faculty members by disrupting the classroom, interfering with their interactions with other students, or in any way
impeding or disrupting faculty member’s research projects.
2. Misconduct in Research and Creative Efforts: Submission of work that the student knows to be inaccurate, including
the fabrication, falsification, improper revision, selective reporting, or inappropriate concealing of data. Misconduct
also includes a violation of human subjects standards including the failure to obtain IRB or equivalent approval before
conducting research with human subjects; and/or the release of information or data given in the expectation of
confidentiality to the researcher, creative artists, etc.; and/or failure to adhere to any applicable federal, state, municipal,
disciplinary or collegiate regulations, standards or rules for the protection of human or animal subjects, or the protocols
of the study population.
3. Cheating on Quizzes, Tests, or Examinations: Using or attempting to use any materials, including but not limited to
notes, study aids, books or electronic devices, not authorized by the instructor; copying off another student’s work;
allowing another student to copy off your own work; taking an exam (which includes tests and quizzes) for another
student or allowing another person to take an exam in your place; providing or receiving any kind of unauthorized
assistance in an examination, such as providing or receiving substantive information about test questions or materials,
topics, or subjects covered by the test.
4. Use of Prohibited Materials: using prohibited materials or equipment for performances, rehearsals, or classics
assignments. For example, using a hidden “cheat sheet” with text for a vocal repertoire, vocal jury, or junior/senior
recital.
5. False Submission: submission as one’s own work that has been produced by another. For example, using another
person’s speech or presentation materials (e.g., a PowerPoint presentation created by another student or obtained from
the Internet) or submission of work written or produced by another person (e.g., a paper acquired online, from other
published sources, student organization files, or unattributed results generated by computer algorithm).
6. Aiding and Abetting False Submissions: Providing papers or other academic work to fellow students. For example,
providing a paper from student organization files, writing or researching a paper for another student, or completing an
assignment for another student. In general, unauthorized collaboration on the production of any academic work without
prior approval of the instructor is prohibited. When in doubt, students should consult with the course instructor.
7. Multiple Submissions: Submission of the same work, in whole or substantial part, to more than one course without the
explicit prior approval of all instructors currently involved. If work has been submitted in a prior course, either at
Adrian or another institution, the student(s) must receive approval from the instructor(s) of the current course. If work
is to be submitted to multiple courses in the same term, the student(s) must receive approval from the instructor of each
course.
a. The policy applies to resubmission of assignments for a course that is retaken for any reason.
b. The multiple submissions rule is not intended to prevent students from building on or further developing
work begun in prior courses. Examples include the further development of an art object begun in a course
such as Two Dimensional Design in a later studio art class, the expansion of a project begun in a research
methods course for a capstone project, the ongoing development of a laboratory experiment, etc. In each of
these cases, however, the instructor of the later course has the authority to determine to what degree the
original work may be incorporated into the later work.
8. Corrupted Files: Submitting an unreadable file known to be corrupted or intentionally corrupted. Claiming false
grounds for requesting an extended deadline. For example, using an online site or application to corrupt the file in order
to create delay and avoid deadlines (note that intentional data corruption is typically detectable).
9. Fabrication: The use of invented, counterfeited or forged information, sources, or data in any assignment, test, paper,
project, lab report, etc. Includes alteration or misleading omission of relevant data and dishonest reporting of research
results, but does not apply to legitimate disagreement over the interpretation of findings, data, concepts, theories, etc.
10. Plagiarism:
a. Plagiarize – Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary defines plagiarism as: “to steal and pass off the ideas or
words of another as one’s own; to use a creative production without crediting the source; to commit literary
theft; to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source.
b. The act of submitting a paper, project, test, or other assignment signifies that the student affirms that the work
is his/her own. The absence of any discernible attempt to give credit to your source will be taken as prima
facie evidence of intent to plagiarize. In other words, if you have made no attempt to give credit to someone
else, you have created a presumption of intentional plagiarism. Inadvertent plagiarism is sloppy scholarship
and is not acceptable, even if committed out of ignorance.
c. Types of Plagiarism
i. Direct plagiarism is taking the exact words of an author without giving due credit. There should be
a visual indication of using an author’s exact words, such as quotation marks or block indentation,
and there should be a proper citation of the author’s work.
Original Source: “To the extent that behavior problems occur in the classroom, teachers should question the students and conduct
systematic observations of them” (Good & Brophy, 1991, p. 257).
1. Acceptable Use: Population cannot grow forever because the world is finite and cannot
support an infinite number of people (Hardin 1968). [Note that although the student has