the close of poll.

 Atmosphere: The Group noted the peaceful and orderly manner of

voters, including those waiting in the queue. Voters queued up for

long periods in hot and/or wet conditions highlighting their

enthusiasm of the electoral process. The Group noted the alcohol

ban may have added to the peaceful nature of polling day.

 Accessibility: The locations of some polling stations were not

conducive to easy access for elderly and disabled people.

Nonetheless, the Group observed that polling officials were ready

when requested to provide assistance to those who needed it. The

support given would range quite widely and varied from assisting a

voter to the voting screen to physically marking a ballot paper for a

voter.

 Communication: The lack of mobile and internet coverage for certain

rural polling stations meant it was difficult for Presiding Officers to

communicate with the Returning Officer and SIEC.

 Visibility: Signage of voter information and voter lists were clearly

presented on walls outside and close to the polling stations. They

were placed in such a way to mitigate against congestion and allowed

for an easy flow of voters to the entrance of polling stations.

 Identifying Voters: Some voters struggled to find their names on the

voting list, and Presiding Officers would ask them to consider looking

for their name at nearby polling stations or for the voter to show

their ID card to check if the voter was in the correct polling

station/constituency.

 Screen Layout and Secrecy of the Ballot: Generally, polling stations

were laid out well to ensure secrecy of the ballot. Presiding Officials

and Polling Assistants were positioned in places which supported the

process and flow of voters. However, in some polling stations voting

screens were positioned in such a way which allowed Election

Officials, Polling Agents and/or Observers to see how voters were

voting.

 Sealing and Labelling of Ballot Boxes: The sealing and labelling of

ballot boxes was generally consistent. However, in some polling

stations the Group observed fewer seals were placed on the ballot

boxes than required. This may have been a product of intentional

design or a consequence of insufficient training. While most ballot

boxes were labelled at the opening of the polling station, in some

instances the ballot boxes were not labelled properly with

constituency information.

 Gender Balance: There were promising signs of an increase of female

representation across Electoral and Police officials. The Group

observed a good mix of men and women in the voting queues and did

not observe any overt discrimination of voters.

 Campaign Material: On the whole, the Group did not witness any

campaign material on Election Day or the day before.

 Conduct of Electoral Officials: In general, Polling stations opened and

closed on time. The Group noticed Presiding Officers and Polling

Assistants conducted themselves professionally. They often provided

helpful information to voters on the voting process, including on how

to mark and fold the ballot paper.

 Polling Agents: The Group observed that in some polling stations

there were too many Polling Agents, while in others not all parties

were represented by Agents. No Polling Agent displayed their

identification as required under the Officials’ manuals.

The Count

 The Group observed that procedures to ensure that effective and

accountable chain of custody records were kept for all transfers of

ballot boxes and other election material.

 The timeframe for commencement of the count of votes was

inconsistent across Provincial Capitals. In some cases, counts did not

commence until 3pm. Ballot boxes did not all arrive by the expected

time.

 Once the count commenced, the Group observed variations in count

procedures. Some Returning Officers were meticulous in their

transparency but did not engage all count staff in the process, while

other Returning Officers were more organised and efficient. This

meant efficiency was compromised in some instances resulting in

much longer counting periods. The Group notes that this was the first

general election requiring batching of polling stations for the count and

this may have contributed to inefficiencies and delays.

 The electoral officials are to be commended for abiding by the electoral

process and ensuring transparency and delivering on the guarantee

that votes remain secret through the new count procedures.

Provincial-specific Observations

Commonwealth Observer teams were deployed to seven locations across

Solomon Islands. The provinces visited account for 39 of the nation’s 50

constituencies. Teams observed the voting. Some teams observed the counting

and tabulation process.

Key provincial-specific Observations, which are not covered in the General

Observations before, are noted below:

Honiara and West Guadalcanal

 The Team observed that police visibility at all polling stations

ensured calm and order. Roving police teams were observed in West

Guadalcanal;

 Polling Assistants were prepared to assist the elderly and women

with children;

 The poll opened and closed on time. Ballot boxes were sealed, and

the seal numbers verified with polling agents. Some ballot boxes

were labelled with the name of the polling station before the

opening. Some were labelled at the close of poll;

 The start of the count was delayed but methodical and transparent.

High presence of agents for all candidates were present at all polling

stations and at the count centres; and

 There were some instances of tendered ballots.

Tendered ballots are differentiated ballot papers given to a voter whose name has

already been used by a different voter.

Honiara and North and East Guadalcanal

 Police/Security were present but not intrusive, and included female

officers;

 Observers not visible in area, except in Honiara;

 The layout could be improved in certain circumstances - two booths

would be more suitable as sometimes if the voter takes time to cast

his vote then the next voter in the queue has to wait; and

 In one case, a voter’s name was not on the register and he was turned

away.

Western Province – Marovo

 The distribution of election materials from the constituency

distribution centre to polling stations was done professionally and

with the full support of all electoral and security officials during

daylight;

 The Team observed use of private resources (ships) by a candidate

on Election Day, and following Election Day, for the purpose of

transporting voters to and from the constituency from other parts of

the Solomon Islands. These boats could transport over 500

passengers;

 The Team found that in a couple of polling stations the number of

ballots in the ballot box by early morning appeared to be unusually

high as compared to other polling stations visited during the same

period;

 In four polling stations, seals were not applied properly to the ballot

box. This oversight appeared to occur in a concentrated area of the

constituency; and

 Some Election Officials were not using checklists during the

distribution of election materials, which led to a relatively

inefficient and ad-hoc process.

Western Province - Gizo/Kolombangara

 The Team observed that in some cases polling stations that were co-

located did not see an even flow of voters. In some cases, one had

long queues while the other was very quiet;

 The Team spoke to a young lady who along with several voters came

to vote at a constituency she had never been to before. She admitted

that her reason for doing so is because the incumbent MP for her

constituency did not provide her with any assistance.

 There seemed to be inconsistency in how the indelible ink was

applied to voters. In some cases, electoral officials were applying

the ink with a cotton bud along the finger nails rather than dipping

the finger in the ink bottle; and

 In some cases, the seals on the ballot boxes were not applied

consistently and according to their manuals. Some were quite loose

while in other cases not all seals had been applied. In one case, one

side of the ballot box had no seal at all.

Isabel – Kia

 There seemed to be some confusion regarding logistics and

transportation of ballot boxes and materials, following close of poll.

The Team observed that in some constituencies, ballot boxes were

transported to a secure storage location at night without security

and polling agents escorting the ballot boxes;

 Low police presence was noted in comparison to other

constituencies.

Central Province – Tulagi

 The Team observed general voter enthusiasm. For example, voters

in relatively bigger polling stations came from several smaller

villages of up to five kilometres away to cast their vote and were at

polling stations by or before 7am;

 It was noted that even in polling stations identified as flashpoints

during the last observation, voting was generally calm. In one

particular polling station, voting was more orderly because

community volunteers organised voting in batches;

 Some 27 per cent of the electoral officials at the polling units

observed were female. According to a local election official, female

polling officers could have been higher but for the fact that some

men don’t allow their wives to serve as polling officer. Equal

opportunities were provided for women to cast their votes. Polling

units observed appeared to be safe for women to cast their votes

free of any forms of intimidation, coercion, violence or patriarchal

voting tendencies; and

 Media was only visible at the provincial Polling Unit (Assembly Office)

and collation centre.

Malaita – Auki

 Illiterate voters sought assistance in all polling stations visited. The

Team witnessed voting by young, elderly and partially disabled

persons. Reconciliation of ballot papers by counting officials was

careful, transparent and accurate;

 There were tendered ballots in five of the polling stations visited;

and

 Overall, the Team was satisfied with the procedures applied in

opening of the first station, witnessed consistent sealing of ballot

boxes and the orderly voting by electors in 15 polling stations.

Counting observed in the three counting centres was undertaken with

greater care and accuracy displayed by the officials.

The Results

Results as announced by the Solomon Islands Electoral Commission on 6 and 7

April indicated a seat distribution in the incoming Parliament as follows:

Kadare Party 8 seats

Solomon Islands Democratic Party 8 seats

United Democratic Party 4 seats

Democratic Alliance Party 3 seats

People’s Alliance Party 2 seats

Solomon Islands United Party 2 seats

People First Party 1 seat

Solomon Islands Party for Rural Advancement 1 seat

Independents 21 seats

Recommendations

The Group recommends:

 greater attention be paid to the selection of polling station facilities,

to ensure ease of access for disabled, elderly, frail and pregnant

electors;

 consideration of the use of satellite phones for polling stations

outside of mobile and internet coverage, to facilitate communication

with Returning Officers, SIEC and RSIPF;

 the training of Election Officials should be standardised to ensure

consistency;

 that the training of Election Officials places greater emphasis on

polling station layout, particularly the placing of voting screens to

ensure secrecy;

 there be a review of how polling officials be given relief throughout

polling day;

 consideration be given to review the new count procedures to

increase consistency and efficiency of the system, without

compromising transparency;

 there be continuation of support for civil society organisations to

increase their capacity to observe future elections, and to observe

throughout the electoral cycle;

 earlier appointment of Returning Officers, Presiding Officers and

Polling Assistants, to ensure timely training and the ability of

election officials to pre-poll;

 continue to ensure that a broad program of civic awareness and voter

education is implemented, in order to strengthen voter confidence

in the electoral process;

 polling agents must have proper accreditation and visible IDs

displayed at polling stations;

 that the practice of a Presiding Officer calling out the name of the

elector once identified be introduced, for the purpose of

transparency and to allow Polling Agents to follow who has voted;

and

 consider highlighting the voluntary requirement of voter registration

cards as part of voter awareness material, and how this improves

efficiency of the process.

Chapter 6 - Conclusions and Recommendations

The Group commended the people of Solomon Islands for the enthusiasm and

commitment in how they engaged in their national electoral process. The

election was inclusive and competitive. A high turnout at campaign activities

was observed in Honiara and other provinces. Voters were generally free to

express their will. The elderly, women and young people were free to

participate in the voting process, and received assistance from the polling

officials when required.

The SIEC’s role to strengthen the country’s national election and the

administration of the election under the new Electoral Act 2018 is to be

commended. The role played by the SIEC officials, Election Managers, Returning

and Presiding Officers in the management of election day and the count

activities represents significant progress and indicates a commitment to

strengthening the country’s democratic practices.

The arrangements for pre-polling for all officials involved with the election is

commended. Consideration should be given to allow other voters who are

involved with essential services, such as health and education, to participate

in pre-polling.

The Group commends the adoption of out-of-constituency voter registration for

the 2019 election. Civic awareness and voter education are critical to ensuring

an informed electorate, which is able to engage constructively in the nation’s

political and electoral processes. The SIEC could work closely with civil society

organisations in this regard.

However, the Group notes that political representation of women remains low.

Measures adopted thus far to increase representation of women in Parliament

needs to be supported by all the political parties and relevant institutions.

The Group commends the role of RSIPF in supporting SIEC and ensuring the

process was conducted in a peaceful environment. The support provided by

Australia and New Zealand through the deployment of the Combined Task Group

(CTG) contributed to delivering the required logistical arrangements for the

election.

In the context of our Terms of Reference, this Report provides a number of

recommendations for consideration to further strengthen the electoral process

in Solomon Islands. Our overall conclusion is that the 2019 National General

Election was conducted in a peaceful, transparent and inclusive manner. We

congratulate SIEC, RSIPF and the people of Solomon Islands for participating

and ensuring the success of the 2019 election.

In this Report, the Group has set out various recommendations and we outline

them below for ease of reference.

Electoral Framework and Election Administration

The Group recommends that:

 the Register of Electors be kept under review to maintain its integrity

and accuracy, and that continuous voter registration (CVR) be

implemented;

 pre-polling provision be extended to other registered voters, such as

those involved in essential services or residing overseas;

 temporary special measures be adopted to increase women’s

representation in parliament, with one option being a quota of seats

for women and another being reviewing financial incentives for

parties fielding women candidates;

 provision of greater resource allocation and facilitation of best-

practice knowledge sharing for the Department of Women, SIEC and

the Political Parties Commission to engage with women’s civil society

organisations and their networks to identify the best way to achieve

gender equality in political representation, including through the

application of temporary special measures;

 consideration of the issuance of voter IDs only after the completion

of the objections and omissions period and the cleaning of the

 further consideration be given to a review of the constituency

boundaries with a view to standardising the numbers of electors

across the constituencies following the upcoming census; and

 that the definition of “ordinarily resident” in Section 4(2) of the

Electoral Act 2018 be reconsidered as the current definition is

effectively taken to mean that electors can register wherever they

like, leaving the registration system subject to abuse.

Campaign and Media

The Group recommends that:

 efforts should be made to increase the capacity of the media to cover

elections in greater depth and the SIEC and MASI are encouraged to

continue to collaborate to develop age, location, gender and

disability inclusive approaches for information-communication

strategies throughout the electoral cycle;

 efforts should be made to strengthen the capacity of provincial news

stringers and promote greater partnership between mainstream

national media and community media correspondent/focal point

networks developed by groups such as Vois Blong Meri Solomons

(VBMS) and WIMSI to broaden the coverage of electoral issues from

provincial centres;

 national media organisations, in particular the SIBC, should be

encouraged to develop and promote their own in-house Codes of

Conduct for elections, drawing on SIEC guidance to ensure the voting

public is aware of editorial standards and ensure clear demarcation

between opinion (op-ed) content, daily news coverage and editorial

lines particularly during the campaigning period;

 consideration should be given to provide support to the SIEC to

establish a media monitoring unit to regularise the monitoring of

print, broadcast and online media to support compliance with the

Code of Conduct, as well as ensure accuracy in media content and

hear reactions and complaints; and

 encouragement of greater resources for the Political Party

Commission to undertake its key mandates including training

programmes for political parties and candidates on how to broaden

their campaign strategies to consistently focus on policy and

development priorities, and strengthening the capacity of political

parties to engage in inclusive dialogue and consensus building

processes.

Voting, Counting and Results

The Group recommends:

 greater attention be paid to the selection of polling station facilities,

to ensure ease of access for disabled, elderly, frail and pregnant

electors;

 consideration of the use of satellite phones for polling stations

outside of mobile and internet coverage, to facilitate communication

with Returning Officers, SIEC and RSIPF;

 the training of Election Officials should be standardised to ensure

consistency;

 that the training of Election Officials places greater emphasis on

polling station layout, particularly the placing of voting screens to

ensure secrecy;

 there be a review of how polling officials be given relief throughout

polling day;

 consideration be given to review the new count procedures to

increase consistency and efficiency of the system, without

compromising transparency;

 there be continuation of support for civil society organisations to

increase their capacity to observe future elections, and to observe

throughout the electoral cycle;

 earlier appointment of Returning Officers, Presiding Officers and

Polling Assistants, to ensure timely training and the ability of

election officials to pre-poll;

 continue to ensure that a broad program of civic awareness and voter

education is implemented, in order to strengthen voter confidence

in the electoral process;

 polling agents must have proper accreditation and visible IDs

displayed at polling stations;

 that the practice of a Presiding Officer calling out the name of the

elector once identified be introduced, for the purpose of

transparency and to allow Polling Agents to follow who has voted;

and

 consider highlighting the voluntary requirement of voter registration

cards as part of voter awareness material, and how this improves

efficiency of the process.

Annex A – Arrival Statement

ARRIVAL STATEMENT BY HON SATO KILMAN LIVTUVANU

CHAIR OF THE COMMONWEALTH OBSERVER GROUP

SOLOMON ISLANDS NATIONAL GENERAL ELECTION 2019

We are privileged to be here in Solomon Islands to observe the National General

Election to be held on 3 April 2019. The Commonwealth has been an active

partner in supporting the country’s democratic processes and has deployed

observer groups to Solomon Islands since 2001.

I am honoured to have been invited by the Commonwealth Secretary-General,

Patricia Scotland, to lead a Group of eminent Commonwealth citizens to

support Solomon Islands national democratic process.

Our Group members are from Africa, Asia, the Caribbean and the Pacific. We

are supported by a staff team from the Commonwealth Secretariat.

The Commonwealth attaches great importance to the conduct of credible and

peaceful elections as a means of giving citizens an opportunity to choose their

leaders and to hold them accountable. The Commonwealth Charter is very

clear on the “inalienable right of individuals to participate in democratic

processes, in particular through free and fair elections in shaping the society in

which they live. Governments, political parties, and civil society are

responsible for upholding and promoting democratic culture and practices and

are accountable to the public in this regard.”

Our Group will observe and report on relevant aspects of the organisation and

conduct of this election, including the environment in which it is held. We will

consider the key factors that could impact on the credibility of the electoral

process as a whole, and assess whether this election have been conducted

according to the standards for democratic elections to which Solomon Islands

has committed itself and as outlined in the country’s Constitution and the

Electoral Act 2018. We will be objective and impartial. We have met with

some of the political parties and other stakeholders. The Group received a

briefing from the Solomon Islands Electoral Commission (SIEC) on the various

aspects of the new Electoral Act 2018 under which this election will be

conducted. We are pleased to note that some of the recommendations

submitted by previous Commonwealth Observer Groups were accepted and

implemented as part of the country’s electoral reforms.

We plan to deploy teams to several provinces including here in Honiara City, to

observe the vote, the count and the results tabulation process. We will

coordinate with other international observers and we welcome the

participation of domestic observers who have been deployed throughout the

country. Our Group will return to Honiara to write and finalise our report

before we depart the country.

This election is critical for sustaining the peace dividend the people of Solomon

Islands have worked hard to secure. We commend the role that the Pacific

Forum region played through RAMSI in supporting the country’s efforts to pursue

its peace and development objectives. We urge all the candidates and voters

to participate peacefully in the country’s election and be assured of the

Commonwealth’s commitment to strengthening your national democratic

processes and institutions.

Tank yu tumas.

Honiara

29 March 2019

The Commonwealth Observer Group is composed of:

Hon Sato Kilman Livtuvanu, Chairperson – Former Prime Minister of Vanuatu

Ms Sharon Bhagwan-Rolls - Board Chair, Global Partnership for the Prevention

of Armed Conflict (GPPAC) and Co-Chair, Board of Directors, Global Fund for

Women (Fiji)

Mr Pesi Fonua – Editor and Publisher, Matangi Tonga Online (Tonga)

Mr Hendrick Gappy – Former Chairman, Seychelles Electoral Commission

(Seychelles)

Ms Kimberly Gilbert – Board Member for Training and Development of the

Caribbean Regional Youth Council (Trinidad and Tobago)

Mr Ahmed Issack Hassan – Former Chairperson, IEBC Kenya

Ms Beverly Joeman – Vice Chair, Sabah, Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections

(Bersih 2.0), (Malaysia)

Mr Reuben Kaiulo - Former Election Commissioner (Papua New Guinea)

Dr Rajen Prasad – Former Member of Parliament and former Commonwealth

Envoy to Lesotho (New Zealand)

Senator Lisa Singh – Senator for Tasmania (Australia)

Mr Wilson Toa – CEO, Transparency International (Vanuatu)

The Group is supported by a Commonwealth Secretariat staff team comprised

of:

Mr Albert Mariner – Head, Asia/Europe/Caribbean/Pacific Section, Governance

and Peace Directorate, (Staff Team Leader)

Mr Jonathan Cheng – Political Officer, Asia/Europe/Caribbean/Pacific Section,

Governance and Peace Directorate

Ms Sonali Campion – Programme Officer, Commonwealth Electoral Network,

Governance and Peace Directorate

Mr Abubakar Abdullahi – Programme Officer, Good Offices Section, Governance

and Peace Directorate

For more information, or to organise media interviews, please contact Sonali

Campion

Email: [email protected] Tel: +677 7249473

Note to Editors

The Commonwealth is a voluntary association of 53 independent and equal

sovereign states. It is home to 2.4 billion citizens, of whom 60 per cent are

under the age of 30. The Commonwealth includes some of the world’s largest,

smallest, richest and poorest countries, spanning five regions. 31 of its

members are small states, many of them island nations. Commonwealth

countries are supported by an active network of more than 80

intergovernmental, civil society, cultural and professional organisations.

Visit www.thecommonwealth.org

Annex B – Interim Statement

INTERIM STATEMENT BY HON SATO KILMAN LIVTUVANU

CHAIR OF THE COMMONWEALTH OBSERVER GROUP

SOLOMON ISLANDS NATIONAL GENERAL ELECTION 2019

We commend the commitment of the people of the Solomon Islands for

participating peacefully and in high numbers in their national general

election, held on Wednesday 3 April 2019. We acknowledge the efforts of

the Solomon Islands Electoral Commission (SIEC) in conducting the election

following the adoption of the Electoral Act in September 2018. We

observed some positive aspects of the process and recognised areas that

could be considered to further enhance the country’s democratic process.

The Group is of the view that the results of the 2019 national general

election should reflect the wishes of the people of the Solomon Islands. We

issue this statement as the count process is ongoing, with the official

results yet to be declared.

Following an invitation from the SIEC, the Commonwealth Secretary-General

deployed this Group to undertake this observation mission on behalf of the

Commonwealth family. Our terms of reference are to assess whether the

election was held according to the standards of democratic elections to which

the Solomon Islands has committed, with reference to the country’s own legal

framework, as well as various international commitments to which the Solomon

Islands is a signatory.

Prior to the deployment of our teams to different constituencies, we held

meetings in Honiara with SIEC, some of the political parties, representatives of

the media, civil society groups, representatives of women and youth

organisations, other international observer groups and some of the

Commonwealth High Commissioners. We also attended a security briefing from

the Police Commissioner and received logistic support plans from the

Commander of the Australian and New Zealand Combined Task Group (CTG).

We had teams deployed to Western Province, Isabel Province, Central Province,

Malaita, Guadalcanal and Honiara City. On Election Day our teams observed the

opening of polls, voting and the closing of polls.

The aim of this Interim Statement is to provide our initial assessment of the

electoral process, based on representations made to us and our direct

observations.

Legal framework and the election management body

This election was administered in accordance with the provisions of the

Constitution 1978, the Political Parties Integrity Act 2014, and the Electoral Act

2018.

We welcomed the SIEC’s decision to introduce pre-polling for the first time to

allow polling officials and police officers involved with the elections to cast

their vote. However, the Group noted that the registration period for pre-

polling closed before the final appointments were made for all the electoral

and police officers involved with the election.

The Group noted the new out-of-constituency registration arrangements.

However, the lack of clarity around the definition of ‘ordinarily resident’ and

where citizens can register and vote appeared to raise concerns. We also

received several complaints about the absence of out-of-constituency voting

arrangements that would have enabled workers involved with essential

services, and others who reside and work in provincial capitals, including

Honiara, to cast their vote without having to travel to their respective

provinces.

Logistics and Security

Our Group commends the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force (RSIPF) for the

security and logistics plans put in place to ensure a peaceful environment for

the national general election. We appreciate the logistics support to the SIEC

and RSIPF provided by the Governments of Australia and New Zealand through

the presence of the CTG.

The Campaign and Media Environment

Our Group observed some of the campaign activities in Honiara before teams

were deployed to different provinces on 1 April 2019. We observed an

energised campaign environment with large public rallies and lively party

floats. The Group was not made aware of any restrictions on the freedoms

vital to a campaign period, notably that of assembly and expression.

The Group commends the pre-election media training undertaken by SIEC and

welcomes the positive role that the radio and print media played in raising

awareness around electoral issues and processes, and in facilitating public

debate. We encourage the SIEC and Media Association of Solomon Islands (MASI)

to continue to collaborate to develop age, location, gender and disability

inclusive approaches for ongoing information communication strategies

throughout the electoral cycle.

Polling Day

Prior to polling day, teams met with Returning Officers in their respective

constituencies and observed the distribution of election materials.

On polling day, voters turned out in large numbers. On the whole, the polling

stations we observed opened on time around 7am. In many areas we observed

high numbers of voters had already lined up before the opening of the poll.

Teams met with some of the candidate agents, domestic and other

international observers, who were generally positive about the polling process.

The polling officials we observed carried out their responsibilities in a

professional and non-partisan manner. We acknowledged the presence of the

candidate agents, whose role it was to ensure transparency was maintained in

the polling stations.

However, we observed several voters who struggled to find their names on the

voter list. A few seemed uncertain about their designated polling station and

in some cases voting screens needed to be more carefully positioned to ensure

the secrecy of the ballot. There were inconsistencies in the way ballot boxes

were sealed and labelled, and some teams noted tendered ballot papers had to

be issued to a few voters whose vote was allegedly cast by someone else.

While some polling stations were not fully accessible, we observed that polling

officials were ready to assist elderly and disabled voters.

Security presence at polling stations was adequate and contributed to the

relatively peaceful and orderly environment in which the poll was conducted.

We commend the election officials, as well as RSIPF and Correctional Officers,

for conducting their tasks in a professional manner.

The Count

The Group observed counts in several provinces and notes SIEC’s efforts to

ensure transparency, while still delivering on the guarantee that votes remain

secret through new count procedures. However, consideration should be given

to review the current procedures to increase efficiency.

Rural Constituency Development Fund (RCDF)

The Group noted that the Electoral Act (Section 125) defines the limit for

election campaign expenses for each candidate. The Group noted candidates

raised concerns around the use of RCDF. The Group’s Final Report will comment

further on this.

Women Candidates

26 women candidates contested the election. We encourage the SIEC and the

Political Parties Commission to continue providing an environment that would

encourage more women, including from diverse backgrounds, to participate and

contest at the next general election. Greater consideration should be given to

engage with women’s civil society organisations and networks to identify the

best way to achieve gender equality in political representation.

Domestic Observers

We welcome the participation of domestic observers in this election. We

continue to encourage the SIEC and stakeholders to support domestic election

observation, which is critical for the transparency of election processes and

further consolidation of democracy.

Declaration of Results

Some results have been declared. The full declaration of results will be issued

in due course and we hope political parties, candidates and citizens continue

to display the patience they have so far exercised, to ensure the whole electoral

process remains peaceful.

The Group will finalise its report with detailed findings and assessment on this

national general election. This report will be submitted to the Commonwealth

Secretary-General, who will in turn convey it to the Government of Solomon

Islands, the SIEC, and other national stakeholders. It will also be made available

to Commonwealth Governments, and to the public.

Conclusion

It has been a privilege for our Group to observe this important democratic

process in the Solomon Islands. The country’s journey in consolidating its

democracy and development continues and the Commonwealth will work

closely with the incoming Government and other development partners. We

hope that our report and recommendations, if implemented, will continue to

strengthen the Solomon Islands’ electoral system and democratic institutions.

We extend our heartfelt thanks to everyone whom we have met and received

assistance from in undertaking our duties, and especially the people of Solomon

Islands for their warm welcome and hospitality.

Tank yu tumas.

Honiara

6 April 2019

For more information, or to organise media interviews, please contact Sonali

Campion

Email: [email protected] Tel: +677 7249473

Note to Editors

The Commonwealth is a voluntary association of 53 independent and equal

sovereign states. It is home to 2.4 billion citizens, of whom 60 per cent are

under the age of 30. The Commonwealth includes some of the world’s largest,

smallest, richest and poorest countries, spanning five regions. 31 of its

members are small states, many of them island nations. Commonwealth

countries are supported by an active network of more than 80

intergovernmental, civil society, cultural and professional organisations.

Visit www.thecommonwealth.org

Annex C – Biographies of Chair and Group Members

Hon Sato Kilman Livtuvanu (Vanuatu) - Chair

Hon Sato Kilman Livtuvanu (born 30 December 1957) is a Vanuatu politician. He

had been Prime Minister of Vanuatu from June 2015 to February 2016. Kilman

was previously Prime Minister from December 2010 to April 2011 and from May

to June 2011, though his premiership was subsequently annulled by a court of

law. He was elected Prime Minister again on 26 June 2011, thus beginning his

first legally recognised term in the premiership; he served until 23 March 2013.

He is also the current Leader of the People's Progress Party. He is an MP

from Lakatoro on Malekula Island.

Senator Lisa Singh (Australia)

Lisa Singh has been an Australian Senator since 2010, representing the state of

Tasmania. She is regarded as the first woman of South Asian descent to be

elected to the Australian Parliament and follows in the political footsteps of

her grandfather Ram Jati Singh, a member of the Fijian Parliament in the 1960s.

During her term in the Senate, Lisa has served in various roles as a Shadow

Assistant Minister and in 2016 was seconded to the United Nations General

Assembly in New York as a delegate from the Australian parliament. She is a

member of the Australian parliament’s foreign affairs committee, privileges

and law enforcement committees. In 2014, the Indian President awarded her

a Pravasi Bharatiya Samaan for fostering friendly relations between India and

Australia.

Prior to being elected to the Australian Senate, Lisa served in the Tasmanian

Parliament from 2006 and as a Minister in the Labor government. She is a strong

advocate for Australia’s investment in international development, refugees,

women’s rights and the important role of the Indo-Pacific diaspora in Australia's

future prosperity.

Sharon Bhagwan-Rolls (Fiji)

Sharon Bhagwan-Rolls is the Board Chair, ISG Gender Liaison, and GPPAC Pacific

Regional Representative of the Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed

Conflict (GPPAC), as well as the Co- Chair of the Board of Directors for the

Global Fund for Women. Sharon is a Gender, Media and Communications

Specialist. As the co-founder of FemLINKpacific (2000-2018), she led the

establishment of a women-led community media network and the Pacific's first

women-led community radio network and Women's Weather Watch inter-

operable information-communication system.

She has also served as: civil society adviser to the United Nations on Women,

Peace and Security; International Ambassador and Pacific Coordinator of the

Global Media Monitoring Project (GMMP); World Pulse Ambassador (2019); and

Steering Group member of the Feminist Alliance for Rights (FAR).

Beverly Joeman (Malaysia)

Beverly Joeman currently serves as the Bersih 2.0 Vice Chair (Sabah). She is

involved in election monitoring and electoral reform through the Malaysian

national platform, participated in the Expert Meeting on Election Offences

During Election Campaign Period (Malaysia), observed Malaysia’s 14

General

Election (2018), and several by-elections, continues to organise smart

voters/seminar/forum, and advocates for news voters registration and civil

society rights.

Beverly was previously the Secretariat Director of Jaringan Orang Asal

SeMalaysia (JOAS), involved in the advocating for Orang Asal Rights at the

Business & Human Rights Forum, and at the 17th Expert Mechanism on the

Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP) at the United Nations in Geneva. She was

also part of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) team for JOAS, pushing for the

ratification of the ILO Convention 169, and Malaysia’s recognition of UN

Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).

Dr Rajen Prasad (New Zealand)

Rajen Prasad is a former Commonwealth Special Envoy to Lesotho. He has been

a New Zealand Member of Parliament and served previously as New Zealand’s

Race Relations Conciliator and Human Rights Commissioner, and Chief

Commissioner of the Families Commission. He also has experience in judicial

work as a Member of the Residence Review Tribunal hearing appeals against

immigration decisions. He served for six years on the Board of Bank of Baroda

(New Zealand) and was its Chairman for three years.

He is a former Associate Professor from Massey University and has extensive

experience in strategy development, governance review and development,

corporate governance and in social policy formation and implementation. He

has written widely in his field and is currently a consultant.

Ahmed Issack Hassan (Kenya)

Ahmed Issack Hassan is an Advocate at the High Court of Kenya and an

independent consultant on Elections. He is a Former Chairperson of the

Independent Elections & Boundaries Commission of Kenya (2009-2017) and a

Former Chairperson of the Commonwealth Electoral Network Steering

Committee (2014- 2016).

Reuben Kaiulo (Papua New Guinea)

Reuben Kaiulo has been serving as a Senior Electoral Adviser to the Papua New

Guinea Electoral Commissioner since 2015. He is the Former Electoral

Commissioner for Papua New Guinea (1991-2003), where he managed three

National Parliament General Elections in 1992, 1997 and 2002.

He has been a member of several Commonwealth Observer Groups, including in

Zimbabwe (1980), Bangladesh (1996) and Fiji (2001). He was a Member of the

IFES Observer Team that observed the 1999 Indonesia General election after

decades of authoritarianism, and was in Vanuatu in 2016 as a Member of the

MSG Observer Team. He has been awarded the Order of the British Empire (MBE)

by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second.

Hendrick Gappy (Seychelles)

Hendrick Gappy was the Electoral Commissioner of Seychelles from 1998 until

2018, with the additional responsibility of Boundaries Delimitation and also

being the Registrar of Political Parties. In 2011, a new Electoral Commission

was established with Hendrick as Chairperson plus four members. The Electoral

Commission in partnership with all stakeholders undertook a massive Electoral

Reform project on all legal instruments pertaining to elections. Prior to this,

he served as the Director-General of the Management and Information Systems

Division responsible for the National Statistics Office and the National IT Office.

He has been the Census Commissioner on several occasions.

Internationally, Hendrick has been involved with various organisations including

the Commonwealth, SADC, COI, the United Nations and others in the context

of electoral observation, statistical reform, and evaluation of IT for voters

registration systems. He has been a member of several Commonwealth

Observer Groups, including in South Africa (1994) where Mandela was elected

to power, Maldives (2013), Solomon Islands (2001 and 2014) and Antigua and

Barbuda (2018).

Kimberly Gilbert (Trinidad and Tobago)

Kimberly Gilbert currently serves as the Board Member for Training and

Development of the Caribbean Regional Youth Council (CRYC). She is tasked

with designing and expanding development programmes based on the needs of

the organization and of individuals. Moreover, she assists with the management

and delivery of training and development programmes of CRYC and its

members. Since taking office in January 2018, Gilbert has conducted several

workshops, trainings and discussions with youth leaders across the Caribbean;

equipping them with tools necessary for their development and that of the

young people of their respective countries. Most notable is her management

and execution of the Caribbean Youth Leaders' Workshop: Policy and Advocacy

for the Sustainable Caribbean. This event hosted youth from fourteen different

Caribbean countries and trained them in best practices for policy development

and advocacy.

Kimberly recently served as the Returning Officer for the Guyana National

Youth Council Election (GNYC). She introduced the use of an online electronic

voting system to the process after concluding that the geography and economic

status made it severely difficult for the GNYC members to congregate for one

day of voting. Gilbert is currently building an online resource database for youth

and youth workers in the Caribbean while planning the 6

Caribbean Youth

Leaders’ Summit.

Pesi Fonua (Tonga)

Pesi Fonua is the Publisher of the Vava'u Press Ltd, a Tongan publishing company

established in 1979. He was Editor-Publisher of the Matangi Tonga, Tonga's

national news magazine from 1989 to 2003. Following transition to an online

platform, he has since 2004 been the Editor of Matangi Tonga Online.

Vava’u Press publishes notable books in the Tongan and English languages. In

June 2019, The Poems and Songs of Queen Salote, a 420 page hard cover book,

is scheduled to be published.

Wilson Toa (Vanuatu)

Wilson Toa is the CEO for Transparency International Vanuatu where he

manages and supports projects and initiatives in the areas of transparency and

accountability. A fter spending over a decade working in media and diplomatic

missions, Wilson joined civil society in 2015 with the interest of encouraging

partnerships between civil society and the government to promote policies that

support better accountability and transparency in all sectors in Vanuatu. Wilson

has worked for the National Media in Vanuatu, the New Zealand High

Commission, Australian High Commission, and ABC International (PACMAS) and

has been on different Boards and committees within the government and civil

society. In addition to the various roles he has held, Wilson is also a trained

Leadership Trainer.

Commonwealth Secretariat Staff Team

Mr Albert Mariner, Head, Asia/Europe/Caribbean/Pacific Section, Governance

and Peace Directorate (Staff Team Leader)

Mr Jonathan Cheng, Political Officer, Asia/Europe/Caribbean/Pacific Section,

Governance and Peace Directorate

Ms Sonali Campion, Programme Officer, Commonwealth Electoral Network,

Governance and Peace Directorate

Mr Abubakar Abdullahi, Programme Officer, Good Offices Section, Governance

and Peace Directorate

Annex D – Deployment Plan

Honiara and West Guadalcanal

Sato Kilman Livtuvanu

Albert Mariner

Sonali Campion

Honiara and North and East

Guadalcanal

Senator Lisa Singh

Hendrick Gappy

Western Province – Marovo

Ahmed Issack Hassan

Jonathan Cheng

Western Province -

Gizo/Kolombangara

Dr Rajen Prasad

Kimberly Gilbert

Isabel – Kia

Beverly Joeman

Wilson Toa

Central Province – Tulagi

Sharon Bhagwan-Rolls

Abubakar Abdullahi

Malaita – Auki

Reuben Kaiulo

Pesi Fonua

Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation

The Commonwealth Secretariat is a signatory to both the Declaration of

Principles for International Election Observation and the associated Code of

Conduct for International Election Observation Missions, which were

commemorated on 27 October 2005 at the United Nations in New York.

Commonwealth Observer Groups are organised and conducted in accordance with the

Declaration and Commonwealth Observers undertake their duties in accordance with

the Code of Conduct.