1
Memorandum of Understanding between the Information
Commissioner and the Surveillance Camera Commissioner
Introduction
1. The Information Commissioner and the Surveillance Camera
Commissioner have distinct responsibilities and interests for
ensuring the effective regulation of surveillance cameras in the
context of their own statutory roles. They are both committed to
ensuring that there is close cooperation in the conduct of their
respective statutory duties to ensure that there is effective
regulation. In particular the Commissioners are committed to
ensuring that regulatory activity is undertaken in a way which
enables individuals, organisations and other stakeholders to be clear
about how the responsibilities of the Commissioners are discharged
individually, and collectively and also better understand their own
responsibilities and rights in that regard.
2. This Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) establishes a framework
for cooperation and information sharing between the Information
Commissioner and the Surveillance Camera Commissioner,
collectively referred to as "the parties" throughout this document.
In particular, it sets out the broad principles of collaboration and the
legal framework governing the sharing of relevant information and
intelligence between the parties. The shared aims of this MoU are to
enable closer working between the parties, including the exchange
of appropriate information, so as to assist them in discharging their
regulatory functions.
3. This MoU is a statement of intent that does not give rise to legally
binding obligations on the part of either the Information
Commissioner or the Surveillance Camera Commissioner. The
parties have determined that they do not exchange sufficient
quantities of personal data to warrant entering into a separate data
sharing agreement, but this will be kept under review.
The role and function of the Information Commissioner
4. The Information Commissioner is a corporation sole appointed by
Her Majesty the Queen under the Data Protection Act 2018 to act as
the UK’s independent regulator to uphold information rights in the
2
public interest, promote openness by public bodies and data privacy
for individuals.
5. The Information Commissioner is empowered to take a range of
regulatory action for breaches of the following legislation:
Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA);
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR);
Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive)
Regulations 2003 (PECR);
Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA);
Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR);
Environmental Protection Public Sector Information
Regulations 2009 (INSPIRE Regulations);
Investigatory Powers Act 2016;
Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations 2015;
Enterprise Act 2002;
Security of Network and Information Systems Directive (NIS
Directive); and
Electronic Identification, Authentication and Trust Services
Regulation (eIDAS).
6. Article 57 of the GDPR and Section 115(2)(a) of the DPA 2018 place
a broad range of statutory duties on the Information Commissioner,
including monitoring and enforcement of the GDPR, promotion of
good practice and adherence to the data protection obligations by
those who process personal data. These duties sit alongside those
relating to the other enforcement regimes outlined in paragraph 5
above.
7. The Information Commissioner’s regulatory and enforcement
powers include:
conducting assessments of compliance with the DPA, GDPR,
PECR, eIDAS, the NIS Directive, FOIA and EIR;
3
issuing information notices requiring individuals, controllers or
processors to provide information in relation to an
investigation;
issuing enforcement notices, warnings, reprimands, practice
recommendations and other orders requiring specific actions
by an individual or organisation to resolve breaches (including
potential breaches) of data protection legislation and other
information rights obligations;
administering fines by way of penalty notices in the
circumstances set out in section 155 of the DPA;
administering fixed penalties for failing to meet specific
obligations (such as failing to pay the relevant fee to the
Information Commissioner);
issuing decision notices detailing the outcome of an
investigation under FOIA or EIR;
certifying contempt of court should an authority fail to comply
with an information notice, decision notice or enforcement
notice under FOIA or EIR; and
prosecuting criminal offences before the Courts.
8. Regulation 31 of PECR, as amended by the Privacy and Electronic
Communications (EC Directive) (Amendment) Regulations 2011,
also provides the Information Commissioner with the power to serve
enforcement notices and issue monetary penalty notices as above
to organisations who breach PECR. This includes, but is not limited
to, breaches in the form of unsolicited marketing which falls within
the ambit of PECR, including automated telephone calls made
without consent, live telephone calls which have not been screened
against the Telephone Preference Service, and unsolicited electronic
messages (Regulations 19, 21 and 22 of PECR respectively).
Functions and powers of the Surveillance Camera Commissioner
9. The Surveillance Camera Commissioner is appointed by the
Secretary of State for the Home Department under Section 34(1) of
the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA).
10. PoFA applies to the use of overt surveillance camera systems (as
defined by the Act) by relevant authorities in England and Wales.
4
Relevant authorities include Chief Officers of police, Police and
Crime Commissioners and Local Authorities. Under the provisions of
PoFA those organisations must have regard to the Secretary of
State’s Surveillance Camera Code of Practice (the Code)failure to
do so can be taken into account by any court of tribunal (s33.4,
PoFA). The Code also requires the Surveillance Camera
Commissioner to encourage voluntary adoption amongst all
organisations and operators using surveillance camera systems.
11. The functions of the Surveillance Camera Commissioner include:
Encouraging compliance with the Code;
Reviewing the operation of the Code; and
Providing advice about the Code (including changes to it or
breaches of it) and publish an annual report.
12. The Surveillance Camera Commissioner will provide information and
advice on appropriate and approved ethical, operational and
technical standards for various aspects of surveillance camera
systems and on approved occupational and competency standards
for persons using these systems or processing images and
information obtained by these systems is expected to provide advice
about the relevant operational, technical, quality management and
occupational competency standards which are available for a system
operator. In reviewing the operation of the Code the Surveillance
Camera Commissioner considers the impact of this system of
regulation against published success criteria and the opportunities
to improve compliance in line with better regulation principles.
13. The Surveillance Camera Commissioner has produced a National
Surveillance Camera Strategy (England and Wales). Implementation
and oversight of this Strategy enables the Surveillance Camera
Commissioner to more effectively discharge his statutory function in
advising the Secretary of State as to the operation of the Code.
Purpose of information sharing
14. The purpose of the MoU is to enable both the Information
Commissioner and the Surveillance Camera Commissioner to share
relevant information which enhances their ability to exercise their
respective functions.
5
15. This MoU should not be interpreted as imposing a requirement on
either party to disclose information in circumstances where doing so
would breach their statutory responsibilities. In particular, each
party must ensure that any disclosure of personal data pursuant to
these arrangements fully complies with both the GDPR and the DPA
2018. The MoU sets out the potential legal framework for
information sharing, but it is for each party to determine for
themselves that any proposed disclosure is compliant with the law.
Principles of cooperation and sharing
16. Subject to any legal restrictions on the disclosure of information
(whether imposed by statute or otherwise) and at their discretion,
the Surveillance Camera Commissioner will alert the Information
Commissioner to any potential breaches of the legislation regulated
by her, within the context of this relationship, and within the scope
of their statutory authority, discovered whilst undertaking
regulatory duties, and provide relevant and necessary supporting
information. Each party recognises that they should be mindful of
the other’s regulatory role, and will ensure that their own activities
don’t compromise the work of the other. This could, for example,
apply to engagement with the media or other third parties.
17. Similarly, and again subject to any legal restrictions on the
disclosure of information, the Information Commissioner will alert
the Surveillance Camera Commissioner to any potential breaches of
the Surveillance Camera Code of Practice within the context of this
relationship and provide relevant and necessary supporting
information.
18. Subject to any legal restrictions on the disclosure of information
(whether imposed by statute or otherwise) and at their discretion,
both parties will:
Communicate regularly to discuss matters of mutual interest
(this may involve participating in multi-agency groups to
address common issues and threats);
Consult one another on any issues which might have
significant implications for the other organisation such as
media announcements/coverage; and
6
Engage regularly to consider opportunities for collaboration;
this will be particularly relevant to projects that can
streamline messaging and minimise regulatory confusion.
19. Both parties will comply with the general laws they are subject to,
including, but not limited to, local data protection laws; the
maintenance of any prescribed documentation and policies; and
comply with any governance requirements in particular relating to
security and retention, and process personal data in accordance
with the statutory rights of individuals.
Lawful basis for sharing information
Information shared by the Surveillance Camera Commissioner with the
Information Commissioner
20. The Information Commissioner's statutory function relates to the
legislation set out at paragraph 5, and this MoU governs information
shared by the Surveillance Camera Commissioner to assist the
Information Commissioner to meet those responsibilities. To the
extent that any such shared information comprises personal data,
as defined under the GDPR and DPA 2018, the Surveillance Camera
Commissioner is a Controller so must ensure that it has a lawful
basis to share it and that doing so would otherwise be compliant
with the data protection principles. It must also ensure that sharing
the information in question is consistent with its legal powers.
21. Section 131 of the Data Protection Act 2018 may provide both the
lawful basis, from a data protection perspective, and the legal
power for the Surveillance Camera Commissioner to share
information with the Information Commissioner. Under this
particular provision, the Surveillance Camera Commissioner is not
prohibited or restricted from disclosing information to the
Information Commissioner by any other enactment or rule of law
provided it is "information necessary for the discharge of the
Commissioner's functions".
Information shared by the Information Commissioner with the
Surveillance Camera Commissioner
22. The Information Commissioner, during the course of her activities,
will receive information from a range of sources, including personal
data. She will process all personal data in accordance with the
7
principles of the GDPR, the DPA 2018 and all other applicable
legislation. The Information Commissioner may identify that
information she holds, which may include personal data, should be
shared with the Surveillance Camera Commissioner, as it would
assist him in performing his functions and responsibilities.
23. Section 132(1) of the DPA 2018 states that the Information
Commissioner can only share confidential information with others if
there is lawful authority to do so. In this context, the information
will be considered confidential if has been obtained, or provided to,
the Information Commissioner in the course of, or the purposes of,
discharging her functions, relates to an identifiable individual or
business, and is not otherwise available to the public from other
sources. This therefore includes, but is not limited to, personal
data. Section 132(2) of the DPA 2018 sets out the circumstances in
which the Information Commissioner will have the lawful authority
to share that personal data with the Surveillance Camera
Commissioner. In particular, it will be lawful in circumstances
where:
The sharing was necessary for the purpose of the Information
Commissioner discharging her functions (section 132(2)(c));
The sharing was made for the purposes of criminal or civil
proceedings, however arising (section 132(2)(e)); or
The sharing was necessary in the public interest, taking into
account the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of any
person (section 132(2)(f)).
24. The Information Commissioner will therefore be permitted to share
information with the Surveillance Camera Commissioner in
circumstances where it has been determined that it is reasonably
necessary to do so in furtherance of one of those grounds outlined
at paragraph 23. In doing so, the Information Commissioner will
identify the function of the Surveillance Camera Commissioner with
which that information may assist, and assess whether that function
could reasonably be achieved without access to the particular
information in question. In particular, where the information
proposed for sharing with the Surveillance Camera Commissioner
amounts to personal data the Information Commissioner will
8
consider whether it is necessary to provide it in an identifiable form
in order for the Surveillance Camera Commissioner to perform its
functions, or whether disclosing it in an anonymised form would
suffice.
25. If information to be disclosed by the Information Commissioner was
received by her in the course of discharging her functions as a
designated enforcer under the Enterprise Act 2002, any disclosure
shall be made in accordance with the restrictions set out in Part 9 of
that Act.
26. Where information is to be disclosed by either party for law
enforcement purposes under section 35 (4) or (5) of the DPA 2018
then they will only do so in accordance with an appropriate policy
document as outlined by section 42 of the DPA.
27. Where a request for information is received by either party under
data protection laws, FOIA or EIR, and where the information being
sought under that request includes information obtained from, or
shared by, the other party, the recipient of the request will seek the
views of the other party. In particular, the receiving party will have
regard to the FOIA section 45 Code of Practice and/or the EIR
regulation 16 Code of Practice as appropriate. However the decision
to disclose or withhold the information (and therefore any liability
arising out of that decision) remains with the party in receipt of the
request, either as Controller in respect of that data or the public
authority that holds the information under FOIA or EIR.
Method of exchange
28. Appropriate security measures shall be agreed to protect
information transfers in accordance with the sensitivity of the
information and any classification that is applied by the sender.
Confidentiality and data breach reporting
29. Where confidential material is shared between parties it will be
marked with the appropriate security classification.
30. Where one party has received information from the other, it will
consult with the other party before passing the information to a
9
third party or using the information in an enforcement proceeding
or court case.
31. Where confidential material obtained from, or shared by, the
originating party is wrongfully disclosed by the party holding the
information, this party will bring this to the attention of the
originating party without delay. This is in addition to obligations to
report a personal data breach under the GDPR and/or DPA where
personal data is contained in the information disclosed.
Duration and review of the MoU
32. The Information Commissioner and the Surveillance Camera
Commissioner will monitor the operation of this MoU and will review
it biennially.
33. Any minor changes to this memorandum identified between reviews
may be agreed in writing between the parties.
34. Any issues arising in relation to this memorandum will be notified to
the point of contact for each organisation.
Designated Point of Contact
35. Each Commissioner will identify a Designated Point of Contact (DPC)
within their respective organisation who will be the primary point of
contact with responsibility for communication between the two
Commissioner bodies.
36. Subject to any legal restrictions on the disclosure of information
(whether imposed by statute or otherwise) the key responsibilities
of each DPC are as follows:
To ensure the effective and timely communication and receipt of
information between the parties within the terms of this MoU;
To ensure that an appropriate assessment is made as to the
relevancy and priority of any matter communicated so as to
determine whether further action, dissemination of information
or advice is appropriate and take responsibility for ensuring all
areas of receipt and assessment of information of mutual
10
concern is effectively processed and that any such information is
accompanied by clear decision making and effective
dissemination;
To horizon scan and identify potential areas of relevant interest
and focus of each party which may overlap, duplicate effort,
conflict or may otherwise benefit from a coordinated approach;
To ensure that each Commissioner is notified promptly of any
matter which is considered to merit their attention and this
includes escalating matters to the Commissioners which are
considered by either party to merit further action, or inaction, by
one or both parties where agreement cannot be reached by the
DPC’s; and
Maintain appropriate records of information which may assist the
Commissioners in determining the effectiveness of the
arrangements set out in this MoU. In particular the DPCs are
responsible for identifying trends and areas where more strategic
thinking or action may be of value on behalf of both parties.
Key contacts
37. The parties have both identified a key person who is responsible for
managing this MoU:
38.
Information
Commissioner’s Office
The Surveillance Camera
Commissioner’s office
Address: Wycliffe House,
Water Lane, Wilmslow, SK9
5AF
Address: 2 Marsham Street, 4
th
Floor Peel, London, SW1P 4DF
39. Those individuals will maintain an open dialogue between each
other in order to ensure that the MoU remains effective and fit for
purpose. They will also seek to identify any difficulties in the
working relationship, and proactively seek to minimise the same.
11
Signatories