BUDGET
2015–16
MARCH 21, 2015 vol l no 12
EPW
Economic & Political Weekly
26
an excise charge that is incurred. For
households who have gold handed down
for generations or who have purchased it
from small jewellers there will be no
paper trail available as to the customs
payments on the import of the gold.
Hence, gold deposited under a monetisa-
tion scheme should be exempt from the
payment of excise (currently 1%).
Incentives to Monetise Gold
A tension that individuals face in bring-
ing in their gold to a gold monetisation
scheme is the fear of investigation by tax
authorities after subscription to the
scheme. In many families in the country
gold has been part of the family inherit-
ance for generations. Also, in many
instances gold is purchased from unor-
ganised goldsmiths who do not provide
ownership documents or a purchase trail.
Under the current situation banks are
not required to report any deposits in
cash by their customers that are less
than Rs 1 million. The same limit could
be applied for any deposit of gold made
into a gold monetisation scheme. Also
the current minimum cap on gold depos-
its at 500 gm excludes many middle-
income households. The minimum cap
on gold deposits can be reduced to 50
gm. For any deposit of gold below say
500 gm or Rs 1 million worth of gold,
only identity and address proof should
be required. After that know your cus-
tomer (KYC) requirements could be
enhanced to include permanent account
number (PAN). It is important to stress
that KYC requirements should be imple-
mented
14
so as to improve confi dence in
the system and to introduce transparency.
Such requirements have the advantage
that they make it diffi cult to trade in
smuggled gold. The fact that any cus-
tomer must already have a savings
account with the bank and the metal
account is an add-on facility will simplify
KYC documentation.
The taxation system is currently con-
ducive for gold monetisation schemes and
requires no change. Interest earned on
gold deposits are exempt from income
tax as a result of the amendment to
Section 10(15)(vi) of the Income Tax Act
as amended by the Finance Act, 1999.
Finally, a gold deposit is also exempt
from capital gains that arise from trading
or redemption as per Section 2(14)(vi)
of the Income Tax Act as amended
by the Finance Act, 1999. Nomination
facilities for such deposits in individual
or joint names as per depository rules
should be available. Deposits of gold
should also be transferable as per
depository rules.
The returns being offered on gold
deposit schemes have hitherto not been
attractive. SBI from September 2010 has
been offering 0.75% per annum for three
years, and 1% for four to fi ve years with
the interest calculated in gold currency
(XAU)
15
and payable in equivalent rupees.
It is possible to pay 2% to 3% annual
grammage return that will make the
scheme attractive (Table 1). The minimum
deposit unlike earlier can also be for a
year with multiples of one year exten-
sions in order to provide fl exibility to the
depositor.
16
The period of deposits that
the SBI offers of three to fi ve years should
be changed to one to seven years. Pre-
mature payment with a penalty after a
lock-in period of one year as currently
operates could be continued. The bank
may also offer a loan facility to the gold
metal depositor higher than the current
60% loan-to-value ratio, since the collat-
eral is gold of verifi ed purity.
The cost of funds for the scheme may
be estimated as shown in Table 1. This
estimate of cost of funds of 4.9% to
6.95% compares favourably with the 8%
to 10% cost of dollar borrowing from ex-
ternal sources.
18
Our conversations with
jewellers and business groups in the
gold industry indicates that in the fi rst
month of the scheme being put in place,
it would be possible to collect 15 tonnes
of gold with 10 assaying centres set up.
By the end of the fi rst year it would be
possible with extensive marketing of the
scheme to scale this up to 40 tonnes of
gold per month. Additional assaying
centres that may be set up will of course
increase the infl ow of gold that individu-
als wish to monetise. On a conservative
estimate, it would then be possible, by
the end of the fi rst year itself, to have
collected 100 to 150 tonnes of gold from
the scheme. This amounts to 12.1% to
18.2% of the gold imported into the
country in the last year.
19
To put it in a
different perspective — it amounts to
0.5% to 0.75% of the estimated mini-
mum of 20,000 tonnes of gold lying
unproductive in the country.
20
The Sovereign Gold Bonds mentioned
in the budget are a costly way of trying
to reduce investor demand for holding
physical gold. To pay at maturity, the fol-
lowing three components will have to be
hedged: the gold price exposure will
have to be hedged with bullion banks, as
will the exchange rate and customs duty
have to be hedged as the return on such
bonds is redeemable in gold. The other
budget announcement of introducing an
India Gold Coin with the Ashoka Chakra
on it is long overdue. Such coins
should provide assurance to a buy-
er that the purity, weight, and
quality of a gold coin is up to inter-
national standards and that means
production by a refi nery which has
the capability to deliver a brand
that is acceptable internationally.
Internationally, gold coins that have
established a brand such as the
South African Kruger gold coin,
the Canadian Maple Leaf, or the
Australian kangaroo gold coin,
have a purity of 24 carat and they
are aesthetically pleasing. The high
growth in the sale of coins through
bank channels (estimated at upwards of
35%) indicates a pent-up demand. The
current market has largely unbranded
coins with uncertain purity, which pre-
vents the recycling of gold in the country.
Besides, coins are a sure way to increase
the number of organised players in the
value chain in India.
Table 1: Cost of Funds for Gold Monetisation Policy
Cost of Assaying:
(a) Purity verification cost: 0.1%–0.2%
(b) Refining cost: 0.5% –0.75%
(c) Logistics cost: 0.5%–0.75%
(d) Refiner administrative
costs (software, insurance,
administration): 0.5%–0.75%
Sub-Total 1.6%–2.45%
Cost of banks:
(a) Gold price NIL since no need
hedging cost: to hedge
(b) Operational expenses: 0.3%–0.5%
(c) Interest paid to depositor: 2.0%–3.0%
(d) Risk premiums:
17
1.0%–1.5%
Sub-Total 3.3% –4.5%
Total Cost 4.9%–6.95%